Real-time emissions from construction equipment compared with model predictions

The construction industry is a large source of greenhouse gases and other air pollutants. Measuring and monitoring real-time emissions will provide practitioners with information to assess environmental impacts and improve the sustainability of construction. We employed a portable emission measurement system (PEMS) for real-time measurement of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), hydrocarbon, and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions from construction equipment to derive emission rates (mass of pollutant emitted per unit time) and emission factors (mass of pollutant emitted per unit volume of fuel consumed) under real-world operating conditions. Measurements were compared with emissions predicted by methodologies used in three models: NONROAD2008, OFFROAD2011, and a modal statistical model. Measured emission rates agreed with model predictions for some pieces of equipment but were up to 100 times lower for others. Much of the difference was driven by lower fuel consumption rates than predicted. Emission factors during idling and hauling were significantly different from each other and from those of other moving activities, such as digging and dumping. It appears that operating conditions introduce considerable variability in emission factors. Results of this research will aid researchers and practitioners in improving current emission estimation techniques, frameworks, and databases. Implications: Construction equipment is an important source of air pollutant emissions. There are large uncertainties in estimates of emissions from construction equipment, partly due to the small number of published measurements. The authors have expanded the database by measuring emissions of CO2, NOx, hydrocarbons, and CO from construction equipment under actual operating conditions on-site. There were large discrepancies between measured emissions and those predicted by models, including NONROAD and OFFROAD. Emission factors associated with idling and hauling were significantly different from each other and from those of other activities. These results can be used to improve the next generation of emission estimation models.

[1]  Mani Golparvar-Fard,et al.  The Application of Visualization for Construction Emission Monitoring , 2010 .

[2]  William Rasdorf,et al.  Impact of Engine Idling on Fuel Use and CO2 Emissions of Nonroad Diesel Construction Equipment , 2012 .

[3]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Requirements and Incentives for Reducing Construction Vehicle Emissions and Comparison of Nonroad Diesel Engine Emissions Data Sources , 2009 .

[4]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Development and Use of Emissions Inventories for Construction Vehicles , 2009 .

[5]  Michael Phil Lewis.  Estimating fuel use and emission rates of nonroad diesel construction equipment performing representative duty cycles , 2009 .

[6]  Carl Ensfield,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of portable emissions measurement systems and federal reference methods for emissions from a back-up generator and a diesel truck operated on a chassis dynamometer. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Changbum R. Ahn,et al.  Importance of Operational Efficiency to Achieve Energy Efficiency and Exhaust Emission Reduction of Construction Operations , 2013 .

[8]  Apif M. Hajji,et al.  Development of productivity‐based estimating tool for energy and air emissions from earthwork construction activities , 2013 .

[9]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Comparison of Real-World Emissions of B20 Biodiesel versus Petroleum Diesel for Selected Nonroad Vehicles and Engine Tiers , 2008 .

[10]  C Hart,et al.  EPA's Onboard Analysis Shootout: Overview and Results , 2002 .

[11]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[12]  Mridul Gautam.  Testing for exhaust emissions of diesel powered off-road engines. , 2002 .

[13]  Bin Liang,et al.  Characteristics of typical non-road machinery emissions in China by using portable emission measurement system. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  J. Mauderly,et al.  Engine-Operating Load Influences Diesel Exhaust Composition and Cardiopulmonary and Immune Responses , 2011, Environmental health perspectives.

[15]  Megan Beardsley,et al.  Median Life, Annual Activity, and Load Factor Values for Nonroad Engine Emissions Modeling , 1998 .

[16]  Brett C. Singer,et al.  A fuel-based inventory of motor vehicle exhaust emissions in the Los Angeles area during summer 1997 , 2000 .

[17]  Elise Miller-Hooks,et al.  Carbon Footprint Estimation Tool for Transportation Construction Projects , 2013 .

[18]  Y. A. B I S H O P,et al.  The Effects of Altitude on Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck On-Road Emissions , 2022 .

[19]  Oa Us Epa.  Climate Change Indicators in the United States , 2015 .

[20]  William Rasdorf,et al.  Effects of Engine Idling on National Ambient Air Quality Standards Criteria Pollutant Emissions from Nonroad Diesel Construction Equipment , 2012 .

[21]  David F. May.  On-vehicle emissions testing system. , 2003 .

[22]  Dev Millstein,et al.  Revised estimates of construction activity and emissions: Effects on ozone and elemental carbon concentrations in southern California , 2009 .

[23]  H Christopher Frey,et al.  On-Road Measurement of Vehicle Tailpipe Emissions Using a Portable Instrument , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[24]  Mani Golparvar-Fard,et al.  Automated Benchmarking and Monitoring of an Earthmoving Operation's Carbon Footprint Using Video Cameras and a Greenhouse Gas Estimation Model , 2012 .

[25]  Mitch Cumberworth,et al.  EPA ' s Plan for MOVES : A Comprehensive Mobile Source Emissions Model , 2002 .

[26]  H Christopher Frey,et al.  Real-World In-Use Activity, Fuel Use, and Emissions for Nonroad Construction Vehicles: A Case Study for Excavators , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[27]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Evaluation of On-Site Fuel Use and Emissions over the Duration of a Commercial Building Project , 2012 .

[28]  Nigel N. Clark,et al.  Idle Emissions from Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles: Review and Recent Data , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[29]  Hong-xian Li,et al.  Implementation of Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) in estimating & analyzing CO2 emission during earthwork of building construction engineering , 2010, 2010 IEEE 17Th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[30]  Octavio Armas,et al.  Online Emissions from a Vibrating Roller Using an Ethanol−Diesel Blend during a Railway Construction , 2009 .

[31]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Engine and Duty Cycle Variability in Diesel Construction Equipment Emissions , 2013 .

[32]  G. Bishop,et al.  The effects of altitude on heavy-duty diesel truck on-road emissions. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Nigel N Clark,et al.  Factors Affecting Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle Emissions , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[34]  N. Clark,et al.  Emissions from nine heavy trucks fueled by diesel and biodiesel blend without engine modification , 2000 .

[35]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Comprehensive Field Study of Fuel Use and Emissions of Nonroad Diesel Construction Equipment , 2010 .