Time-shift estimation and focusing through distributed aberration using multirow arrays

The effects of element height on time-shift estimation and transmit focus compensation are demonstrated experimentally. Multirow ultrasonic transducer arrays were emulated by combining adjacent elements of a 3.0-MHz, 0.6-mm pitch, two-dimensional array to define larger virtual elements. Pulse-echo data were acquired through tissue-mimicking distributed aberrators, and time-shift maps estimated from those data were used for transmit focus compensation. Compensated beams formed by arrays with fine row pitches were similar, but focus restoration was significantly less effective for "1.75-D" arrays with a coarse row pitch. For example, when focus compensation was derived from strongly aberrated random scattering data [70-ns nominal rms arrival time fluctuation with 7 mm FWHM (full-width at half-maximum) correlation length], the mean -20 dB lateral beamwidths were 5.2 mm for f/2.0 arrays with 0.6- and 1.8-mm row pitches and 9.5 mm for an f /2.0 array with 5.4-mm pitch. Time-shift maps estimated from random scattering data acquired with 5.4-mm pitch arrays included large discontinuities caused by low correlation of signals received on vertically and diagonally adjacent emulated elements. The results indicate that multirow arrays designed for use with aberration correction should have element dimensions much less than 75% of the correlation length of the aberration and perhaps as small as 25 to 30% of the correlation length.

[1]  Gregg E. Trahey,et al.  Adaptive imaging using an 8/spl times/128 array , 2000, 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121).

[2]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Phase-aberration correction using signals from point reflectors and diffuse scatterers: measurements , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  R C Waag,et al.  Time-shift compensation of ultrasonic pulse focus degradation using least-mean-square error estimates of arrival time. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  R C Waag,et al.  Measurements of ultrasonic pulse arrival time and energy level variations produced by propagation through abdominal wall. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  D C Sullivan,et al.  Two dimensional ultrasonic beam distortion in the breast: in vivo measurements and effects. , 1992, Ultrasonic imaging.

[6]  Thomas W. Parks,et al.  New results in the design of digital interpolators" ieee trans , 1975 .

[7]  W.F. Walker,et al.  Aberrator integration error in adaptive imaging , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  T. D. Mast,et al.  The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part I. Measurements. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Improved estimation of phase aberration profiles , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  D.-L.D. Liu,et al.  Estimation and correction of ultrasonic wavefront distortion using pulse-echo data received in a two-dimensional aperture , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  L. S. Smith,et al.  Elevation performance of 1.25D and 1.5D transducer arrays , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  Raoul Mallart,et al.  The van Cittert–Zernike theorem in pulse echo measurements , 1991 .

[13]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Phase-aberration correction using signals from point reflectors and diffuse scatterers: basic principles , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[14]  Raoul Mallart,et al.  Adaptive focusing in scattering media through sound‐speed inhomogeneities: The van Cittert Zernike approach and focusing criterion , 1994 .

[15]  W. Walker,et al.  A fundamental limit on delay estimation using partially correlated speckle signals , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[16]  G E Trahey,et al.  Speckle coherence and implications for adaptive imaging. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  R C Waag,et al.  Measurement and correction of ultrasonic pulse distortion produced by the human breast. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  E. Madsen,et al.  Tissue mimicking materials for ultrasound phantoms. , 1978, Medical physics.

[19]  Dong-Lai Liu,et al.  A comparison of ultrasonic wavefront distortion and compensation in one-dimensional and two-dimensional apertures , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[20]  K. W. Rigby Real-time correction of beamforming time delay errors in abdominal ultrasound imaging , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[22]  K. Takamizawa,et al.  An investigation of wavefront distortion correction: correction using averaged phase information and the effect of correction in one and two dimensions (medical US imaging) , 1991, IEEE 1991 Ultrasonics Symposium,.

[23]  Robert C. Waag,et al.  Distributed aberrators for emulation of ultrasonic pulse distortion by abdominal wall , 2002 .

[24]  L. Mandel,et al.  Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics , 1995 .

[25]  R C Waag,et al.  Measurements of ultrasonic pulse arrival time differences produced by abdominal wall specimens. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  G.E. Trahey,et al.  A comparative evaluation of several algorithms for phase aberration correction , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[27]  E L Madsen,et al.  Oil-in-gelatin dispersions for use as ultrasonically tissue-mimicking materials. , 1982, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.