Optional contributions have positive effects for volunteering public goods games

Abstract Public goods (PG) games with the volunteering mechanism are referred to as volunteering public goods (VPG) games, in which loners are introduced to the PG games, and a loner obtains a constant payoff but not participating the game. Considering that small contributions may have positive effects to encourage more players with bounded rationality to contribute, this paper introduces optional contributions (high value or low value) to these typical VPG games—a cooperator can contribute a high or low payoff to the public pools. With the low contribution, the logit dynamics show that cooperation can be promoted in a well mixed population comparing to the typical VPG games, furthermore, as the multiplication factor is greater than a threshold, the average payoff of the population is also enhanced. In spatial VPG games, we introduce a new adjusting mechanism that is an approximation to best response. Some results in agreement with the prediction of the logit dynamics are found. These simulation results reveal that for VPG games the option of low contributions may be a better method to stimulate the growth of cooperation frequency and the average payoff of the population.

[1]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[2]  Chengbin Peng,et al.  Cooperation and charity in spatial public goods game under different strategy update rules , 2010 .

[3]  Víctor M Eguíluz,et al.  Coevolution of dynamical states and interactions in dynamic networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[5]  Christoph Hauert,et al.  Replicator dynamics of reward & reputation in public goods games. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  L. Blume The Statistical Mechanics of Strategic Interaction , 1993 .

[7]  David G. Rand,et al.  Winners don’t punish , 2008, Nature.

[8]  Zhaojin Xu,et al.  Bounded rationality in volunteering public goods games. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  M. Milinski,et al.  Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’ , 2002, Nature.

[10]  K. Kaski,et al.  Spatial snowdrift game with myopic agents , 2005 .

[11]  A. Colman Game Theory and its Applications: In the Social and Biological Sciences , 1995 .

[12]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game , 2004, Nature.

[13]  György Szabó,et al.  Phase transitions and volunteering in spatial public goods games. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[14]  Ádám Kun,et al.  Evolution of cooperation on dynamical graphs , 2009, Biosyst..

[15]  E. Fehr,et al.  Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments , 1999, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  Nick Netzer,et al.  The logit-response dynamics , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[17]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games , 2008, Nature.

[18]  Joe Yuichiro Wakano,et al.  Ecological public goods games: cooperation and bifurcation. , 2008, Theoretical population biology.

[19]  S. Számadó,et al.  The effect of dispersal and neighbourhood in games of cooperation. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  Christoph Hauert,et al.  Public goods games with reward in finite populations , 2011, Journal of mathematical biology.

[21]  P. Taylor,et al.  Evolutionarily Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics , 1978 .

[22]  Marco Tomassini,et al.  Evolutionary games on networks and payoff invariance under replicator dynamics , 2009, Biosyst..

[23]  C. Hauert,et al.  Volunteering as Red Queen Mechanism for Cooperation in Public Goods Games , 2002, Science.

[24]  Michael Kirley Evolutionary minority games with small-world interactions , 2005 .

[25]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  The replicator equation on graphs. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  T. Yamagishi The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good , 1986 .

[27]  M. Milinski,et al.  Volunteering leads to rock–paper–scissors dynamics in a public goods game , 2003, Nature.

[28]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  The Theory of Learning in Games , 1998 .

[29]  L. Samuelson,et al.  Evolutionary stability in repeated games played by finite automata , 1992 .

[30]  Heinz Mühlenbein,et al.  Evolution of Cooperation in a Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma , 2002, Adv. Complex Syst..

[31]  David G. Rand,et al.  Positive Interactions Promote Public Cooperation , 2009, Science.

[32]  Ángel Sánchez,et al.  Promotion of cooperation on networks? The myopic best response case , 2009, ArXiv.

[33]  James H Fowler,et al.  Altruistic Punishment and the Origin of Cooperation , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Tadeusz Płatkowski,et al.  A mechanism of dynamical interactions for two-person social dilemmas. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.