Human visual processing oscillates: Evidence from a classification image technique

Recent investigations have proposed that visual information may be sampled in a discrete manner, similarly to the snapshots of a camera, but this hypothesis remains controversial. Moreover, assuming a discrete sampling of information, the properties of this sampling-for instance, the frequency at which it operates, and how it synchronizes with the environment-still need to be clarified. We systematically modulated the signal-to-noise ratio of faces through time and examined how it impacted face identification performance. Altogether, our results support the hypothesis of discrete sampling. Furthermore, they suggest that this mechanism may operate at a rate of about 10-15Hz and that it is synchronized with the onset of the stimulus.

[1]  Caroline Blais,et al.  The spatio-temporal dynamics of visual letter recognition , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[2]  R. L. Knoll,et al.  The Perception of Temporal Order: Fundamental Issues and a General Model , 1973 .

[3]  D. Purves,et al.  The wagon-wheel illusion in continuous light , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The blinking spotlight of attention , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Caroline Blais,et al.  Reading between Eye Saccades , 2009, PloS one.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Combining Spatial Extent and Peak Intensity to Test for Activations in Functional Imaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[7]  C. Koch,et al.  The continuous wagon wheel illusion is associated with changes in electroencephalogram power at approximately 13 Hz. , 2006, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  R. VanRullen,et al.  Neural correlates of the continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion: A functional MRI study , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[9]  K. Oatley,et al.  Judging the Order of Visual Stimuli , 1969, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  D. Purves,et al.  The wagon wheel illusion in movies and reality. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. VanRullen The continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion depends on, but is not identical to neuronal adaptation , 2007, Vision Research.

[12]  Erin Shubel,et al.  The spatiotemporal properties of visual completion measured by response classification. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[13]  C. Koch,et al.  The Continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion Is Associated with Changes in Electroencephalogram Power at ∼13 Hz , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Peter Neri,et al.  Temporal dynamics of directional selectivity in human vision. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[15]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Classification images: a tool to analyze visual strategies. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[16]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  A picture is worth thousands of trials: rendering the use of visual information from spiking neurons to recognition , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  Rescuing stimuli from invisibility: Inducing a momentary release from visual masking with pre-target entrainment , 2010, Cognition.

[18]  D. Eagleman,et al.  Evidence against the temporal subsampling account of illusory motion reversal. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[19]  C. Clifford,et al.  Illusory motion reversal in tune with motion detectors , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  To See or Not to See: Prestimulus α Phase Predicts Visual Awareness , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  C. Koch,et al.  Is perception discrete or continuous? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  David J. Heeger,et al.  Spatiotemporal mechanisms for detecting and identifying image features in human vision , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  G. Karmos,et al.  Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection , 2008, Science.

[24]  Peter Dixon,et al.  Likelihood ratios: A simple and flexible statistic for empirical psychologists , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  R. Ulrich Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  P. Venables,et al.  Periodicity in reaction time. , 1960, British journal of psychology.

[27]  A. Nobre,et al.  Temporal Expectation Improves the Quality of Sensory Information , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[29]  Richard W. Bowen,et al.  Two pulses seen as three flashes: A superposition analysis , 1989, Vision Research.

[30]  The wheels keep turning Reply to , 2005 .

[31]  A. Watson Derivation of the impulse response: comments on the method of Roufs and Blommaert , 1982, Vision Research.

[32]  D. Eagleman,et al.  Illusory motion reversal does not imply discrete processing: Reply to Rojas et al. , 2006, Vision Research.

[33]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  Making Waves in the Stream of Consciousness: Entraining Oscillations in EEG Alpha and Fluctuations in Visual Awareness with Rhythmic Visual Stimulation , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  P. Fries,et al.  Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically , 2012, Current Biology.

[35]  Do discreteness and rivalry coexist in illusory motion reversals? , 2006, Vision Research.

[36]  V. Manahilov,et al.  Spatiotemporal visual response to suprathreshold stimuli , 1995, Vision Research.

[37]  C. Rashbass,et al.  Unification of two contrasting models of the visual incremental threshold , 1976, Vision Research.

[38]  P L Latour,et al.  Evidence of internal clocks in the human operator. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[39]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[40]  R. VanRullen,et al.  Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  C W Tyler,et al.  Psychophysical derivation of the impulse response through generation of ultrabrief responses: complex inverse estimation without minimum-phase assumptions. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[42]  William A. Simpson,et al.  Illusory percepts of moving patterns due to discrete temporal sampling , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[43]  M. Jones,et al.  Temporal Aspects of Stimulus-Driven Attending in Dynamic Arrays , 2002, Psychological science.

[44]  P. Schyns,et al.  A picture is worth thousands of trials: rendering the use of visual information from spiking neurons to recognition , 2004, Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Accurate statistical tests for smooth classification images. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[47]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of face recognition in a flash: it's in the eyes , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[48]  C T White,et al.  Intermittency in reaction time and perception, and evoked response correlates of image quality. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[49]  R. VanRullen,et al.  The phase of ongoing EEG oscillations predicts visual perception , 2010 .

[50]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Temporal Oscillations in Human Perception , 1993 .

[51]  Ione Fine,et al.  Face adaptation does not improve performance on search or discrimination tasks. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[52]  D. Eagleman,et al.  Illusory motion reversal is caused by rivalry, not by perceptual snapshots of the visual field , 2004, Vision Research.

[53]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention-driven discrete sampling of motion perception. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  Rufin VanRullen,et al.  The continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion is object-based , 2006, Vision Research.