Identifying robust response options to manage environmental change using an Ecosystem Approach: A stress-testing case study for the UK

A diverse range of response options was evaluated in terms of their utility for sustaining ecosystem services in the UK. Robustness of response options was investigated by applying a ‘stress-testing’ method which evaluated expected performance against combined scenarios of socioeconomic and climate change. Based upon stakeholder feedback, a reference scenario representing current trends in climate and socioeconomic drivers (‘business-as-usual’) was used as a dynamic baseline against which to compare results of other scenarios. The robustness of response options was evaluated by their utility in different environmental and social contexts as represented by the scenarios, and linked to their adaptability to adjust to changing conditions. Key findings demonstrate that adaptability becomes increasingly valuable as the magnitude and rate of future change diverges from current trends. Stress-testing also revealed that individual responses in isolation are unlikely to be robust meaning there are advantages from integrating cohesive combinations (bundles) of response options to maximise their individual strengths and compensate for weaknesses. This identifies a role for both top-down and bottom-up responses, including regulation, spatial targeting, incentives and partnership initiatives, and their use in combination through integrated assessment and planning consistent with the adoption of an Ecosystem Approach. Stress-testing approaches can have an important role in future-proofing policy appraisals but important knowledge gaps remain, especially for cultural and supporting ecosystem services. Finally, barriers and enablers to the implementation of more integrated long-term adaptive responses were identified drawing on the ‘4 Is’ (Institutions, Information, Incentives, Identity) conceptual framework. This highlighted the crucial but usually understated role of identity in promoting ownership and uptake of responses.

[1]  J. Hertin,et al.  Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as ‘learning machines’ , 2002 .

[2]  M. Hulme,et al.  Assessing the robustness of adaptation decisions to climate change uncertainties: A case study on water resources management in the East of England , 2007 .

[3]  Claudia Sattler,et al.  Multi-classification of payments for ecosystem services: How do classification characteristics relate to overall PES success? , 2013 .

[4]  R. DeFries,et al.  Anthropogenic Drivers of Ecosystem Change: an Overview , 2006 .

[5]  Matthew D. Collins,et al.  UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change Projections , 2009 .

[6]  Mario Quagliariello,et al.  Stress Testing the Banking System: Methodologies and Applications , 2009 .

[7]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Decision-making under great uncertainty: environmental management in an era of global change. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  R. Kates,et al.  Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  C. Reid.  Between Priceless and Worthless: Challenges in Using Market Mechanisms for Conserving Biodiversity† , 2012, Transnational Environmental Law.

[10]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  J. Couwenberg,et al.  Investing in nature: Developing ecosystem service markets for peatland restoration , 2014 .

[12]  Derek Armitage,et al.  A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world , 2007 .

[13]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: Setting the research agenda , 2013 .

[14]  A. Newton,et al.  Does landscape-scale conservation management enhance the provision of ecosystem services? , 2014 .

[15]  C. Lindblom.  THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[16]  Thomas J. Chermack,et al.  The role of constructivist learning in scenario planning , 2003 .

[17]  Rob J.F. Burton,et al.  Exploring Farmers' Cultural Resistance to Voluntary Agri-environmental Schemes , 2008 .

[18]  Esther Eidinow,et al.  Evolving practices in environmental scenarios: a new scenario typology , 2008 .

[19]  Michael Howlett.  Why are policy innovations rare and so often negative? Blame avoidance and problem denial in climate change policy-making , 2014 .

[20]  J. Gonzalez,et al.  Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  Ahindra Ghosh,et al.  Ecosystems and Human Well-Being , 2013 .

[22]  N. Hanley,et al.  Improving the link between payments and the provision of ecosystem services in agri-environment schemes , 2014 .

[23]  Myles T. Collins,et al.  Managing the Risk of Uncertain Threshold Responses: Comparison of Robust, Optimum, and Precautionary Approaches , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  Robert Fish,et al.  What are shared and social values of ecosystems , 2015 .

[25]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services , 2012 .

[26]  S. Dufour,et al.  From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits , 2009 .

[27]  I. Brown,et al.  Scenario analysis for regional decision-making on sustainable multifunctional land uses , 2014, Regional Environmental Change.

[28]  P. Raskin,et al.  Author ' s personal copy METHODS World lines : A framework for exploring global pathways , 2008 .

[29]  H. Simon.  Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[30]  Lutz E. Schlange.  Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[31]  C. Folke,et al.  Adaptive Comanagement for Building Resilience in Social–Ecological Systems , 2004, Environmental management.

[32]  C. Lindblom.  Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. , 1979 .

[33]  M. Gaterell,et al.  Scenario Archetypes: Converging rather than Diverging Themes , 2011 .

[34]  J. Kiesecker,et al.  Policy Development for Biodiversity Offsets: A Review of Offset Frameworks , 2010, Environmental management.

[35]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  An updated scenario typology , 2003 .

[36]  Y. Chee.  An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services , 2004 .

[37]  S. John,et al.  Making Space for Nature: A review of England's Wildlife Sites and Ecological Network , 2010 .

[38]  Thomas J. Chermack,et al.  Improving decision-making with scenario planning , 2004 .

[39]  Alex Farrell,et al.  Environmental assessments: four under-appreciated elements of design , 2001 .

[40]  Mark Gaterell,et al.  Scenario Archetypes: Converging rather than Diverging Themes , 2011 .

