The effect of vortex formation on left ventricular filling and mitral valve efficiency.

A new mechanism for quantifying the filling energetics in the left ventricle (LV) and past mechanical heart valves (MHV) is identified and presented. This mechanism is attributed to vortex formation dynamics past MHV leaflets. Recent studies support the conjecture that the natural healthy left ventricle (LV) performs in an optimum, energy-preserving manner by redirecting the flow with high efficiency. Yet to date, no quantitative proof has been presented. The present work provides quantitative results and validation of a theory based on the dynamics of vortex ring formation, which is governed by a critical formation number (FN) that corresponds to the dimensionless time at which the vortex ring has reached its maximum circulation content, in support of this hypothesis. Herein, several parameters (vortex ring circulation, vortex ring energy, critical FN, hydrodynamic efficiencies, vortex ring propagation speed) have been quantified and presented as a means of bridging the physics of vortex formation in the LV. In fact, the diastolic hydrodynamic efficiencies were found to be 60, 41, and 29%, respectively, for the porcine, anti-anatomical, and anatomical valve configurations. This assessment provides quantitative proof of vortex formation, which is dependent of valve design and orientation, being an important flow characteristic and associated to LV energetics. Time resolved digital particle image velocimetry with kilohertz sampling rate was used to study the ejection of fluid into the LV and resolve the spatiotemporal evolution of the flow. The clinical significance of this study is quantifying vortex formation and the critical FN that can potentially serve as a parameter to quantify the LV filling process and the performance of heart valves.

[1]  Y. T. Chew,et al.  Particle image velocimetry in the investigation of flow past artificial heart valves , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  M. Perthel,et al.  High-intensity transient signals (HITS) as a parameter for optimum orientation of mechanical aortic valves. , 2000, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[3]  G. Haller An objective definition of a vortex , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  Ari Glezer,et al.  An experimental study of a turbulent vortex ring , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  John O. Dabiri,et al.  Vortex ring pinchoff in the presence of simultaneously initiated uniform background co-flow , 2003 .

[6]  R. Pélissier,et al.  Ventricular flow Dynamic past Bileaflet Prosthetic Heart Valves , 1995, The International journal of artificial organs.

[7]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  Turbulent shear stress measurements in the vicinity of aortic heart valve prostheses. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  H Reul,et al.  Fluid mechanics of the natural mitral valve. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  In vitro pulsatile flow velocity and shear stress measurements in the vicinity of mechanical mitral heart valve prostheses. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J. Seward,et al.  The noninvasive assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. , 1997, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[11]  H Nygaard,et al.  Orientation of tilting disc and bileaflet aortic valve substitutes for optimal hemodynamics. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  J Fisher,et al.  Hydrodynamic function of ten prosthetic heart valves in the aortic position. , 1988, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[13]  G Rosenberg,et al.  Relative blood damage in the three phases of a prosthetic heart valve flow cycle. , 1993, ASAIO journal.

[14]  H. Reul,et al.  In vitro stress measurements in the vicinity of six mechanical aortic valves using hot-film anemometry in steady flow. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  N. Didden On the formation of vortex rings: Rolling-up and production of circulation , 1979 .

[16]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  A comparison of the hinge and near-hinge flow fields of the St Jude medical hemodynamic plus and regent bileaflet mechanical heart valves. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  H. Reul,et al.  Pressure drop and velocity fields at four mechanical heart valve prostheses: Björk-Shiley Standard, Björk-Shiley Concave-Convex, Hall-Kaster and St. Jude Medical. , 1983, Life support systems : the journal of the European Society for Artificial Organs.

[18]  G. Pedrizzetti,et al.  Vortex Dynamics , 2011 .

[19]  Ajit P. Yoganathan,et al.  Experimental Investigation of the Steady Flow Downstream of the St. Jude Bileaflet Heart Valve: A Comparison Between Laser Doppler Velocimetry and Particle Image Velocimetry Techniques , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  K B Chandran,et al.  Velocity and turbulence measurements past mitral valve prostheses in a model left ventricle. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  B Khalighi,et al.  Laser anemometry measurements of pulsatile flow past aortic valve prostheses. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  J. Westerweel Digital particle image velocimetry: theory and application , 1993 .

