A consensus approach to diagnosing coronary artery disease based on clinical and exercise test data.

OBJECTIVE To demonstrate that a consensus approach for combining prediction equations based on clinical and exercise test variables derived from different populations can stratify patients referred for possible coronary artery disease (CAD) into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with complete data from exercise testing and coronary angiography referred for evaluation of possible CAD. After derivation of a logistic equation in our own training set of patients, this equation, along with two other equations developed independently by other investigators, was validated in a test set. The validation strategy for the consensus approach included the following: (1) calculation of probability scores for each patient using each logistic equation independently; (2) determination of probability thresholds in the training set to divide the patients into three groups-low risk (prevalence CAD <5%), intermediate risk (5 to 70%), and high risk (>70% prevalence of CAD); (3) using agreement among at least two of three of the prediction equations to generate "consensus" for each patient; and (4) application of the consensus approach thresholds to the test set of patients. SETTINGS Two university-affiliated Veteran's Affairs medical centers. PATIENTS We studied 718 consecutive men between 1985 and 1995 who had coronary angiography within 3 months of an exercise treadmill test for suspected CAD. The population was randomly divided into a training set of 429 patients and a test set of 289 patients. Patients with previous myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass surgery, valvular heart disease, left bundle branch block, or any Q waves present on their resting ECG were excluded from the study. MEASUREMENTS Recording of clinical and exercise test data along with visual interpretation of the ECG recordings on standardized forms and abstraction of visually interpreted angiographic data from clinical catheterization reports. RESULTS We demonstrated that by using simple clinical and exercise test variables, we could improve on the standard use of ECG criteria during exercise testing for diagnosing CAD. Using the consensus approach divided the test set into populations with low, intermediate, and high risk for CAD. Since the patients in the intermediate group would be sent for further testing and would eventually be correctly classified, the sensitivity of the consensus approach is 94% and the specificity is 92%. The consensus approach controls for varying disease prevalence, missing data, inconsistency in variable definition, and varying angiographic criterion for stenosis severity. The percent of correct diagnoses increased from the 67% for standard exercise ECG analysis and from the 80% for multivariable predictive equations alone to >90% correct diagnoses for the consensus approach. CONCLUSIONS The consensus approach has made population-specific logistic regression equations portable to other populations. Excellent diagnostic characteristics can be obtained using simple data and measurements. The consensus approach is best applied utilizing a programmable calculator or a computer program to simplify the process of calculating the probability of CAD using the three equations.

[1]  V. Froelicher,et al.  Exercise standards. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. , 1990, Circulation.

[2]  T. Ryan,et al.  Identification of patients with left main and three vessel coronary disease with clinical and exercise test variables. , 1980, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  V. Froelicher,et al.  Effect of β-blockade on the interpretation of the exercise ECG: ST level versus Δ STHR index , 1991 .

[4]  B. Chaitman,et al.  A logistic regression analysis of multiple noninvasive tests for the prediction of the presence and extent of coronary artery disease in men. , 1985, American heart journal.

[5]  R. Helfant,et al.  A sequential approach to the diagnosis of coronary artery disease using multivariate analysis. , 1985, American heart journal.

[6]  F. Tristani,et al.  Diagnostic Quantification of CASS (Coronary Artery Surgery Study) Clinical and Exercise Test Results in Determining Presence and Extent of Coronary Artery Disease: A Multivariate Approach , 1981, Circulation.

[7]  P. Cohn,et al.  A Multivariate Approach for Interpreting Treadmill Exercise Tests in Coronary Artery Disease , 1978, Circulation.

[8]  R. Wilson,et al.  Methods of measurement of myocardial blood flow in patients: a critical review. , 1987, Circulation.

[9]  F. Harrell,et al.  Exercise treadmill score for predicting prognosis in coronary artery disease. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[10]  G. Diamond,et al.  Incremental value of exercise electrocardiography and thallium-201 testing in men and women for the presence and extent of coronary artery disease. , 1995, American heart journal.

[11]  K. Bailey,et al.  Exercise Tomographic Thallium-201 Imaging in Patients with Severe Coronary Artery Disease and Normal Electrocardiograms , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  V. Froelicher,et al.  A nomogram to predict exercise capacity from a specific activity questionnaire and clinical data. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  V. Froelicher,et al.  Exercise standards. A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group. , 1995, Circulation.

[14]  V. Froelicher,et al.  Review of studies using multivariable analysis of clinical and exercise test data to predict angiographic coronary artery disease. , 1997, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[15]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good. , 1995, JAMA.

[16]  R. Detrano,et al.  Computer probability estimates of angiographic coronary artery disease: transportability and comparison with cardiologists' estimates. , 1992, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[17]  Robert Califf,et al.  Value of the History and Physical in Identifying Patients at Increased Risk for Coronary Artery Disease , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  R D Cebul,et al.  The importance of disease prevalence in transporting clinical prediction rules. The case of streptococcal pharyngitis. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[19]  S. E. Logan,et al.  On the Fluid Mechanics of Human Coronary Artery Stenosis , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  V. Froelicher,et al.  Comparison of Computerized and Standard Visual Criteria of Exercise ECG for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease , 1996 .

[21]  J. Allen,et al.  Estimating probability of coronary artery disease. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  E. Cook,et al.  Incremental Value of the Exercise Test for Diagnosing the Presence or Absence of Coronary Artery Disease , 1982, Circulation.

[23]  A. Zinsmeister,et al.  Identification of severe coronary artery disease using simple clinical parameters. , 1992, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  M Bobbio,et al.  Development and validation of a logistic regression-derived algorithm for estimating the incremental probability of coronary artery disease before and after exercise testing. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.