Assessing the accuracy of vendor-supplied accessibility documentation

Purpose – In an effort to ensure vendor compliance with Section 508, some libraries have begun requesting Voluntary Product Accessibility Templates (VPATs) or other documentation of accessibility compliance. The purpose of this paper is to assess the accuracy of vendor-supplied compliance documentation, and to identify common accessibility issues highlighted by the VPATs. A detailed discussion of vendor responses to each Section 508 checkpoint is provided in the Appendix. Design/methodology/approach – Researchers compared 17 VPATs with the results of an automated accessibility scan to identify inconsistencies and common problems. Findings – Vendors reported being fully compliant with 64 percent of the applicable VPAT items, and partially compliant with a further 24 percent. However, in 16 of 17 cases, there were discrepancies between the information on the VPAT and the results of the scan. Of the total 189 VPAT checkpoints the author scanned, 19.6 percent had errors (meaning the information on the VPAT wa...

[1]  Norda Majekodunmi,et al.  Online databases and the research experience for university students with print disabilities , 2011, Libr. Hi Tech.

[2]  Mireia Ribera Turró Are PDF Documents Accessible , 2008 .

[3]  David Comeaux,et al.  Accessibility of academic library web sites in North America - current status and trends (2002-2012) , 2013, Libr. Hi Tech.

[4]  Suzanne L. Byerley,et al.  Accessibility of web-based library databases: the vendors' perspectives in 2007 , 2007, Libr. Hi Tech.

[5]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 , 2008 .

[6]  Mohammed Azmi Al-Betar,et al.  The design of RIA accessibility evaluation tool , 2013, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[7]  Nina McHale,et al.  An Introduction to Web Accessibility, Web Standards, and Web Standards Makers , 2011 .

[8]  Joan C. Durrance,et al.  Overcoming the information gap: Measuring the accessibility of library databases to adaptive technology users , 2010, Libr. Hi Tech.

[9]  Yeliz Yesilada,et al.  Barriers common to mobile and disabled web users , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[10]  Miguel Ángel Pérez Toledano,et al.  Providing RIA user interfaces with accessibility properties , 2011, J. Symb. Comput..

[11]  Mireia Ribera,et al.  Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0: A further step towards accessible digital information , 2009, Program.

[12]  Dag Svanæs,et al.  Validating WCAG versions 1.0 and 2.0 through usability testing with disabled users , 2012, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[13]  Alex Q. Chen,et al.  Widget Identification: A High-Level Approach to Accessibility , 2012, World Wide Web.