The effects of age at slaughter, genotype and finishing system on the organoleptic properties and texture of bull beef from suckled calves

An experiment was devised to examine the effect of animal age at slaughter, within genotype and finishing system, on bull beef eating quality characteristics to assess the 15 month age limit imposed for bulls at slaughter by the Meat and Livestock Commission specification for improved beef eating quality. The experiment was a factorial design using bulls of two crossbred genotypes (Aberdeen Angus × and Charolais ×), offered two diets (silage-based and barley-based) and slaughtered at two abattoirs. Bulls were slaughtered from approximately 10 months of age on seven dates (ages) at 6-week intervals. Bulls given barley were slaughtered on date numbers 1 to 5 (43 to 67 weeks of age) and bulls given silage on date numbers 2 to 7 (49 to 79 weeks of age). On each slaughter date and at each abattoir the first four commercial steers which followed the bulls on the slaughterline and met the United Kingdom (UK) modal carcass specification R 4L were selected as abattoir, slaughter date and industry representative controls. At 48 h post mortem samples of m. longissimus lumborum; m. biceps femoris; and m. semimembranosus were recovered from all bull and steer carcasses, vacuum packed and stored at 2°C for a fiirther 12 days before freezing and subsequent assessment by a 12 member taste panel and texture analysis using a Warner Bratzler shear jig. Bulls achieved high growth rates during the finishing period averaging 1·22, 1·55, 1·41 and 1·98 kg/day for silage-fed Angus × bulls; barley-fed Angus × bulls; silage-fed Charolais × bulls; and barley-fed Charolais × bulls, respectively (s.e.d. = 0·08; P v. 11·9 kg for m. biceps femoris; P P P It was concluded that beef aged for 14 days post mortem and recovered from young bulls which have achieved high growth rates can be at least as good as that representative of the UK standard product. The 15-month age limit for bulls ensures that commercially produced bulls achieve high lifetime growth rates and will produce beef of a quality comparable with that achieved in this study.

[1]  A. D. Porter,et al.  The effects of age at slaughter, genotype and finishing system on the biochemical properties, muscle fibre type characteristics and eating quality of bull beef from suckled calves. , 1998 .

[2]  A. Cuthbertson,et al.  Eating quality of beef from different sire breeds , 1997 .

[3]  C. Gaskins,et al.  Effects of time on feed and post-mortem aging on palatability and lipid composition of crossbred Wagyu beef. , 1996, Meat science.

[4]  J. B. Morgan,et al.  Modification of early-postmortem muscle pH and use of postmortem aging to improve beef tenderness. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[5]  J. B. Morgan,et al.  Effects of animal age, marbling score, calpastatin activity, subprimal cut, calcium injection, and degree of doneness on the palatability of steaks from limousin steers. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[6]  E. Gullett,et al.  Effect of age and cut on consistency of tenderness and leanness of beef , 1996 .

[7]  S. Shackelford,et al.  Effects of slaughter age on meat tenderness and USDA carcass maturity scores of beef females. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[8]  R. Steen,et al.  Effects of plane of nutrition and slaughter weight on the carcass composition of serially slaughtered bulls, steers and heifers of three breed crosses , 1995 .

[9]  R. Steen The effect of plane of nutrition and slaughter weight on growth and food efficiency in bulls, steers and heifers of three breed crosses. , 1995 .

[10]  A. G. Taylor,et al.  In vitro produced embryos as a means of achieving pregnancy and improving productivity in beef cows , 1995 .

[11]  L. Istasse,et al.  Post-mortem protease activity in relation to in vivo protein turnover in Belgian Blue bulls with different growth rates , 1994 .

[12]  D. Cole Growth regulation in farm animals. Advances in meat research Vol. 7. Edited by A. M. Pearson and T. R. Dutson. Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, London, 1991. ISBN-1-85166-601-X. xx + 636 pp. Price: £95.00. , 1994, Meat science.

[13]  J. B. Morgan,et al.  Meat tenderness and the calpain proteolytic system in longissimus muscle of young bulls and steers. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[14]  T. Wheeler,et al.  Mechanisms associated with the variation in tenderness of meat from Brahman and Hereford cattle. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[15]  T. Wheeler,et al.  Effect of postmortem treatments on the tenderness of meat from Hereford, Brahman and Brahman-cross beef cattle. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[16]  S. Seideman,et al.  CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS, SENSORY PROPERTIES AND MINERAL CONTENT OF MEAT FROM BULLS AND STEERS , 1989 .

[17]  D. Gerrard,et al.  Collagen stability, testosterone secretion and meat tenderness in growing bulls and steers. , 1987, Journal of animal science.

[18]  Y. Lee Early-Postmortem Measurements and Conditioning in Assessing and Enhancing Meat Quality , 1986 .

[19]  M. Dikeman,et al.  Longissimus muscle quality, palatability and connective tissue histological characteristics of bulls and steers fed different energy levels and slaughtered at four ages. , 1986, Journal of animal science.

[20]  T. W. Perry,et al.  Palatability and Muscle Properties of Beef as Influenced by Preslaughter Growth Rate , 1985 .

[21]  M. Dikeman,et al.  Accelerated versus Conventional Beef Production and Processing , 1985 .

[22]  E. Dransfield,et al.  Comparison of eating quality of bull and steer beef , 1984 .

[23]  H. R. Cross,et al.  Utilization of the Intact Male for Red Meat Production: A Review , 1982 .

[24]  G. L. Cook,et al.  A comparison of different breeds and crosses from the suckler herd 2. Carcass characteristics , 1982 .

[25]  T. W. Perry,et al.  Palatability and Muscle Characteristics of Cattle with Controlled Weight Gain: Time on a High Energy Diet , 1981 .

[26]  H. Venter,et al.  The influence of age, sex and breed of cattle on their muscle characteristics. , 1979, Meat science.

[27]  J. Prescott,et al.  A consumer test of bull vs steer beef , 1978 .

[28]  R. M. Koch,et al.  Carcass Composition, Quality and Palatability Attributes of Bulls and Steers Fed Different Energy Levels and Killed at Four Ages1 ,2 , 1977 .

[29]  J. O. Reagan,et al.  Age-Related Traits Affecting the Tenderness of the Bovine Longissimus Muscle , 1976 .

[30]  R. L. Joseph,et al.  Tenderness of bull and steer beef , 1974 .

[31]  R. L. Vetter,et al.  Effects of Age and Sex on Quality, Tenderness and Collagen Content of Bovine Longissimus Muscle , 1971 .

[32]  P. J. Broadbent,et al.  The evaluation of a device for feeding group-housed animals individually † , 1970 .

[33]  E. Larmond,et al.  APPLICATION OF MULTIPLE PAIRED COMPARISONS IN STUDYING THE EFFECT OF AGING AND FINISH ON BEEF TENDERNESS , 1969 .

[34]  R. Field,et al.  Effects of Age, Marbling and Sex on Palatability of Beef , 1966 .