Macroecological signals of species interactions in the Danish avifauna

The role of intraspecific and interspecific interactions in structuring biotic communities at fine spatial scales is well documented, but the signature of species interactions at coarser spatial scales is unclear. We present evidence that species interactions may be a significant factor in mediating the regional assembly of the Danish avifauna. Because >95% of breeding species (n = 197) are migratory, we hypothesized that dispersal limitation would not be important and that breeding distributions would largely reflect resource availability and autecological habitat preferences. Instead, we detected a striking pattern of spatial segregation between ecologically similar species at two spatial scales with a suite of null models that factored in the spatial distribution of habitats in Denmark as well as population size and biomass of each species. Habitat utilization analyses indicated that community-wide patterns of spatial segregation could not be attributed to the patchy distribution of habitat or to gross differences in habitat utilization among ecologically similar species. We hypothesize that, when habitat patch size is limited, conspecific attraction in concert with interspecific territoriality may result in spatially segregated distributions of ecologically similar species at larger spatial scales. In the Danish avifauna, the effects of species interactions on community assembly appear pervasive and can be discerned at grain sizes up to four orders of magnitude larger than those of individual territories. These results suggest that species interactions should be incorporated into species distribution modeling algorithms designed to predict species occupancy patterns based on environmental variables.

[1]  M. Araújo,et al.  The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change , 2007 .

[2]  J. Gutiérrez,et al.  Results of a food addition experiment in a north‐central Chile small mammal assemblage: evidence for the role of “bottom‐up” factors , 2001 .

[3]  M. Houmark‐Nielsen,et al.  Timing and pattern of the last deglaciation in the Kattegat region, southwest Scandinavia , 2008 .

[4]  N. Gotelli.  Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns , 2000 .

[5]  N. Gotelli,et al.  NULL MODELS IN ECOLOGY , 1996 .

[6]  D. Schluter,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF GEOSPIZA DIFFICILIS IN RELATION TO G. FULIGINOSA IN THE GALÁPAGOS ISLANDS: TESTS OF THREE HYPOTHESES , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  S. Wright.  Density compensation in island avifaunas , 2004, Oecologia.

[8]  C. Tracy,et al.  On the Determinants of Extinction , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[9]  D. Lack.  Habitat Selection in Birds. With Special Reference to the Effects of Afforestation on the Breckland Avifauna , 1933 .

[10]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Heterospecific attraction and food resources in migrants' breeding patch selection in northern boreal forest , 1998, Oecologia.

[11]  M. Caley,et al.  INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION AND COEXISTENCE IN A GUILD OF CORAL-DWELLING FISHES , 2001 .

[12]  D. Gordon,et al.  RESOURCE‐DEPENDENT INTERACTIONS AND THE ORGANIZATION OF DESERT ANT COMMUNITIES , 2003 .

[13]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[14]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  The empirical Bayes approach as a tool to identify non-random species associations , 2010, Oecologia.

[15]  E. Pianka,et al.  Organization in Natural Assemblages of Desert Lizards and Tropical Fishes , 1990 .

[16]  H. Southern,et al.  Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa; the Birds of the Western Palearctic , 1978 .

[17]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  The Assembly of Species Communities: Chance or Competition? , 1979 .

[18]  M. Araújo,et al.  How Does Climate Change Affect Biodiversity? , 2006, Science.

[19]  T. Schoener,et al.  Some Methods for Calculating Competition Coefficients from Resource-Utilization Spectra , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[20]  M. K. Borregaard,et al.  Prevalence of intraspecific relationships between range size and abundance in Danish birds , 2006 .

[21]  H. Hoi,et al.  Territorial spacing and interspecific competition in three species of reed warblers , 1991, Oecologia.

[22]  E. Pianka,et al.  Niche overlap and diffuse competition. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  J. Stamps,et al.  The effect of conspecifics on habitat selection in territorial species , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  K. Crowell.  Reduced Interspecific Competition among the Birds of Bermuda , 1962 .

[25]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Ecological assembly rules : perspectives, advances, retreats , 1999 .

[26]  Lewi Stone,et al.  Competitive exclusion, or species aggregation? , 1992, Oecologia.

[27]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Competition and the structure of bird communities. , 1975, Monographs in population biology.

