Evaluation of HER2 Positivity Based on Clinicopathological Findings in HER2 Borderline Tumors in Iranian Patients with Breast Cancer

Background & Objective: Human epidermal growth receptor-2 (HER2) gene amplification is an important predictive and prognostic factor in breast cancer treatment. However, the expression of HER2 determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is considered as borderline in some cases, and confirmation of the HER2 status by either fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) or chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) is necessary for correct treatment decision-making. Considering the high cost of FISH and CISH, we aimed to investigate whether clinicopathological findings of the tumor could predict the HER2 status. Methods: A retrospective study was performed using the data from 584 patients with breast cancer with HER2-borderline disease, confirmed by IHC. Final HER2 status, pathologic tumor size and type, nodal involvement, Ki67 index, presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER, PR), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and stage were retrieved from the clinical records. Results: One hundred twenty-one (20.7%) patients were HER2-positive according to the FISH or CISH results. Logistic regression analysis showed that the pathologic size was positively associated with HER2 positivity with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01-1.04). In addition, the adjusted OR illustrated a statistically significant association between HER2 positivity and PR negativity (OR= 2.22, 95% CI: 1.29-3.83). Conclusion: In HER2 borderline breast cancer, HER2 positivity significantly increases with tumor size and PR negativity. Further studies are recommended that may find an applicable model to predict the actual status of HER2 in borderline cases.

[1]  D. Schmolze,et al.  Quantitative Impact of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) Practice Guideline Update on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Testing in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Analysis. , 2020, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.

[2]  R. Dikshit,et al.  HER2 borderline is a negative prognostic factor for primary malignant breast cancer , 2020, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[3]  D. Sirohi,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists 2018 Focused Update of Breast Cancer HER2 FISH Testing GuidelinesResults From a National Reference Laboratory. , 2019, American journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  R. Kumar,et al.  FISH and HER2/neu equivocal immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma. , 2019, Indian journal of cancer.

[5]  Yi Su,et al.  A nomogram to predict HER2 status in breast cancer patients with HER2-borderline disease as determined via immunohistochemistry. , 2017, Oncotarget.

[6]  G. Bethune,et al.  Well‐differentiated invasive breast cancers with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry: what is the yield of routine reflex in‐situ hybridization testing? , 2017, Histopathology.

[7]  Q. Jamal,et al.  Correlation of Hormone Receptor and HER2/neu Expression with Clinicopathologic Parameters in Primary Breast Tumors. , 2016, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[8]  D. Dabbs,et al.  Classical-type invasive lobular carcinoma with HER2 overexpression: clinical, histologic, and hormone receptor characteristics. , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  Sudeep Gupta,et al.  Assessment of HER-2/neu status in breast cancer using fluorescence in situ hybridization & immunohistochemistry: Experience of a tertiary cancer referral centre in India. , 2010, The Indian journal of medical research.

[10]  J. Cuzick,et al.  ER and HER2 expression are positively correlated in HER2 non-overexpressing breast cancer , 2009, Breast Cancer Research.

[11]  H. Nisenbaum,et al.  HER-2/neu Overexpression as a Predictor for the Transition from In situ to Invasive Breast Cancer , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[12]  Gaëtan MacGrogan,et al.  Prediction of HER2 gene status in Her2 2+ invasive breast cancer: a study of 108 cases comparing ASCO/CAP and FDA recommendations , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[13]  A. Plastiras,et al.  Comparison of Chromogenic In Situ Hybridisation with Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation and Immunohistochemistry for the Assessment of Her-2/neu Oncogene in Archival Material of Breast Carcinoma , 2008, Acta histochemica et cytochemica.

[14]  Mehrdad Nadji,et al.  HER2 in well differentiated breast cancer: is testing necessary? , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[15]  F. Penault-Llorca,et al.  Comparison of different commercial kits for HER2 testing in breast cancer: looking for the accurate cutoff for amplification , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.

[16]  P. Klein,et al.  Concordance between central and local laboratory HER2 testing from a community-based clinical study. , 2006, Clinical breast cancer.

[17]  Helena R. Chang,et al.  Histopathologic Characteristics Predicting HER‐2/neu Amplification in Breast Cancer , 2005, The breast journal.

[18]  T. Stephenson,et al.  HER2 amplification status in breast cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence in situ hybridisation using manual and automated quantitative image analysis scoring techniques , 2005, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[19]  P. Lal,et al.  Correlation of HER-2 status with estrogen and progesterone receptors and histologic features in 3,655 invasive breast carcinomas. , 2005, American journal of clinical pathology.

[20]  M. Gnant,et al.  Do we need HER‐2/neu testing for all patients with primary breast carcinoma? , 2003, Cancer.

[21]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Agreement between chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) and FISH in the determination of HER2 status in breast cancer , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  Gottfried Konecny,et al.  Quantitative association between HER-2/neu and steroid hormone receptors in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  J. Myles,et al.  HER2/neu amplification in breast cancer: stratification by tumor type and grade. , 2002, American journal of clinical pathology.

[24]  Rochelle L. Garcia,et al.  C‐ERBB‐2 oncogens protein in In situ and invasive lobular breast neoplasia , 1991 .

[25]  W Godolphin,et al.  Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. , 1989, Science.

[26]  M. Karimlou,et al.  Prevalence of HER-2-positive invasive breast cancer: a systematic review from Iran. , 2012, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[27]  A. Shamshiri,et al.  Breast cancer molecular subtypes and associations with clinicopathological characteristics in Iranian women, 2002- 2011. , 2012, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[28]  Y. Yarden,et al.  The basic biology of HER2. , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[29]  M. J. van de Vijver Assessment of the need and appropriate method for testing for the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2). , 2001, European journal of cancer.