Chronic stroke motor recovery: duration of active neuromuscular stimulation

Active neuromuscular stimulation is an effective behavioral intervention for motor recovery improvements after a stroke. However, the most effective active neuromuscular stimulation durations have not been determined. The present experiment investigated active stimulation durations (0, 5, and 10 s) coupled with bilateral movements on progress toward motor recovery in wrist and finger extension. Twenty-six stroke survivors with chronic hemiparesis were randomly assigned to the stimulation duration groups, and subjects completed 4 days of rehabilitation training over a 2-week period. Mixed design analyses of variance on the Box and Block scores, chronometric reaction times, and force modulation of the sustained muscle contraction task revealed distinct motor recovery improvements for both the 5 and 10 s stimulation duration groups in comparison to the 0 s duration control group. Further, the number of blocks moved by the 10-s duration group exceeded those moved by the 5-s duration group. In conclusion, the 5 and 10 s duration active stimulation/bilateral movement groups decreased residual motor dysfunctions that persisted beyond 12 months post stroke.

[1]  L. Cohen.  Interaction between limbs during bimanual voluntary activity. , 1970, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  D G Altman,et al.  Concealing treatment allocation in randomised trials , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  R. Waters,et al.  Positional feedback and electrical stimulation: an automated treatment for the hemiplegic wrist. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Connecting Cortical and Behavioral Dynamics: Bimanual Coordination , 1998, Neural Computation.

[5]  J. Whitall,et al.  Repetitive Bilateral Arm Training With Rhythmic Auditory Cueing Improves Motor Function in Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke , 2000, Stroke.

[6]  H. Whiting,et al.  Motor development in children : aspects of coordination and control , 1986 .

[7]  M. Hallett,et al.  Improving hand function in chronic stroke. , 2002, Archives of neurology.

[8]  R. Teasell.  Stroke recovery and rehabilitation. , 2003, Stroke.

[9]  J A Kelso,et al.  Dynamic pattern generation in behavioral and neural systems. , 1988, Science.

[10]  M. Ladouceur,et al.  Clinical and Therapeutic Applications of Neuromuscular Stimulation: A Review of Current Use and Speculation into Future Developments , 2001, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[11]  S. Cramer,et al.  Computerized measurement of motor performance after stroke. , 1997, Stroke.

[12]  Michael V. Johnston,et al.  Fundamental neuroscience, 2nd edition: Edited by Duane E. Haines, PhD. 582 pp., illustrated. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2002. $52.00. ISBN 0-443-066035. , 2002 .

[13]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Mapping clinically relevant plasticity after stroke , 2000, Neuropharmacology.

[14]  N. A. Bernshteĭn.  The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[15]  A. Behrman,et al.  Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation. , 2000, Stroke.

[16]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[17]  F. Felici,et al.  Electromyogram changes during sustained contraction after resistance training in women in their 3rd and 8th decades , 2000, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[18]  P. Duncan,et al.  Defining post-stroke recovery: implications for design and interpretation of drug trials , 2000, Neuropharmacology.

[19]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recovery from stroke , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[20]  J. Chae,et al.  Intramuscular electromyographically controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation for upper limb recovery in chronic hemiplegia. , 2001, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[21]  T. Matyas,et al.  Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damaged by stroke? , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[22]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Recent Advances in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[23]  J. Kelso.  Pattern Formation in Speech and Limb Movements Involving Many Degrees of Freedom , 1986 .

[24]  A. Weiss,et al.  THE LOCUS OF REACTION TIME CHANGE WITH SET, MOTIVATION, AND AGE. , 1965, Journal of gerontology.

[25]  R. Craik,et al.  Timing, Intensity, and Duration of Rehabilitation for Hip Fracture and Stroke: Report of a Workshop at the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research , 2004, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[26]  S. Schultz.  Principles of Neural Science, 4th ed. , 2001 .

[27]  Randolph J. Nudo.  Role of Cortical Plasticity in Motor Recovery After Stroke , 1998 .

[28]  R. V. Emmerik,et al.  Dynamics of movement disorders , 1996 .

[29]  J. Cauraugh,et al.  Two Coupled Motor Recovery Protocols Are Better Than One: Electromyogram-Triggered Neuromuscular Stimulation and Bilateral Movements , 2002, Stroke.

[30]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[31]  Neurogenesis and apoptotic cell death. , 2003 .

[32]  D Goodman,et al.  On the nature of human interlimb coordination. , 1979, Science.

[33]  Jane E. Clark,et al.  Sensory information affords exploration of posture in newly walking infants and toddlers , 2000 .

[34]  M. Solomonow,et al.  Methods to reduce the variability of EMG power spectrum estimates. , 1998, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[35]  John Chae,et al.  Neuromuscular stimulation for motor relearning in hemiplegia , 1999 .