[41]  L. Esteves.  Is managed realignment a sustainable long-term coastal management approach? , 2013 .

[42]  Axel Volkery,et al.  Your Vision or My Model? Lessons from Participatory Land Use Scenario Development on a European Scale , 2008 .

[43]  I. Brown,et al.  A working typology of response options to manage environmental change and their scope for complementarity using an Ecosystem Approach , 2015 .

[44]  Michael Elliott,et al.  Managing the Marine Environment: Is the DPSIR Framework Holistic Enough? , 2011 .

[45]  S. Wunder,et al.  Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues , 2008 .

[46]  Clare Harries,et al.  Correspondence to what? Coherence to what? What is good scenario-based decision making? , 2003 .

[47]  R. Lejano,et al.  Norm, network, and commons: The invisible hand of community , 2014 .

[48]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services , 2006 .

[49]  Mark Van Vugt,et al.  Science Current Directions in Psychological Averting the Tragedy of the Commons : Using Social Psychological Science to Protect the Environment on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[50]  I. Fazey,et al.  Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response , 2014 .

[51]  V. Dakos,et al.  Toward Principles for Enhancing the Resilience of Ecosystem Services , 2012 .

[52]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Scenarios for Ecosystem Services: An Overview , 2006 .

[53]  Robert Fildes.  Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[54]  O. Young.  Effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Existing knowledge, cutting-edge themes, and research strategies , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  A. Jordan,et al.  Proceeding in Parallel or Drifting Apart? A Systematic Review of Policy Appraisal Research and Practices , 2012 .

[56]  Jonathan W. N. Smith,et al.  Benchmarking of Decision-Support Tools Used for Tiered Sustainable Remediation Appraisal , 2013, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution.

[57]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Framing climate uncertainty: socio-economic and climate scenarios in vulnerability and adaptation assessments , 2013, Regional Environmental Change.

[58]  K. Chan,et al.  Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values , 2012 .

[59]  Stephane Hallegatte,et al.  Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change , 2008 .

[60]  S. Wynne‐Jones.  Carbon blinkers and policy blindness: The difficulties of ‘Growing Our Woodland in Wales’ , 2013 .

[61]  C. S. Holling.  Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems , 2001, Ecosystems.

[62]  Muhammad Amer,et al.  A review of scenario planning , 2013 .

[63]  Y. Trope,et al.  The Psychology of Transcending the Here and Now , 2008, Science.

[64]  E. Ostrom.  Collective action and the evolution of social norms , 2000, Journal of Economic Perspectives.

[65]  Mark P. Johnson,et al.  Protected Areas in Europe , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[66]  E. Ostrom.  Collective action and the evolution of social norms , 2000, Journal of Economic Perspectives.

[67]  L. Lundy,et al.  Integrating sciences to sustain urban ecosystem services , 2011 .

[68]  N. Roese.  Counterfactual thinking. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[69]  S. Pauleit,et al.  From Multifunctionality to Multiple Ecosystem Services? A Conceptual Framework for Multifunctionality in Green Infrastructure Planning for Urban Areas , 2014, AMBIO.

[70]  R. Selten,et al.  Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox , 2000 .

[71]  Anna R. Davies.  Power, politics and networks: shaping partnerships for sustainable communities , 2002 .

[72]  C. Holling,et al.  Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resource Management , 1996 .

[73]  C. Folke,et al.  ADAPTIVE CO-MANAGEMENT FOR BUILDING RESILIENCE IN SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2003 .

[74]  R. Pielke,et al.  The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .

[75]  R. D. de Groot,et al.  Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[76]  S. Hinsley,et al.  Social and ecological drivers of success in agri‐environment schemes: the roles of farmers and environmental context , 2015 .

[77]  K. Gaston,et al.  Local Scale Comparisons of Biodiversity as a Test for Global Protected Area Ecological Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[78]  C. Quine,et al.  PRACTITIONER'S PERSPECTIVE: Sustainable forest management in a time of ecosystem services frameworks: common ground and consequences , 2013, The Journal of applied ecology.

[79]  F. Maestre,et al.  Ecosystem structure, function, and restoration success: Are they related? , 2006 .

[80]  Steve Bankes,et al.  Exploratory Modeling for Policy Analysis , 1993, Oper. Res..

[81]  J. Rowan,et al.  Evaluating wider benefits of natural flood management strategies: an ecosystem-based adaptation perspective , 2014 .

[82]  Ioan Fazey,et al.  Adaptation strategies for reducing vulnerability to future environmental change , 2010 .

[83]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: Toward adaptive water governance in river basins , 2012 .

[84]  E. Gómez‐Baggethun,et al.  Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning , 2013 .

[85]  E. Oteros‐Rozas,et al.  Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level , 2013 .

[86]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[87]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Outcomes of Collaborative Water Policy Making: Applying Complexity Thinking to Evaluation , 2001 .

[88]  M. Pelling.  Adaptation to Climate Change: From Resilience to Transformation , 2010 .

[89]  A. Newton,et al.  Cost–benefit analysis of ecological networks assessed through spatial analysis of ecosystem services , 2012 .

[90]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[91]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Bounding the future: The use of scenarios in assessing climate change impacts , 2011 .

[92]  L. Hannah.  Protected Areas and Climate Change , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.