AN INVESTIGATION INTO HOW PROPERTY DEVELOPERS USE THEIR SOCIAL NETWORKS TO DRIVE DEVELOPMENT

While there is a substantial literature available regarding the individual specialist constituents of the development process, such as planning, finance, construction management, and economic perspectives, there is very little that discusses the whole process or the perspective of the property developer, their behaviour, methods and motivations. The world of property development is somewhat hidden and it needs researching to consolidate our understanding of the creation of the built environment. The property development world is renowned for its individual’s personalities and it is how these individuals work that is of interest. Drawing on Harris and Cundell’s observations that individual judgement is often made based on experience and instinct or “gut feel”, this investigation aims to explore how developers approach complex decisions with incomplete knowledge. A series of semi-structured, exploratory interviews were conducted with small, independent commercial property developers. Preliminary findings suggested that there are a number of elements whose influence plays a significant role in the development process including social networks and the resultant social capital, which appear to bear a significant impact on opportunity identification. This paper considers the role and importance (as understood by the actors themselves) of their contacts (i.e. social networks) in the commercial development process. Interview data was analysed from an interpretivist stance and compared to relevant theory. Findings suggest that developers have a conscious awareness of the influence and impact that their network relationships have on development.

[1]  Rob Harris,et al.  Changing the property mindset by making research relevant , 1995 .

[2]  J. Knote Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community , 2004 .

[3]  P. Healey,et al.  Structure and Agency in Land and Property Development Processes: Some Ideas for Research , 1990 .

[4]  S. Guy,et al.  Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research , 2000 .

[5]  Tony Gore,et al.  Models of the Land-Development Process: A Critical Review , 1991 .

[6]  Mark Daley,et al.  Property Development: Appraisal and Finance , 1996 .

[7]  Patsy Healey,et al.  Models of the development process: A review , 1991 .

[8]  P. Bourdieu Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[9]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Barbara Czarniawska Narratives in Social Science Research , 2004 .

[11]  Edward Toomer,et al.  Qualitative Methods in Management Research , 1989 .

[12]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[14]  Evolution in the Supply of Commercial Real Estate: The Emergence of a New Relationship Between Suppliers and Occupiers of Real Estate , 2008 .

[15]  N. Lin Buidling a Network Theory of Social Capital , 1999, Connections.

[16]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[17]  G. Borrini-Feyerabend Collaborative Management of Protected Areas: Tailoring the Approach to the Context , 1996 .

[18]  M. Woolcock,et al.  Social capital: implications for development theory, research, and policy , 2000 .

[19]  David Cadman,et al.  Risk, Uncertainty and Decision-Making in Property Development , 1984 .

[20]  Patti Anklam,et al.  Knowledge Management: The Collaboration Thread. , 2005 .

[21]  R. Putnam Democracies in flux : the evolution of social capital in contemporary society , 2003 .

[22]  Albert O. Hirschman,et al.  Rival Interpretations of Market Society: Civilizing, Destructive, or Feeble? , 1982 .

[23]  Ezekiel Chinyio,et al.  Understanding the construction client , 2006 .

[24]  A. Bryman Social Research Methods , 2001 .