[28]  S. Hurlbert.  The Nonconcept of Species Diversity: A Critique and Alternative Parameters. , 1971, Ecology.

[29]  L. Stone,et al.  The checkerboard score and species distributions , 1990, Oecologia.

[30]  B. Tershy,et al.  Introduced rats indirectly change marine rocky intertidal communities from algae- to invertebrate-dominated , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Gerald J. Niemi,et al.  The Grinnellian Niche of the Wood Thrush , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[32]  Joshua Ladau,et al.  Validation of null model tests using Neyman–Pearson hypothesis testing theory , 2008, Theoretical Ecology.

[33]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Interspecific aggression and habitat selection by Amazonian birds , 1995 .

[34]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Communities , 1976, Nature.

[35]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[36]  R. Paine,et al.  Marine rocky shores and community ecology : an experimentalist's perspective , 1995 .

[37]  J. Diamond,et al.  Density Compensation in Island Faunas , 1972 .

[38]  Shelley A. Hinsley,et al.  Habitat and landscape factors influencing the presence of individual breeding bird species in woodland fragments , 1995 .

[39]  J. Grinnell.  Field Tests of Theories Concerning Distributional Control , 1917, The American Naturalist.

[40]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Species diversity in ecological communities: edited by Robert E. Ricklefs and Dolph Schluter University of Chicago Press, 1993. $105.00 hbk, $35.00 pbk (414 pages) ISBN 0 226 71822 0/0 226 71823 9 , 1994 .

[41]  János Podani,et al.  RANDOMIZATION OF PRESENCE–ABSENCE MATRICES: COMMENTS AND NEW ALGORITHMS , 2004 .

[42]  J. Grinnell.  The Niche-Relationships of the California Thrasher , 1917 .

[43]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[44]  John A. Wiens,et al.  The Ecology Of Bird Communities , 1989 .

[45]  E. Danchin,et al.  The evolution of coloniality: the emergence of new perspectives. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  Markov chain models predict the consequences of experimental extinctions , 2004 .

[47]  M. Cody.  Habitat Selection and Interspecific Territoriality among the Sylviid Warblers of England and Sweden , 1978 .

[48]  T. Reed.  Interspecific territoriality in the chaffinch and great tit on islands and the mainland of Scotland: Playback and removal experiments , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  H. Gleason,et al.  The individualistic concept of the plant association , 1939 .

[50]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Patterns and Consequences of Interspecific Competition in Natural Communities: A Review of Field Experiments with Plants , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[51]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Null model analysis of species nestedness patterns. , 2007, Ecology.

[52]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  What Is the Allee Effect , 1999 .

[53]  W. Forstmeier,et al.  Does interspecific competition affect territorial distribution of birds? A long-term study on Siberian Phylloscopus warblers , 2000 .

[54]  Stephens,et al.  Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[55]  B. G. Murray.  THE ORIGINS OF ADAPTIVE INTERSPECIFIC TERRITORIALISM , 1981 .

[56]  Island Biogeography of Populations: An Introduced Species Transforms Survival Patterns , 2005, Science.

[57]  G. Orians,et al.  Interspecific Territories of Birds , 1964 .

[58]  Michael E. Gilpin,et al.  Examination of the “null” model of connor and simberloff for species co-occurrences on Islands , 2004, Oecologia.

[59]  V. Lehsten,et al.  Null models for species co-occurrence patterns: assessing bias and minimum iteration number for the sequential swap , 2006 .

[60]  F. Vuilleumier.  Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Volume V: Tyrant Flycatchers to Thrushes , 1990 .

[61]  Martin L. Cody,et al.  Habitat selection in birds , 1986 .

[62]  Competition and the Structure of Bird Communities , 1976 .

[63]  E. Connor,et al.  The spatial consequences of interspecific competition , 1987 .

[64]  C. Catchpole.  Interspecific territorialism and competition in Acrocephalus warblers as revealed by playback experiments in areas of sympathy and allopatry , 1978, Animal Behaviour.

[65]  P. Choler,et al.  FACILITATION AND COMPETITION ON GRADIENTS IN ALPINE PLANT COMMUNITIES , 2001 .

[66]  L. Lawlor,et al.  Overlap, Similarity, and Competition Coefficients , 1980 .

[67]  N. Gotelli,et al.  Co-occurrence of Australian land birds : Diamond's assembly rules revisited , 1997 .