[23]  R. Rieu,et al.  A new dual activation simulator of the left heart that reproduces physiological and pathological conditions , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[24]  C. Willert,et al.  Digital particle image velocimetry , 1991 .

[25]  Steven Deutsch,et al.  Three-component laser doppler velocimetry measurements in the regurgitant flow region of a björk-shiley monostrut mitral valve , 1997, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  S. Chu,et al.  Pulsatile flow past bileaflet aortic valve prostheses , 1996 .

[27]  M. Gharib,et al.  A universal time scale for vortex ring formation , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[28]  Pavlos Vlachos,et al.  Super Spatio-Temporal Resolution, Digital PIV System for Multi-Phase Flows With Phase Differentiation and Simultaneous Shape and Size Quantification , 2002 .

[29]  Joseph D. Bronzino,et al.  The Biomedical Engineering Handbook , 1995 .

[30]  P. Vandervoort,et al.  Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses. Localized high velocities and gradients in central and side orifices with implications for Doppler-catheter gradient relation in aortic and mitral position. , 1995, Circulation.

[31]  K B Chandran,et al.  Effect of prosthetic mitral valve geometry and orientation on flow dynamics in a model human left ventricle. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  R T Schoephoerster,et al.  Effects of local geometry and fluid dynamics on regional platelet deposition on artificial surfaces. , 1993, Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology.

[33]  Ajit P Yoganathan,et al.  In vitro dynamic strain behavior of the mitral valve posterior leaflet. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[34]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  In vitro assessment of prosthetic valve function in mitral valve replacement with chordal preservation techniques. , 1996, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[35]  Morteza Gharib,et al.  Energy and velocity of a forming vortex ring , 2000 .

[36]  D. I. Pullin,et al.  Vortex ring formation at tube and orifice openings , 1979 .

[37]  Pavlos Vlachos,et al.  Comparative Study of Established DPIV Algorithms for Planar Velocity Measurements , 2002 .

[38]  H Reul,et al.  Velocity and Shear Stress Distribution Downstream of Mechanical Heart Valves in Pulsatile Flow , 1989, The International journal of artificial organs.

[39]  M. Gharib,et al.  On errors of digital particle image velocimetry , 1997 .

[40]  B Khalighi,et al.  Experimental study of physiological pulsatile flow past valve prostheses in a model of human aorta--I. Caged ball valves. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[41]  G. Rau,et al.  Comparative in vitro evaluation of porcine and pericardial bioprostheses. , 1986, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie.

[42]  T. Dohi,et al.  Nonsymmetric leaflet motion of St. Jude Medical mitral valves simulated with a computer-controlled hydraulic mock circulator. , 2008, Artificial organs.

[43]  L. Talbot,et al.  A fluid-mechanical study of the closure of heart valves , 1979, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[44]  M. Yacoub,et al.  Asymmetric redirection of flow through the heart , 2000, Nature.

[45]  M. Gharib,et al.  Vortex shedding as a mechanism for free emboli formation in mechanical heart valves. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[46]  Gross Jm,et al.  Vortex shedding in bileaflet heart valve prostheses. , 1988 .

[47]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  In vitro flow dynamics of four prosthetic aortic valves: a comparative analysis. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[48]  L. Prandtl,et al.  Essentials of fluid dynamics , 1952 .

[49]  L. Edmunds,et al.  Evolution of prosthetic heart valves. , 2001, American heart journal.

[50]  Jinhee Jeong,et al.  On the identification of a vortex , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[51]  Olga Pierrakos,et al.  Time-resolved DPIV analysis of vortex dynamics in a left ventricular model through bileaflet mechanical and porcine heart valve prostheses. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[52]  Moshe Rosenfeld,et al.  Circulation and formation number of laminar vortex rings , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.