Short-term clinical effects of tolvaptan, an oral vasopressin antagonist, in patients hospitalized for heart failure: the EVEREST Clinical Status Trials.

CONTEXT Heart failure causes more than 1 million US hospitalizations yearly, mostly related to congestion. Tolvaptan, an oral, nonpeptide, selective vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist, shows promise in this condition. OBJECTIVE To evaluate short-term effects of tolvaptan when added to standard therapy in patients hospitalized with heart failure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Two identical prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials at 359 sites in North America, South America, and Europe were conducted during the inpatient period of the Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study With Tolvaptan (EVEREST) between October 7, 2003, and February 3, 2006. A total of 2048 (trial A) and 2085 (trial B) patients hospitalized with heart failure and congestion were studied. INTERVENTION Patients were randomized to receive either tolvaptan (30 mg/d) or matching placebo, within 48 hours of admission. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary end point was a composite of changes in global clinical status based on a visual analog scale and body weight at day 7 or discharge if earlier. Secondary end points included dyspnea (day 1), global clinical status (day 7 or discharge), body weight (days 1 and 7 or discharge), and peripheral edema (day 7 or discharge). RESULTS Rank sum analysis of the composite primary end point showed greater improvement with tolvaptan vs placebo (trial A, mean [SD], 1.06 [0.43] vs 0.99 [0.44]; and trial B, 1.07 [0.42] vs 0.97 [0.43]; both trials P<.001). Mean (SD) body weight reduction was greater with tolvaptan on day 1 (trial A, 1.71 [1.80] vs 0.99 [1.83] kg; P<.001; and trial B, 1.82 [2.01] vs 0.95 [1.85] kg; P<.001) and day 7 or discharge (trial A, 3.35 [3.27] vs 2.73 [3.34] kg; P<.001; and trial B, 3.77 [3.59] vs 2.79 [3.46] kg; P<.001), whereas improvements in global clinical status were not different between groups. More patients receiving tolvaptan (684 [76.7%] and 678 [72.1%] for trial A and trial B, respectively) vs patients receiving placebo (646 [70.6%] and 597 [65.3%], respectively) reported improvement in dyspnea at day 1 (both trials P<.001). Edema at day 7 or discharge improved significantly with tolvaptan in trial B (P = .02) but did not reach significance in trial A (P = .07). Serious adverse event frequencies were similar between groups, without excess renal failure or hypotension. CONCLUSION In patients hospitalized with heart failure, oral tolvaptan in addition to standard therapy including diuretics improved many, though not all, heart failure signs and symptoms, without serious adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00071331

[1]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2008, Circulation.

[2]  K. Swedberg,et al.  Effects of oral tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure: the EVEREST Outcome Trial. , 2007, JAMA.

[3]  M. Guglin,et al.  Ultrafiltration versus intravenous diuretics for patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  David D. Shin,et al.  Review of current and investigational pharmacologic agents for acute heart failure syndromes. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  M. Gheorghiade,et al.  Use and impact of inotropes and vasodilator therapy in hospitalized patients with severe heart failure. , 2007, American heart journal.

[6]  J. Cleland,et al.  Practical applications of intravenous diuretic therapy in decompensated heart failure. , 2006, The American journal of medicine.

[7]  G. Filippatos,et al.  Congestion in acute heart failure syndromes: an essential target of evaluation and treatment. , 2006, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  T. Berl,et al.  Tolvaptan, a selective oral vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist, for hyponatremia. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Nancy M Albert,et al.  Systolic blood pressure at admission, clinical characteristics, and outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure. , 2006, JAMA.

[10]  P. Ponikowski,et al.  EuroHeart Failure Survey II (EHFS II): a survey on hospitalized acute heart failure patients: description of population. , 2006, European heart journal.

[11]  K. Aaronson,et al.  Risk of death associated with nesiritide in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure. , 2006, JAMA.

[12]  M. Nieminen,et al.  Evidence-based use of levosimendan in different clinical settings. , 2006, European heart journal.

[13]  N. Freemantle,et al.  Clinical trials update from the American Heart Association: REPAIR‐AMI, ASTAMI, JELIS, MEGA, REVIVE‐II, SURVIVE, and PROACTIVE , 2006, European journal of heart failure.

[14]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Nationwide survey on acute heart failure in cardiology ward services in Italy. , 2005, European heart journal.

[15]  T. Thom,et al.  American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee : Heart disease and stroke statistical-2006 update : A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke statistics subcommittee , 2006 .

[16]  Luigi Tavazzi,et al.  Acute Heart Failure Syndromes: Current State and Framework for Future Research , 2005, Circulation.

[17]  M. Gheorghiade,et al.  Vasopressin antagonism in heart failure. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  M. Gheorghiade,et al.  Reassessment of dobutamine, dopamine, and milrinone in the management of acute heart failure syndromes. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  A. Hoes,et al.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2005, European heart journal.

[20]  D. DeMets,et al.  Rationale and design of the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the Efficacy of Vasopressin antagonism in Heart Failure: Outcome Study with Tolvaptan (EVEREST). , 2005, Journal of cardiac failure.

[21]  K. Aaronson,et al.  Short-term risk of death after treatment with nesiritide for decompensated heart failure: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2005, JAMA.

[22]  K. Aaronson,et al.  Risk of Worsening Renal Function With Nesiritide in Patients With Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure , 2005, Circulation.

[23]  K. Adams,et al.  Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the United States: rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE). , 2005, American heart journal.

[24]  K. Dickstein,et al.  [Executive summary of the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute heart failure]. , 2005, Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[25]  U. Elkayam,et al.  Intravenous Nitroglycerin in the Treatment of Decompensated Heart Failure: Potential Benefits and Limitations , 2004, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics.

[26]  C. O'connor,et al.  Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF): rationale and design. , 2004, American heart journal.

[27]  Christopher M O'Connor,et al.  Effects of tolvaptan, a vasopressin antagonist, in patients hospitalized with worsening heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[28]  Christiane,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2004, Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics.

[29]  G. Fonarow,et al.  The Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE): opportunities to improve care of patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure. , 2003, Reviews in cardiovascular medicine.

[30]  M. Gheorghiade,et al.  Vasopressin V2-Receptor Blockade With Tolvaptan in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: Results From a Double-Blind, Randomized Trial , 2003, Circulation.

[31]  N Freemantle,et al.  The EuroHeart Failure survey programme-- a survey on the quality of care among patients with heart failure in Europe. Part 1: patient characteristics and diagnosis. , 2003, European heart journal.

[32]  James B. Young Intravenous nesiritide vs nitroglycerin for treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure: A randomized controlled trial , 2002 .

[33]  R. Califf,et al.  Short-term intravenous milrinone for acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[34]  Wolzt,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2003, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[35]  M. Cuffe Intravenous nesiritide vs nitroglycerin for treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[36]  P. O'Brien Procedures for comparing samples with multiple endpoints. , 1984, Biometrics.

[37]  F. Tristani,et al.  Effect of short-term infusion of sodium nitroprusside on mortality rate in acute myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular failure: results of a Veterans Administration cooperative study. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  P. Elteren On the combination of independent two-sample tests of wilcoxon : Corrected version , 1959 .