Accounting for Respondent Uncertainty to Improve Willingness‐to‐Pay Estimates

"In this paper, we develop an econometric model of willingness to pay (WTP) that integrates data on respondent uncertainty regarding their own WTP. The integration is utility consistent, there is no recoding of variables, and no need to calibrate the contingent responses to actual payment data, so the approach can "stand alone." In an application to a valuation study related to whooping crane restoration, we find that this model generates a statistically lower expected WTP than the standard contingent valuation (CV) model. Moreover, the WTP function estimated with this model is not statistically different from that estimated using actual payment data suggesting that, when properly analyzed using data on respondent uncertainty, CV decisions can simulate actual payment decisions. This method allows for more reliable estimates of WTP that incorporate respondent uncertainty without the need for collecting comparable actual payment data." Copyright (c) 2010 Canadian Agricultural Economics Society.

[1]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: the case of the Mexican spotted owl , 1998 .

[2]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Where to from Here , 2003 .

[3]  Magnus Johannesson,et al.  Experimental Results on Expressed Certainty and Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation , 1998 .

[4]  W. Shaw,et al.  A theoretically-consistent empirical model of non-expected utility: An application to nuclear-waste transport , 2006 .

[5]  Robert P. Berrens,et al.  Further Investigation of Voluntary Contribution Contingent Valuation: Fair Share, Time of Contribution, and Respondent Uncertainty , 2002 .

[6]  Christian A. Vossler,et al.  Externally validating contingent valuation: an open-space survey and referendum in Corvallis, Oregon , 2003 .

[7]  J. Kushman.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses: Comment , 1987 .

[8]  T. Cameron,et al.  Updating Subjective Risks in the Presence of Conflicting Information: An Application to Climate Change , 2002 .

[9]  G. Harrison.  Hypothetical Bias Over Uncertain Outcomes , 2005 .

[10]  Kenneth E. McConnell,et al.  Does Altruism Undermine Existence Value , 1997 .

[11]  Robert J. Johnston,et al.  Is hypothetical bias universal? Validating contingent valuation responses using a binding public referendum , 2006 .

[12]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods , 1997 .

[13]  Some Further Implications of Incorporating the Warm Glow of Giving into Welfare Measures: A Comment on the Use of Donation Mechanisms by Champet al. , 1999 .

[14]  M. Marchesi,et al.  Journal of economic behavior and organization: special issue on heterogeneous interacting agents in financial markets , 2002 .

[15]  Christopher J. Miller,et al.  Valuing Water Quality Monitoring: A Contingent Valuation Experiment Involving Hypothetical and Real Payments , 1998, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[16]  K. McConnell,et al.  Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources , 2002 .

[17]  G. V. van Kooten,et al.  Comparing Fuzzy and Probabilistic Approaches to Preference Uncertainty in Non-Market Valuation , 2009 .

[18]  小林 信治,et al.  自然資源および環境資源への制御理論の適用-解説-上-(Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,4,1977) , 1981 .

[19]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: Comparisons to a Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Approach , 1998 .

[20]  Timothy C. Haab,et al.  Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation , 2002 .

[21]  Clive Jones,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Real Economic Commitments: Evidence from Electric Utility Green Pricing Programmes , 1999 .

[22]  Nicholas E. Flores.  Non-paternalistic altruism and welfare economics , 2002 .

[23]  Emina Krcmar,et al.  Preference Uncertainty in Non‐Market Valuation: A Fuzzy Approach , 2001 .

[24]  Anna Alberini,et al.  Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty , 2003 .

[25]  J. Loomis.  Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation , 2005 .

[26]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Multiple-Bounded Uncertainty Choice Data as Probabilistic Intentions , 2003, Land Economics.

[27]  T. Stevens,et al.  A comparison of alternative certainty calibration techniques in contingent valuation , 2006 .

[28]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[29]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same? , 2002 .

[30]  R. Ready,et al.  How Do Respondents with Uncertain Willingness to Pay Answer Contingent Valuation Questions? , 2001, Land Economics.

[31]  J. Louviere,et al.  Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation , 1998 .

[32]  G. Cornelis van Kooten,et al.  Treating respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation: A comparison of empirical treatments , 2007 .

[33]  Leif Mattsson,et al.  Discrete choice under preference uncertainty: an improved structural model for contingent valuation. , 1995 .

[34]  Christian A. Vossler,et al.  A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendum , 2003 .

[35]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Incentive and informational properties of preference questions , 2007 .

[36]  B. Noon,et al.  The spotted owl , 1990 .

[37]  Catherine L. Kling,et al.  Estimating the Precision of Welfare Measures , 1991 .

[38]  Christian A. Vossler,et al.  Payment Certainty in Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Responses: Results from a Field Validity Test , 2003 .

[39]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias , 2001 .

[40]  Hua Wang,et al.  Treatment of “Don't-Know” Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys: A Random Valuation Model , 1997 .

[41]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses , 1984 .

[42]  Magnus Johannesson,et al.  Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2008 .

[43]  B. Jorgensen,et al.  The role of uncertainty in the relationship between fairness evaluations and willingness to pay , 2006 .

[44]  Lili Sun,et al.  WORKING PAPER , 2007 .

[45]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  A Comparison of Approaches to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias , 2009, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[46]  Alan Randall,et al.  A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation , 1987 .

[47]  Glenn C. Blomquist,et al.  Contingent Valuation When Respondents Are Ambivalent , 1995 .

[48]  J. Cooper.  A Comparison of Approaches to Calculating Confidence Intervals for Benefit Measures from Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1994 .