Iterative voting and acyclic games
暂无分享,去创建一个
Nicholas R. Jennings | Maria Polukarov | Jeffrey S. Rosenschein | Reshef Meir | J. Rosenschein | N. Jennings | R. Meir | M. Polukarov
[1] Ulrich Endriss,et al. Iterated Majority Voting , 2009, ADT.
[2] N. Kukushkin. Potential games: a purely ordinal approach , 1999 .
[3] Igal Milchtaich. Schedulers, Potentials and Weak Potentials in Weakly Acyclic Games , 2013 .
[4] Ben Lockwood,et al. When are plurality rule voting games dominance-solvable? , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..
[5] H. Young,et al. The Evolution of Conventions , 1993 .
[6] Toby Walsh,et al. Restricted Manipulation in Iterative Voting: Condorcet Efficiency and Borda Score , 2013, ADT.
[7] Nikolai S. Kukushkin,et al. Acyclicity of improvements in finite game forms , 2011, Int. J. Game Theory.
[8] Jason R. Marden,et al. Regret based dynamics: convergence in weakly acyclic games , 2007, AAMAS '07.
[9] Jerry S. Kelly,et al. STRATEGY-PROOFNESS AND SOCIAL CHOICE FUNCTIONS WITHOUT SINGLEVALUEDNESS , 1977 .
[10] I. Milchtaich,et al. Congestion Games with Player-Specific Payoff Functions , 1996 .
[11] William S. Zwicker,et al. Introduction to the Theory of Voting , 2016, Handbook of Computational Social Choice.
[12] Simina Brânzei,et al. How Bad Is Selfish Voting? , 2013, AAAI.
[13] Omer Lev,et al. A local-dominance theory of voting equilibria , 2014, EC.
[14] Mark C. Wilson,et al. Best Reply Dynamics for Scoring Rules , 2012, ECAI.
[15] Reshef Meir,et al. Random Tie-breaking with Stochastic Dominance , 2016, ArXiv.
[16] Ulle Endriss,et al. Sincerity and manipulation under approval voting , 2012, Theory and Decision.
[17] Bhaskar Dutta,et al. EFFECTIVITY FUNCTIONS AND ACCEPTABLE GAME FORMS , 1984 .
[18] Krzysztof R. Apt,et al. A classification of weakly acyclic games , 2012, SAGT.
[19] Omer Lev,et al. Convergence and Quality of Iterative Voting under Non-Scoring Rules: (Extended Abstract) , 2016, AAMAS.
[20] L. Shapley,et al. Potential Games , 1994 .
[21] L. Shapley,et al. REGULAR ARTICLEPotential Games , 1996 .
[22] Vladimir Gurvich,et al. Acyclic, or totally tight, two-person game forms: Characterization and main properties , 2010, Discret. Math..
[23] Edith Elkind,et al. Gibbard-Satterthwaite Games , 2015, IJCAI.
[24] M. Satterthwaite. Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions , 1975 .
[25] D. Saari. Susceptibility to manipulation , 1990 .
[26] Neelam Gohar,et al. Manipulative voting dynamics , 2012 .
[27] Noam Nisan,et al. A Quantitative Version of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem for Three Alternatives , 2011, SIAM J. Comput..
[28] Rohit Parikh,et al. Knowledge-Theoretic Properties of Strategic Voting , 2004, JELIA.
[29] Lirong Xia,et al. Sequential voting rules and multiple elections paradoxes , 2007, TARK '07.
[30] Omer Lev,et al. Convergence of Iterative Scoring Rules , 2016, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[31] Jonathan K. Hodge,et al. The potential of iterative voting to solve the separability problem in referendum elections , 2013, Theory and Decision.
[32] Vincent Conitzer,et al. Dominating Manipulations in Voting with Partial Information , 2011, AAAI.
[33] Vladimir Gurvich,et al. On acyclicity of games with cycles , 2009, Discret. Appl. Math..
[34] Richard W. Hamming,et al. Error detecting and error correcting codes , 1950 .
[35] A. Gibbard. Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result , 1973 .
[36] M. Messner,et al. Robust Political Equilibria Under Plurality and Runoff Rule , 2005 .
[37] Tilman Börgers,et al. Pure Strategy Dominance , 1993 .
[38] Nikolai S. Kukushkin,et al. Perfect Information and Potential Games , 2002, Games Econ. Behav..
[39] Moshe Tennenholtz,et al. On Coalitions and Stable Winners in Plurality , 2012, WINE.
[40] Nicholas R. Jennings,et al. On the Convergence of Iterative Voting: How Restrictive Should Restricted Dynamics Be? , 2015, AAAI.
[41] Murat R. Sertel,et al. Strong equilibrium outcomes of voting games ¶are the generalized Condorcet winners , 2004, Soc. Choice Welf..
[42] Svetlana Obraztsova,et al. Strategic Voting with Incomplete Information , 2016, IJCAI.
[43] Edith Elkind,et al. Equilibria of plurality voting with abstentions , 2010, EC '10.
[44] Michael H. Bowling,et al. Convergence and No-Regret in Multiagent Learning , 2004, NIPS.
[45] A. Roth. The college admissions problem is not equivalent to the marriage problem , 1985 .
[46] Reshef Meir,et al. Strong and Weak Acyclicity in Iterative Voting , 2016, SAGT.
[47] Thomas A. Rietz,et al. An experimental study of voting rules and polls in three-candidate elections , 1996 .
[48] Alex Fabrikant,et al. On the Structure of Weakly Acyclic Games , 2010, Theory of Computing Systems.
[49] P. Gärdenfors. Manipulation of social choice functions , 1976 .
[50] Ulrich Endriss,et al. Voter response to iterated poll information , 2012, AAMAS.
[51] Reshef Meir,et al. Plurality Voting Under Uncertainty , 2014, AAAI.
[52] Omer Lev,et al. Analysis of Equilibria in Iterative Voting Schemes , 2015, AAAI.
[53] Ulrich Endriss,et al. Automated Search for Impossibility Theorems in Social Choice Theory: Ranking Sets of Objects , 2014, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[54] Omer Lev,et al. Convergence of iterative voting , 2012, AAMAS.
[55] Svetlana Obraztsova,et al. Plurality Voting with Truth-Biased Agents , 2013, SAGT.
[56] Nicholas R. Jennings,et al. Convergence to Equilibria in Plurality Voting , 2010, AAAI.
[57] Vladimir Gurvich,et al. Nash-solvable bidirected cyclic two-person game forms , 2008 .