The relative effects of collagen fiber orientation, porosity, density, and mineralization on bone strength.

This investigation determined the relative importance of collagen fiber orientation, porosity, density, and mineralization in determining the tensile strength of bovine cortical bone. Thirty-nine specimens were tested for failure stress and the values of eight histologic and compositional parameters: collagen fiber orientation, wet and dry apparent density, percent mineralization of the bone matrix, and several components of porosity (Haversian canals, Volkmann's canals, and plexiform vascular spaces). Linear regression analysis showed that collagen fiber orientation was consistently the single best predictor of strength. Mineralization of the bone matrix was generally a poor predictor of strength. Density and porosity ranked between these variables in importance. Multiple regression equations containing all significantly correlated variables achieved correlation coefficients of 0.607 for plexiform bone and 0.881 for osteonal bone. Also, separate analysis of plexiform and osteonal specimens showed that the latter group was weaker even though it was less porous, apparently because it had collagen fibers which were less longitudinally oriented. This study suggests it is feasible to develop better empirical formulae for the prediction of cortical bone strength than are currently available if a variety of variables is introduced. Additional data are needed to confirm these results.

[1]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Relations among mechanical properties, collagen fibers, and calcification in adult human cortical bone. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  A Ascenzi,et al.  Distribution of osteonic and interstitial components in the human femoral shaft with reference to structure, calcification and mechanical properties. , 1983, Acta anatomica.

[3]  A. Ascenzi,et al.  THE ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH OF SINGLE OSTEONS. , 1964, Acta anatomica.

[4]  D R Carter,et al.  Mechanical properties and composition of cortical bone. , 1978, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Differences and relationships between the physical properties and the microscopic structure of human femoral, tibial and fibular cortical bone , 1967 .

[6]  E. Korostoff,et al.  Haversian osteons: size, distribution, internal structure, and orientation. , 1974, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  O. Appenzeller ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC STUDY OF THE INNERVATION OF THE AURICULAR ARTERY IN THE RAT. , 1964, Journal of anatomy.

[8]  W C Hayes,et al.  Fatigue life of compact bone--II. Effects of microstructure and density. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  P. Frasca,et al.  Mineral and Collagen Fiber Orientation in Human Secondary Osteons , 1978, Journal of dental research.

[10]  A. Ascenzi,et al.  The compressive properties of single osteons , 1968, The Anatomical record.

[11]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Relations of the compressive properties of human cortical bone to histological structure and calcification. , 1974, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  A. Ascenzi,et al.  The tensile properties of single osteons , 1967, The Anatomical record.

[13]  W. Hayes,et al.  Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. , 1976, Science.

[14]  P. Frasca,et al.  Collagen fiber orientations in human secondary osteons. , 1977, Acta anatomica.

[15]  J. Currey,et al.  Differences in the tensile strength of bone of different histological types. , 1959, Journal of anatomy.

[16]  A. Burstein,et al.  The Mechanical Properties of Cortical Bone , 1974 .

[17]  J. Katz,et al.  The Structure and Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of Bone , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  J. Hert,et al.  Comparison of the mechanical properties of both the primary and haversian bone tissue. , 1965, Acta anatomica.