Benchmarking and Sustainable Transport Policy: Learning from the BEST Network

Abstract Benchmarking is a widely used method of comparing performances and practices in order to learn from the best. In 2000, the so‐called ‘BEST network’ was set up to explore benchmarking as a tool to promote policies for ‘sustainable transport’. This paper reports the findings and recommendations from the BEST experience on how to address this challenge. The findings suggest that benchmarking is a valuable tool that may indeed help to move forward the transport policy agenda. However, there are major conditions and limitations. First, it is often not straightforward to measure and compare transport services in order to establish a clear benchmark. Second, ‘sustainable transport’ evokes a broad range of sometimes conflicting concerns that are hard to address fully at the level of specific organizational practices. Third, policies are not directly comparable across contexts. Attempting to benchmark ‘sustainable transport policies’ against one another would therefore be a highly complex task, which is not advised. Several other ways in which benchmarking and policy can support one another are identified in the analysis. This leads to a range of recommended initiatives to exploit the benefits of benchmarking for sustainable transport policy while avoiding some of the lurking pitfalls.

[1]  R. Auluck,et al.  Benchmarking: a tool for facilitating organizational learning? , 2002 .

[2]  J. B. Polak,et al.  European Transport Economics , 1993 .

[3]  Mahmoud M. Yasin,et al.  The theory and practice of benchmarking: then and now , 2002 .

[4]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Total Organizational Excellence: Achieving world-class performance , 1999 .

[5]  Handley Stevens,et al.  Transport policy in the European Union , 2004 .

[6]  J. R. Ybema,et al.  International CO2 policy benchmark for the road transport sector. Results of a pilot study , 2003 .

[7]  Jeremy Richardson,et al.  Policy Styles in Western Europe , 1982 .

[8]  H. Gudmundsson Making concepts matter: Sustainable mobility and indicator systems in transport policy , 2003 .

[9]  G. Vigar The Politics of Mobility: Transport, the Environment, and Public Policy , 2002 .

[10]  Michael Schmidt,et al.  Successes, Failures and Prospects for the Common Transport Policy , 2001 .

[11]  Tomas Kåberger,et al.  Making transport systems sustainable , 2002 .

[12]  Henrik Gudmundsson BENCHMARKING & EUROPEAN SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT POLICIES , 2003 .

[13]  Ann Dom,et al.  Paving the way for EU enlargement : indicators of transport and environment integration, TERM 2002 : summary , 2002 .

[14]  Nathalie Liamine,et al.  European Environment Agency , 2002 .

[15]  R Deiss BENCHMARKING EUROPEAN TRANSPORT , 2000 .

[16]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Institutional issues in transport systems , 1997 .

[17]  Matthew Hinton,et al.  A vehicle for change?: A case study of performance improvement in the “new” public sector , 1999 .

[18]  Milan Janic,et al.  Integrated transport systems in the European Union: An overview of some recent developments , 2001 .

[19]  The future development of the common transport policy , 2022 .

[20]  G Baerlund BENCHMARKING IN TRANSPORT , 2000 .

[21]  G Barlund BENCHMARKING IN TRANSPORT , 2000 .

[22]  W. Wolf Transport Policy in the European Union , 2006 .

[23]  P Davies,et al.  The Campbell Collaboration , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.