Effect of ultra-high injection pressure on diesel ignition and flame under high-boost conditions

In this work, we conducted three-dimensional numerical simulations to investigate the effect of ultra-high injection pressure on diesel ignition and flame under high-boost and medium-load conditions. Three injection cases employed in experiments with a multi-cylinder Volvo D12 engine were applied for validation. The simulations were performed using the KIVA-3V code, with a Kelvin-Helmholz/Rayleigh-Taylor (KH/RT) spray breakup model and a diesel surrogate mechanism involving 83 species and 445 reactions. A range of higher injection pressure levels were projected and the injection rates estimated for the current study. Three different rate shapes of injection were projected and investigated as well. All the projected injection events start at top dead center (TDC). Computations demonstrate that high-pressure injection strongly affects engine ignition and combustion. An increase in injection pressure leads to reduced ignition delay time, higher in-cylinder pressure peak, advanced combustion phasing, and faster flame propagation. The study found that the ultra-high pressure injection does not cause the flame lift-off length in the engine to increase, the trend of which seems to be contradictory to the observations obtained from the studies in high-pressure, high-temperature constant-volume vessels. While the burn durations reduced with an increase in injection pressure, the simulations of three different injection rate shapes suggest that the rate-falling injection leads to a shorter, early (10-30%) burn duration angle but a longer, late (70-90%) burn angle. The prediction indicates that the engine has a relatively larger flame area of higher temperature in the late cycle for the rate-rising injection than for the rate-falling one. The existence of higher temperature in the late engine cycle may be beneficial to soot oxidation. On the other hand, the simulations show that higher injection pressure results in a faster NO production rate in the early phase of combustion but leads to a lower NO peak level. The rate-rising injection lowers NO production compared with the other two injection strategies.

[1]  R. Borghi Turbulent combustion modelling , 1988 .

[2]  Anders Larsson,et al.  Optical Studies in a DI Diesel Engine , 1999 .

[3]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Measurement of the Flame Lift-Off Location on DI Diesel Sprays Using OH Chemiluminescence , 2001 .

[4]  J. Chomiak,et al.  3-D Diesel Spray Simulations Using a New Detailed Chemistry Turbulent Combustion Model , 2000 .

[5]  THE INFLUENCE OF ORIFICE DIAMETER ON FLAME LIFT-OFF LENGTH , 2002 .

[6]  Mark P. B. Musculus,et al.  Effects of the In-Cylinder Environment on Diffusion Flame Lift-Off in a DI Diesel Engine , 2003 .

[7]  A. A. Amsden,et al.  KIVA-3V: A Block-Structured KIVA Program for Engines with Vertical or Canted Valves , 1997 .

[8]  Denis Veynante,et al.  Turbulent combustion modeling , 2002, VKI Lecture Series.

[9]  R. P. Lindstedt,et al.  DETAILED KINETIC MODELLING OF N-HEPTANE COMBUSTION , 1995 .

[10]  D. Spalding Mixing and chemical reaction in steady confined turbulent flames , 1971 .

[11]  H. Ciezki,et al.  Shock-tube investigation of self-ignition of n-heptane - Air mixtures under engine relevant conditions , 1993 .

[12]  Jerzy Chomiak,et al.  Numerical Investigation of Reaction Zone Structure and Flame Liftoff of DI Diesel Sprays with Complex Chemistry , 2002 .

[13]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Flame Lift-Off on Direct-Injection Diesel Fuel Jets: Oxygen Concentration Effects , 2002 .

[14]  Anders Karlsson,et al.  Flame liftoff in diesel sprays , 1996 .

[15]  Anders Karlsson Modeling Auto-Ignition, Flame Propagation and Combustion in Non-Stationary Turbulent Sprays , 1995 .

[16]  Thermal regimes of combustion , 1961 .

[17]  P. Nordin Complex Chemistry Modeling of Diesel Spray Combustion , 2001 .

[18]  R. Reitz Modeling atomization processes in high-pressure vaporizing sprays , 1987 .

[19]  J. Chomiak,et al.  Self-Ignition and Early Combustion Process of n-Heptane Sprays Under Diluted Air Conditions: Numerical Studies Based on Detailed Chemistry , 2000 .

[20]  D. Siebers,et al.  Effects of Injector Conditions on the Flame Lift-Off Length of DI Diesel Sprays , 2000 .

[21]  P. Roth,et al.  Shock tube study of the ignition of lean n-heptane/air mixtures at intermediate temperatures and high pressures , 2005 .

[22]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Flame Lift-Off on Direct-Injection Diesel Sprays Under Quiescent Conditions , 2001 .

[23]  Chih-Jen Sung,et al.  Laminar flame speeds of primary reference fuels and reformer gas mixtures , 2004 .

[24]  R. Reitz,et al.  Turbulence Modeling of Internal Combustion Engines Using RNG κ-ε Models , 1995 .

[25]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  MECHANISMS OF AIR-ASSISTED LIQUID ATOMIZATION , 1993 .

[26]  A. E. Bakali,et al.  Kinetic modeling of a rich, atmospheric pressure, premixed n-heptane/O2/N2 flame , 1999 .