The development of an automatic method of safety monitoring at Pelican crossings.

This paper reports on the development of a method for automatic monitoring of safety at Pelican crossings. Historically, safety monitoring has typically been carried out using accident data, though given the rarity of such events it is difficult to quickly detect change in accident risk at a particular site. An alternative indicator sometimes used is traffic conflicts, though this data can be time consuming and expensive to collect. The method developed in this paper uses vehicle speeds and decelerations collected using standard in situ loops and tubes, to determine conflicts using vehicle decelerations and to assess the possibility of automatic safety monitoring at Pelican crossings. Information on signal settings, driver crossing behaviour, pedestrian crossing behaviour and delays, and pedestrian-vehicle conflicts was collected synchronously through a combination of direct observation, video analysis, and analysis of output from tube and loop detectors. Models were developed to predict safety, i.e. pedestrian-vehicle conflicts using vehicle speeds and decelerations.

[1]  Dominique Lord,et al.  Analysis of Pedestrian Conflicts with Left-Turning Traffic , 1996 .

[2]  Ian Howarth Interactions Between Drivers and Pedestrians: Some New Approaches to Pedestrian Safety , 1985 .

[3]  P. J. Cooper,et al.  EXPERIENCE WITH TRAFFIC CONFLICTS IN CANADA WITH EMPHASIS ON "POST ENCROACHMENT TIME" TECHNIQUES .INTERNATIONAL CALIBRATION STUDY OF TRAFFIC CONFLICTS. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATO ADVANCED RESEARCH WORKSHOP , 1984 .

[4]  J. Stewart,et al.  Safety effects of marked vs unmarked crosswalks at uncontrolled locations: executive summary and recommended guidelines , 2002 .

[5]  Talib Rothengatter,et al.  Road user behaviour, theory and research , 1988 .

[6]  A. Horst A time-based analysis of road user behaviour in normal and critical encounters , 1990 .

[7]  A Wilmink,et al.  Drivers' decision-making at signalised intersections: an optimisation of the yellow timing , 1986 .

[8]  A Várhelyi,et al.  Drivers' speed behaviour at a zebra crossing: a case study. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Ara Van Der Horst,et al.  TIME-TO-COLLISION AND DRIVER DECISION-MAKING IN BRAKING , 1989 .

[10]  R Allsop,et al.  IHT GUIDELINES FOR: URBAN SAFETY MANAGEMENT , 1990 .

[11]  Hugo Pietrantonio,et al.  PARAMETERS FOR EVALUATING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY PROBLEMS IN SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS USING THE TRAFFIC CONFLICT ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE – A STUDY IN SÃO PAULO, BRAZIL. by , 2003 .

[12]  N. Matthews,et al.  First year report , 1992 .

[13]  Brian L Allen,et al.  ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC CONFLICTS AND COLLISIONS , 1978 .

[14]  Robert H Wortman,et al.  An evaluation of vehicle deceleration profiles , 1994 .

[15]  John C Hayward,et al.  NEAR-MISS DETERMINATION THROUGH USE OF A SCALE OF DANGER , 1972 .

[16]  William MacKay Transport in the Urban Environment , 1997 .

[17]  M Livneh,et al.  A quantitative definition of the near-accident concept , 1979 .

[18]  Stuart R Perkins,et al.  Traffic conflict characteristics-accident potential at intersections , 1968 .

[19]  Åse Svensson,et al.  A method for analysing the traffic process in a safety perspective , 1998 .

[20]  C. Hydén THE DEVELOPMENT OF A METHOD FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY EVALUATION: THE SWEDISH TRAFFIC CONFLICTS TECHNIQUE , 1987 .