A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the subjective image quality, image noise, and radiation dose of chest CT images reconstructed with a 30% blend of iterative reconstruction and 70% conventional filtered back projection (FBP) with those of images generated with 100% FBP. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Clinically indicated chest CT examinations of 292 consecutively registered patients were prospectively alternately assigned to two scanners on which different reconstruction techniques were used: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) blended with FBP and 100% FBP. Both acquisitions were performed with dose modulation (noise index, 25 for ASIR and 21 for FBP). Patient demographics and habitus were recorded. Two radiologists blinded to the reconstruction algorithm independently scored subjective image quality on a 3-point Likert scale and measured image noise and radiation dose. RESULTS Compared with FBP images, ASIR images had significantly lower subjective image quality (p = 0.01), less image noise (p = 0.02), and less radiation dose (p < 0.0001). The CT dose index of the ASIR cohort (11.3 ± 51) was significantly lower than that of the 100% FBP cohort (15.4 ± 6.3) (p < 0.0001). Interobserver agreement on subjective image quality was excellent for both ASIR and FBP (Cronbach α, 0.92, p < 0.0001; Cronbach α, 0.85, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION In clinically indicated chest CT examinations, ASIR images had better image quality and less image noise at a lower radiation dose than images acquired with a conventional FBP reconstruction algorithm.

[1]  Allen J. Taylor,et al.  Effect of hybrid iterative reconstruction technique on quantitative and qualitative image analysis at 256-slice prospective gating cardiac CT , 2012, European Radiology.

[2]  C A Kelsey,et al.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose , 2000, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[3]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Reducing Body Radiation Dose at Ct: Feasibility Study Hara Et Al. Ct Iterative Reconstruction Technique Gastrointestinal Imaging Original Research , 2022 .

[4]  Masaki Katsura,et al.  Effect of radiation dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on image quality of pulmonary computed tomography , 2011, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[5]  Michael F McNitt-Gray,et al.  AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  J Y Wang,et al.  A new iterative algorithm to reconstruct the refractive index , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  T. Flohr,et al.  Iterative image reconstruction techniques: Applications for cardiac CT. , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[8]  M. Defrise,et al.  Iterative reconstruction for helical CT: a simulation study. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a review. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  K. Nishizawa,et al.  [Survey of CT practice in Japan and collective effective dose estimation]. , 2004, Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica.

[11]  T. Yoshizumi,et al.  Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources--1950-2007. , 2009, Radiology.

[12]  Lin Cheng,et al.  Fast Iterative Adaptive Reconstruction in Low-Dose CT Imaging , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[13]  F. Wacker,et al.  Influence of Multiplanar Reformations on Low-Contrast Performance in Thin-Collimated Multidetector Computed Tomography , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[14]  M. Kalra,et al.  Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[15]  Rebalancing the risks of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance imaging , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[16]  F. Gudinchet,et al.  Paediatric cardiac CT examinations: impact of the iterative reconstruction method ASIR on image quality – preliminary findings , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[17]  Ashok Panigrahy,et al.  Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique in children: a feasibility study , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[18]  Mannudeep K Kalra,et al.  Scanning beyond anatomic limits of the thorax in chest CT: findings, radiation dose, and automatic tube current modulation. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Excess radiation and organ dose in chest and abdominal CT due to CT acquisition beyond expected anatomical boundaries , 2012, European Radiology.

[21]  S. Halliburton,et al.  Low-Dose Cardiovascular Computed Tomography: Where are the Limits? , 2012, Current Cardiology Reports.

[22]  J. Mayo,et al.  Radiation exposure at chest CT: a statement of the Fleischner Society. , 2003, Radiology.

[23]  M. Kalra,et al.  Application of Rational Practice and Technical Advances for Optimizing Radiation Dose for Chest CT , 2004, Journal of thoracic imaging.