Coloured noise or low - dimensional chaos?

Devising a method capable of distinguishing a low - dimensional chaotic signal that might be embedded in a noisy stochastic process has become a major challenge for those involved in time-series analysis. Here a null hypothesis approach is used in conjunction with a known nonlinear predictive test, to probe for the presence of chaos in epidemiological data. A probabilistic set of rules is used to simulate a historic record of New York City measles outbreaks, generally understood to be governed by a chaotic attractor. The simulated runs of 'surrogate data’ are carefully constructed so as to be free from any underlying low-dimensional chaotic process. They therefore serve as a useful null model against which to test the observed time series. However, despite the assumed differences between the dynamics of measles outbreaks and the null model, a nonlinear predictive scheme is found to be unable to differentiate between their characteristic time series. The methodology confirms that, if there is in fact a chaotic signal in the measles data, it is extremely difficult to detect in time series of such limited length. The results have general relevance to the analysis of physical, ecological and environmental time series.

[1]  H. Schuster Deterministic chaos: An introduction , 1984 .

[2]  D. Ruelle,et al.  Fundamental limitations for estimating dimensions and Lyapunov exponents in dynamical systems , 1992 .

[3]  Stuart L. Pimm,et al.  The variability of population densities , 1988, Nature.

[4]  M. Bartlett Chance or Chaos , 1990 .

[5]  A. Provenzale,et al.  Finite correlation dimension for stochastic systems with power-law spectra , 1989 .

[6]  E. Lorenz Dimension of weather and climate attractors , 1991, Nature.

[7]  G Sugihara,et al.  Distinguishing error from chaos in ecological time series. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  J. Doyne Farmer,et al.  Exploiting Chaos to Predict the Future and Reduce Noise , 1989 .

[9]  TheilerJames,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series , 1992 .

[10]  George Sugihara,et al.  Nonlinear forecasting as a way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series , 1990, Nature.

[11]  Leonard A. Smith Intrinsic limits on dimension calculations , 1988 .

[12]  John H. Steele,et al.  A comparison of terrestrial and marine ecological systems , 1985, Nature.

[13]  Paul H. Harvey,et al.  NULL MODELS IN ECOLOGY , 1983 .

[14]  Martin Casdagli,et al.  Nonlinear prediction of chaotic time series , 1989 .

[15]  秦 浩起,et al.  Characterization of Strange Attractor (カオスとその周辺(基研長期研究会報告)) , 1987 .

[16]  J. Yorke,et al.  Recurrent outbreaks of measles, chickenpox and mumps. I. Seasonal variation in contact rates. , 1973, American journal of epidemiology.

[17]  L. Olsen,et al.  Chaos versus noisy periodicity: alternative hypotheses for childhood epidemics. , 1990, Science.

[18]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[19]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Characterization of Strange Attractors , 1983 .

[20]  R. May,et al.  Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control , 1991, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  G. P. King,et al.  Extracting qualitative dynamics from experimental data , 1986 .

[22]  R Pool,et al.  Is it chaos, or is it just noise? , 1989, Science.

[23]  Farmer,et al.  Predicting chaotic time series. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[24]  J. Theiler Some Comments on the Correlation Dimension of 1/fαNoise , 1991 .

[25]  K. Denman The variance spectrum of phytoplankton in a turbulent ocean , 1976 .

[26]  M. Rosenblatt Linear processes and bispectra , 1980 .

[27]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Detecting chaos with neural networks , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Joseph Ford,et al.  How random is a coin toss , 1983 .

[29]  David J. Wales,et al.  Calculating the rate of loss of information from chaotic time series by forecasting , 1991, Nature.