The impact of old technologies on innovation: the case of the US biotechnology industry

This paper investigates the implications of a technology sourcing strategy maintaining a focus on the rediscovery of old technologies. Specifically, we study the different impact exerted by old technological solutions, distinguished on the basis of their organisational and industrial origins, on the innovation value. We develop a set of hypotheses about the impact exerted by four distinct types of old technological solutions (firm core technological heritage, firm lateral technological heritage, competitors’ technological heritage and others’ technological heritage) and test them on a sample of 1189 biotechnology patents registered at the US Patent and Trademark Office from 1979 to 2002. Results strongly support our hypotheses, revealing that: (1) using both firm core technological heritage and others’ technological heritage has an inverted U-shaped effect on innovation value; (2) employing firm lateral technological heritage is positively related to innovation value; (3) a negative relationship occurs between competitors’ core technological heritage and the value of subsequent innovations.

[1]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[2]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[3]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[4]  T. M. Amabile.  The social psychology of creativity , 1984 .

[5]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[6]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[7]  J. Fleming.  The constraints of corporate tradition , 1988 .

[8]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[9]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[10]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[11]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[12]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Organizational Information Processing, Competitive Responses, and Performance in the U.S. Domestic Airline Industry , 1991 .

[13]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[14]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[15]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[16]  L. Argote.  Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[17]  Alan Russell.  Biotechnology as a Technological Paradigm in the Global Knowledge Structure , 1999 .

[18]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Innovation Policy in a Global Economy: Global corporations and national systems of innovation: who dominates whom? , 1999 .

[19]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[20]  Michael Ornetzeder,et al.  Old Technology and Social Innovations. Inside the Austrian Success Story on Solar Water Heaters , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[21]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2001 .

[22]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[23]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[24]  R. Katila.  New Product Search Over Time: Past Ideas in Their Prime? , 2002 .

[25]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[26]  J. Hagedoorn.  Sharing intellectual property rights - an exploratory study of joint patenting amongst companies. , 2003 .

[27]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth About How Companies Innovate , 2003 .

[28]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Evolution of R&D Capabilities: The Role of Knowledge Networks Within a Firm , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist,et al.  Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin , 2006 .

[30]  Jasjit Singh.  Distributed R&D, Cross-Regional Knowledge Integration and Quality of Innovative Output , 2006 .

[31]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  OECD Biotechnology Statistics 2009 , 2006 .

[32]  Nicholas Vonortas,et al.  European Alliance and Knowledge Networks1 , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[33]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[34]  Padmashree Gehl Sampath,et al.  Breaking the Fence: Can Patent Rights Deter Biomedical Innovation in 'Technology Followers'? , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[35]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities , 2007 .

[36]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity , 2007 .

[37]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  A Search Theoretic Model of Productivity, Science and Innovation , 2007 .

[38]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  The nanotech vs . the biotech revolution : sources of productivity in incumbent firm research , 2007 .

[39]  Karen R. Polenske,et al.  The Economic Geography of Innovation: Measuring the geography of innovation: a literature review , 2007 .

[40]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation , 2008 .

[41]  Robert Jacobson,et al.  The recency of technological inputs and financial performance , 2008 .

[42]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Towards an Integrated Framework for Managing the Process of Innovation , 2009 .

[43]  D. Freddi.  The integration of old and new technological paradigms in low- and medium-tech sectors: The case of mechatronics , 2009 .

[44]  Daniel C. Snow,et al.  'Old' Technology Responses to 'New' Technology Threats: Demand Heterogeneity and Graceful Technology Retreats , 2009 .