Discarded Labor:: Countervisualities for Representing AI Integration in Essential Work

This pictorial critically explores the role of visual media representations in the deployment of automated and artificially intelligent (AI) technologies within essential work sectors. We draw on an exhaustive review of local and national newspaper articles about automation in two waste labor industries (cleaning and recycling) over the last five years. We highlight a set of common visual tropes and move to challenge these representations by taking up the lens of countervisuality. Our analysis reveals that press photographs tend to focus on machines and the decision-makers who champion them, overlooking the work that it takes to integrate technology on the ground. Through our countervisuals, we depict the extensive efforts of waste workers to maintain AI technologies, and their potential for surveillance. Through visualizing under-recognized forms of labor that come after the design process ends, we highlight how an outsized emphasis on invention ignores waste workers’ expertise and needs over time.

[1]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Data Rhetoric and Uneasy Alliances: Data Advocacy in US Labor History , 2019, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[2]  E. Margolis,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods , 2011 .

[3]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Making Core Memory: Design Inquiry into Gendered Legacies of Engineering and Craftwork , 2018, CHI.

[4]  M. Six Silberman,et al.  Stories We Tell About Labor: Turkopticon and the Trouble with "Design" , 2016, CHI.

[5]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Making work visible , 1995, CACM.

[6]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Apply Now!: Fictional Job Postings as an Instrument to Discuss Interactive Futures of Work , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[7]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Parody in Place: Exposing Socio-spatial Exclusions in Data-Driven Maps with Design Parody , 2018, CHI.

[8]  Tega Brain,et al.  A ‘speculative pasts’ pedagogy: where speculative design meets historical thinking , 2019, Digit. Creativity.

[9]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Managerial Visions: Stories of Upgrading and Maintaining the Public Restroom with IoT , 2019, CHI.

[10]  Sasha Costanza-Chock,et al.  Design Justice , 2020 .

[11]  Lilly Irani The hidden faces of automation , 2016, XRDS.

[12]  N. Mirzoeff The Right to Look: A Counterhistory of Visuality , 2011 .

[13]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[14]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Behind the Lens: A Visual Exploration of Epistemological Commitments in HCI Research on the Home , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[15]  Marcus Banks,et al.  Visual methods in social research , 2001 .

[16]  Solon Barocas,et al.  Privacy at the Margins| Refractive Surveillance: Monitoring Customers to Manage Workers , 2018 .

[17]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming , 2013 .

[18]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation , 2012, DIS '12.

[19]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Biographical Prototypes: Reimagining Recognition and Disability in Design , 2019, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[20]  Daniela K. Rosner,et al.  A Voice of Process: Re-Presencing the Gendered Labor of Apollo Innovation , 2019 .

[21]  Kristina Höök,et al.  The IKEA Catalogue: Design Fiction in Academic and Industrial Collaborations , 2016, GROUP.

[22]  Juliane Freud,et al.  Visual Methods In Social Research , 2016 .

[23]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Anti-Solutionist Strategies: Seriously Silly Design Fiction , 2016, CHI.

[24]  Eva Knutz,et al.  The poetics of design fiction , 2013, DPPI.

[25]  Trevor Owens The Innovation Delusion: How Our Obsession with the New Has Disrupted the Work That Matters Most , 2021, The American Archivist.