National Ethics Advisory Bodies in the Emerging Landscape of Responsible Research and Innovation
暂无分享,去创建一个
Franc Mali | Christopher Coenen | Christopher Coenen | Franc Mali | Blanka Groboljsek | Toni Pustovrh | Toni Pustovrh | B. Groboljsek
[1] A. Nordmann. If and Then: A Critique of Speculative NanoEthics , 2007, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.
[2] Maximilian Weber,et al. Gesammelte politische Schriften , 1960 .
[3] M. Castells. The Network Society , 2004 .
[4] A. Grunwald,et al. The normative basis of (health) technology assessment and the role of ethical expertise , 2004, Poiesis Prax..
[5] Christopher Coenen. Deliberating Visions: The Case of Human Enhancement in the Discourse on Nanotechnology and Convergence , 2009 .
[6] R. Tutton. Constructing Participation in Genetic Databases , 2007 .
[7] Peter Weingart. Die Stunde der Wahrheit? : zum Verhältnis der Wissenschaft zu Politik, Wirtschaft und Medien in der Wissensgesellschaft , 2001 .
[8] H. Jonas. Das Prinzip Verantwortung : Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation , 1988 .
[9] Arie Rip,et al. TAKING EUROPEAN KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY SERIOUSLY Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission , 2007 .
[10] M. Lengwiler. Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology , 2008 .
[11] M. Korstanje. The Risk Society: Towards a new modernity , 2009 .
[12] R. Kurzweil,et al. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology , 2006 .
[13] M. Friele. Do committees ru(i)n the bio-political culture? On the democratic legitimacy of bioethics committees. , 2003, Bioethics.
[14] Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al. Converging Technologies - Shaping the Future of European Societies , 2004 .
[15] Martin W. Bauer,et al. Biotechnology - the Making of a Global Controversy , 2002 .
[16] R. V. Schomberg. Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2011 .
[17] M. Peinado,et al. The making of a global controversy , 2004 .
[18] D. Wilson. Creating the ‘ethics industry': Mary Warnock, in vitro fertilization and the history of bioethics in Britain , 2010, BioSocieties.
[19] S. Borrás. The Innovation Policy of the European Union , 2003 .
[20] L. PytlikZillig,et al. Public Engagement for Informing Science and Technology Policy: What Do We Know, What Do We Need to Know, and How Will We Get There? , 2011 .
[21] J. Gregory,et al. Producing the Post-Fordist Public: The Political Economy of Public Engagement with Science , 2010 .
[22] S. Kelly. Public Bioethics and Publics: Consensus, Boundaries, and Participation in Biomedical Science Policy , 2003, Science, technology & human values.
[23] Bernhard Wieser,et al. Yearbook 2001 of the Institute for Advanced Studies on Science, Technology & Society , 2001 .
[24] F. Fukuyama. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution , 2002 .
[25] H. M. Collins,et al. The Third Wave of Science Studies , 2002, Science, Technology, and Society.
[26] Franc Mali. Bringing converging technologies closer to civil society: the role of the precautionary principle , 2009 .
[27] M. Frankel,et al. Good, Better Best: The Human Quest for Enhancement , 2006 .
[28] Patrick Lin,et al. Ethics of Human Enhancement: 25 Questions & Answers , 2010 .
[29] Mihail C. Roco,et al. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science , 2003 .
[30] C. Thorpe. Participation as Post-Fordist Politics: Demos, New Labour, and Science Policy , 2010, Minerva.
[31] Mihail C. Roco,et al. Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020: Retrospective and Outlook , 2011 .
[32] Rudolf Haag. Retrospective and Outlook , 1996 .
[33] Michel Callon,et al. Acting in an uncertain world , 2009 .
[34] Funtowicz Silvio. Post-Normal Science , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
[35] Niels Mejlgaard,et al. Participation and competence as joint components in a cross-national analysis of scientific citizenship , 2010 .
[36] Sheila Jasanoff,et al. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies , 1995 .
[37] M. Gibbons,et al. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .
[38] Karen Kastenhofer,et al. Risk Assessment of Emerging Technologies and Post-Normal Science , 2011 .
[39] L. Levidow. Democratizing technology—or technologizing democracy? Regulating agricultural biotechnology in Europe , 1998 .
[40] Wiebe E. Bijker,et al. The Paradox of Scientific Authority: The Role of Scientific Advice in Democracies , 2009 .
[41] A. Giddens. The consequences of modernity , 1990 .
[42] Mike Michael,et al. Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge , 2003 .
[43] G. Rowe,et al. A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms , 2005 .
[44] A. Schulman. Human dignity and bioethics : essays commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics , 2008 .
[45] Risto Eräsaari. Open-Context Expertise , 2009 .
[46] Kathrin Braun,et al. Beyond Speaking Truth? Institutional Responses to Uncertainty in Scientific Governance , 2010 .
[47] A. Grunwald,et al. Nanotechnology – Steps Towards Understanding Human Beings as Technology? , 2007 .
[48] Ethical Expertise in Democratic Societies , 2008 .
[49] H Roberts,et al. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , 1994 .
[50] C. Kropp,et al. Knowledge on Stage: Scientific Policy Advice , 2010 .
[51] Let's Disagree! Talking Ethics in Technology Controversies , 2011 .
[52] A. Mark,et al. The encyclopedia of Earth , 2010 .
[53] Arianna Ferrari. Developments in the Debate on Nanoethics: Traditional Approaches and the Need for New Kinds of Analysis , 2010 .
[54] H. Ostrer,et al. The Case Against Perfection : Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering , 2008 .
[55] Hans Heinz Holz,et al. JONAS Hans. Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation, 1979 , 2013 .
[56] T. Swierstra,et al. Converging Technologies, Shifting Boundaries , 2009, Nanoethics.
[57] Susana Borrás,et al. The Innovation Policy of the European Union: From Government to Governance , 2003 .
[58] Gregor Wolbring,et al. Why NBIC? Why human performance enhancement? , 2008 .
[59] P. Weingart. Scientific expertise and political accountability: paradoxes of science in politics , 1999 .
[60] Parliamentary technology assessment institutions as indications of reflexive modernization , 2011 .
[61] Hans Peter Peters,et al. Mass-Mediated Expertise as Informal Policy Advice , 2010 .
[62] E. Millstone. Science, risk and governance: Radical rhetorics and the realities of reform in food safety governance , 2009 .
[63] Stefan Böschen,et al. Advisory and Regulatory Science between Uncertainty, Normative Disagreement and Policy-Making , 2010 .
[64] Ulrike Felt,et al. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously , 2009 .
[65] Jacqueline E. W. Broerse,et al. Stakeholder interaction within research consortia on emerging technologies: learning how and what? , 2011 .
[66] Stephen Hilgartner,et al. Science on stage : expert advice as public drama , 2000 .
[67] J. Schmidt,et al. The Renaissance of Francis Bacon , 2011 .
[68] Miltos Ladikas,et al. Embedding society in science & technology policy : European and Chinese perspectives , 2009 .
[69] T. Gieryn,et al. Boundaries of Science , 1995 .
[70] R. V. Schomberg. Understanding Public Debate on Nanotechnologies , 2010 .
[71] Armin Grunwald,et al. Converging technologies: Visions, increased contingencies of the conditio humana, and search for orientation , 2007 .
[72] S. Jasanoff. Designs on Nature , 2005 .