Treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: current practice variations

The treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematous (CLE) remains a challenge. Most of the therapeutic options used in CLE have not been tested in randomized controlled studies and to date no agent has been approved. Therefore, CLE treatment is mostly based on personal experience. To better characterize therapeutic habits among physicians treating CLE patients, a questionnaire-based study about various aspects of topical and systemic treatment for CLE has been performed. The questionnaire was distributed among CLE experts, mostly from Japan, the USA, and Europe. A total of 82 completed questionnaires were assessed. High-potent and potent corticosteroids as well as calcineurin inhibitors were the most often recommended topical treatment for all CLE subtypes. The most relevant factors for initiation of systemic therapy were severity of skin lesions, concomitant involvement of internal organs, CLE subtype and lack of response to topical therapies. Corticosteroids and antimalarials were considered as the most suitable and effective systemic drugs for CLE patients. However, significant differences were observed between various CLE subtypes and between different countries regarding the assessment of various topical and systemic treatment options. In conclusion, great variability of obtained answers underlines the need of development of CLE treatment guidelines suitable for different disease subtypes.

[1]  J. Szepietowski,et al.  From pathogenesis, epidemiology, and genetics to definitions, diagnosis, and treatments of cutaneous lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis: A report from the 3rd International Conference on Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (ICCLE) 2013 , 2015, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[2]  K. Propert,et al.  Lenalidomide in treatment-refractory cutaneous lupus erythematosus: Efficacy and safety in a 52-week trial. , 2014, Journal of American Academy of Dermatology.

[3]  A. Bengtsson,et al.  Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple intravenous, dose-ascending study of sirukumab in cutaneous or systemic lupus erythematosus. , 2013, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  C. Deligny,et al.  Pure cutaneous lupus erythematosus in a population of African descent in French Guiana: a retrospective population-based description , 2012, Lupus.

[5]  P. Janjumratsang,et al.  A comparative study in efficacy and safety of 0.1% tacrolimus and 0.05% clobetasol propionate ointment in discoid lupus erythematosus by modified cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease area and severity index. , 2012, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[6]  J. Clarke Photoprotective effects of a broad-spectrum sunscreen in ultraviolet-induced cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A randomized, vehicle-controlled, double-blind study , 2012 .

[7]  J. Q. Rosso,et al.  Efficacy of tacrolimus 0.1% ointment in cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial , 2012 .

[8]  G. Jemec,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of R‐salbutamol for topical treatment of discoid lupus erythematosus , 2009, The British journal of dermatology.

[9]  B. Barikbin,et al.  Pimecrolimus 1% cream versus betamethasone 17‐valerate 0.1% cream in the treatment of facial discoid lupus erythematosus: a double‐blind, randomized pilot study , 2009, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[10]  S. Jessop,et al.  Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  Tzung Ty,et al.  Tacrolimus vs. clobetasol propionate in the treatment of facial cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a randomized, double-blind, bilateral comparison study. , 2007 .

[12]  T. Ruzicka,et al.  Classification of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus , 2005 .

[13]  S. Ballou,et al.  Clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus: differences related to race and age of onset. , 1982, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[14]  R. Sontheimer,et al.  Distinctive cutaneous subsets in the spectrum of lupus erythematosus. , 1981, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.