Reinforcing efficiency of nanoparticles: A simple comparison for polymer nanocomposites

The mechanical reinforcing efficiencies of two types of nanoparticles, nanotube and nanoplatelet, are compared from a micro-mechanics perspective. Additionally, the interphase zone created by altered dynamics of host polymer molecules in the vicinity of the nanoparticles is addressed. The results indicate that nanotubes generally have superior mechanical reinforcement potential beyond that of nanoplatelets for aligned orientations, while the high in-plane isotropic modulus of nanoplatelets allows better reinforcing in random orientations. However, at the same volume fraction, under the assumption of identical degree of dispersion and extent of influence on the surrounding polymer molecules, the nanotubes generate a significantly larger amount of interphase than the nanoplatelets. The interphase effects can then overwhelm the basic nanoparticle influence and lead to higher stiffnesses for all configurations of nanotube composites. These simple yet insightful comparisons may provide guidance in the design of nanocomposites.

[1]  G. P. Tandon,et al.  The effect of aspect ratio of inclusions on the elastic properties of unidirectionally aligned composites , 1984 .

[2]  D. Long,et al.  Heterogeneous dynamics at the glass transition in van der Waals liquids, in the bulk and in thin films , 2001 .

[3]  Christopher J. Ellison,et al.  The distribution of glass-transition temperatures in nanoscopically confined glass formers , 2003, Nature materials.

[4]  Charles L. Tucker,et al.  Stiffness Predictions for Unidirectional Short-Fiber Composites: Review and Evaluation , 1999 .

[5]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Continuum Mechanics Modeling and Simulation of Carbon Nanotubes , 2005 .

[6]  M. Leamy.  Bulk dynamic response modeling of carbon nanotubes using an intrinsic finite element formulation incorporating interatomic potentials , 2007 .

[7]  Frank T. Fisher,et al.  Reinforcement mechanisms in MWCNT-filled polycarbonate , 2006 .

[8]  R. Batra,et al.  Buckling of multiwalled carbon nanotubes under axial compression , 2006 .

[9]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Finite crystal elasticity of carbon nanotubes based on the exponential Cauchy-Born rule , 2004 .

[10]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Average stress in matrix and average elastic energy of materials with misfitting inclusions , 1973 .

[11]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Nanotube Networks in Polymer Nanocomposites: Rheology and Electrical Conductivity , 2004 .

[12]  Kyeongjae Cho,et al.  Nanomechanics of carbon nanotubes and composites , 2003 .

[13]  F W Starr,et al.  Effects of a nanoscopic filler on the structure and dynamics of a simulated polymer melt and the relationship to ultrathin films. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  L. Brinson,et al.  Functionalized SWNT/polymer nanocomposites for dramatic property improvement , 2005 .

[15]  Kyeongjae Cho,et al.  Thermal Expansion and Diffusion Coefficients of Carbon Nanotube-Polymer Composites , 2002, cond-mat/0203349.

[16]  G. Odegard,et al.  Modeling and Testing of the Viscoelastic Properties of a Graphite Nanoplatelet/Epoxy Composite , 2006 .

[17]  Richard M. Christensen,et al.  A critical evaluation for a class of micro-mechanics models , 1990 .

[18]  H. Shen,et al.  Graphitic nanofillers in PMMA nanocomposites—An investigation of particle size and dispersion and their influence on nanocomposite properties , 2007 .

[19]  L. Schadler,et al.  Quantitative equivalence between polymer nanocomposites and thin polymer films , 2005, Nature materials.

[20]  Y. Benveniste,et al.  A new approach to the application of Mori-Tanaka's theory in composite materials , 1987 .

[21]  Jacqueline J. Li,et al.  Homogenization of a fibre/sphere with an inhomogeneous interphase for the effective elastic moduli of composites , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[22]  L. Brinson,et al.  A Hybrid Numerical-Analytical Method for Modeling the Viscoelastic Properties of Polymer Nanocomposites , 2006 .

[23]  Isaac M. Daniel,et al.  Characterization and modeling of mechanical behavior of polymer/clay nanocomposites , 2003 .

[24]  M. Moniruzzaman,et al.  Polymer Nanocomposites Containing Carbon Nanotubes , 2006 .

[25]  D. Bedrov,et al.  A molecular dynamics simulation study of the viscoelastic properties of polymer nanocomposites , 2002 .

[26]  Peter F. Green,et al.  Elastic modulus of single‐walled carbon nanotube/poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposites , 2004 .

[27]  J. Jung,et al.  Thickness and composition dependence of the glass transition temperature in thin random copolymer films , 2004 .

[28]  P. Ajayan,et al.  Nanocomposite Science And Technology , 2003 .

[29]  Tsu-Wei Chou,et al.  Nanocomposites in context , 2005 .

[30]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Finite element methods for the non‐linear mechanics of crystalline sheets and nanotubes , 2004 .