The effect of static and dynamic spatially structured disturbances on a locally dispersing population.

Previous models of locally dispersing populations have shown that in the presence of spatially structured fixed habitat heterogeneity, increasing local spatial autocorrelation in habitat generally has a beneficial effect on such populations, increasing equilibrium population density. It has also been shown that with large-scale disturbance events which simultaneously affect contiguous blocks of sites, increasing spatial autocorrelation in the disturbances has a harmful effect, decreasing equilibrium population density. Here, spatial population models are developed which include both of these spatially structured exogenous influences, to determine how they interact with each other and with the endogenously generated spatial structure produced by the population dynamics. The models show that when habitat is fragmented and disturbance occurs at large spatial scales, the population cannot persist no matter how large its birth rate, an effect not seen in previous simpler models of this type. The behavior of the model is also explored when the local autocorrelation of habitat heterogeneity and disturbance events are equal, i.e. the two effects occur at the same spatial scale. When this scale parameter is very small, habitat fragmentation prevents the population from persisting because sites attempting to reproduce will drop most of their offspring on unsuitable sites; when the parameter is very large, large-scale disturbance events drive the population to extinction. Population levels reach their maximum at intermediate values of the scale parameter, and the critical values in the model show that the population will persist most easily at these intermediate scales of spatial influences. The models are investigated via spatially explicit stochastic simulations, traditional (infinite-dispersal) and improved (local-dispersal) mean-field approximations, and pair approximations.

[1]  Robert M. May,et al.  Dynamics of metapopulations : habitat destruction and competitive coexistence , 1992 .

[2]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  On moment closures for population dynamics in continuous space. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Ecological Interactions in Patchy Environments: From Patch-Occupancy Models to Cellular Automata , 1992 .

[4]  T. Liggett Interacting Particle Systems , 1985 .

[5]  S. Collinge,et al.  The influences of patch shape and boundary contrast on insect response to fragmentation in California grasslands , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  B M Bolker,et al.  Analytic models for the patchy spread of plant disease , 1999, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[7]  Charles Ashbacher,et al.  An Illustrated Guide to Theoretical Ecology , 2003 .

[8]  David A. Rand,et al.  Correlation Equations and Pair Approximations for Spatial Ecologies , 1999 .

[9]  B. Bolker,et al.  Using Moment Equations to Understand Stochastically Driven Spatial Pattern Formation in Ecological Systems , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[10]  Akira Sasaki,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Population: The Lattice Lotka-Volterra Model , 1992 .

[11]  Peter Stoll,et al.  INTRASPECIFIC AGGREGATION ALTERS COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS IN EXPERIMENTAL PLANT COMMUNITIES , 2001 .

[12]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Metapopulation models for extinction threshold in spatially correlated landscapes. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  A. Sasaki,et al.  ‘Small worlds’ and the evolution of virulence: infection occurs locally and at a distance , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  J. Roland,et al.  Insect parasitoid species respond to forest structure at different spatial scales , 1997, Nature.

[15]  B. Bolker,et al.  Spatial Moment Equations for Plant Competition: Understanding Spatial Strategies and the Advantages of Short Dispersal , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[16]  T. Dawson,et al.  Long-distance plant dispersal and habitat fragmentation: identifying conservation targets for spatial landscape planning under climate change , 2005 .

[17]  Akira Sasaki,et al.  Pathogen invasion and host extinction in lattice structured populations , 1994, Journal of mathematical biology.

[18]  Boots,et al.  The evolutionary dynamics of local infection and global reproduction in host–parasite interactions , 2000 .

[19]  Cinda Davis,et al.  MOVEMENT RESPONSES TO PATCH STRUCTURE IN EXPERIMENTAL FRACTAL LANDSCAPES , 1999 .

[20]  R. Lande,et al.  Spatial Scale of Population Synchrony: Environmental Correlation versus Dispersal and Density Regulation , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[21]  J. L. Dooley,et al.  DEMOGRAPHIC RESPONSES TO HABITAT FRAGMENTATION: EXPERIMENTAL TESTS AT THE LANDSCAPE AND PATCH SCALE , 1998 .

[22]  David E. Hiebeler,et al.  Stochastic Spatial Models: From Simulations to Mean Field and Local Structure Approximations , 1997 .

[23]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  Forest Spatial Dynamics with Gap Expansion: Total Gap Area and Gap Size Distribution , 1996 .

[24]  Glenn R. Matlack,et al.  Consequences of low mobility in spatially and temporally heterogeneous ecosystems , 2004 .

[25]  S. Ellner,et al.  Pair approximation for lattice models with multiple interaction scales. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  G. J. Gibson,et al.  Comparing approximations to spatio-temporal models for epidemics with local spread , 2001, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[27]  D. Hiebeler Competition between near and far dispersers in spatially structured habitats. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[28]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  Lattice population dynamics for plants with dispersing seeds and Vegetative propagation , 1994, Researches on Population Ecology.

[29]  John G. Kie,et al.  LANDSCAPE HETEROGENEITY AT DIFFERING SCALES: EFFECTS ON SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF MULE DEER , 2002 .

[30]  D. Hiebeler Spatially correlated disturbances in a locally dispersing population model. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  David Hiebeler A Cellular Automaton SIS Epidemiological Model with Spatially Clustered Recoveries , 2005, International Conference on Computational Science.

[32]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds on fractal landscapes , 1999 .

[33]  J. Mcglade,et al.  Advanced ecological theory : principles and applications , 1999 .

[34]  David Hiebeler Dynamics and Resistance to Neighborhood Perturbations of Discrete-and Continuous-Time Cellular Automata , 2006, J. Cell. Autom..

[35]  Athanasios S. Kallimanis,et al.  Metapopulation Extinction Risk under Spatially Autocorrelated Disturbance , 2005 .

[36]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Local Explanations of Landscape Patterns: Can Analytical Approaches Approximate Simulation Models of Spatial Processes? , 1998, Ecosystems.

[37]  Sheldon M. Ross,et al.  Introduction to probability models , 1975 .

[38]  Edwin K. P. Chong,et al.  Discrete event systems: Modeling and performance analysis , 1994, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[39]  Benjamin M Bolker,et al.  Combining endogenous and exogenous spatial variability in analytical population models. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[40]  J. Gamarra Metapopulations in multifractal landscapes: on the role of spatial aggregation , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Stochastic Spatial Models: A User's Guide to Ecological Applications , 1994 .

[42]  Neuhauser Habitat Destruction and Competitive Coexistence in Spatially Explicit Models with Local Interactions. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[43]  B. Bolker,et al.  SPATIAL SIGNATURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HETEROGENEITY, DISPERSAL, AND COMPETITION IN SUCCESSIONAL GRASSLANDS , 2005 .

[44]  D. Hiebeler,et al.  Competing populations on fragmented landscapes with spatially structured heterogeneities: improved landscape generation and mixed dispersal strategies , 2007, Journal of mathematical biology.

[45]  David E. Hiebeler,et al.  Populations on fragmented landscapes with spatially structured heterogeneities : Landscape generation and local dispersal , 2000 .

[46]  Kirk A. Moloney,et al.  The Effects of Disturbance Architecture on Landscape-Level Population Dynamics , 1996 .

[47]  Paolo De Los Rios,et al.  Cluster approximations for epidemic processes: a systematic description of correlations beyond the pair level. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[48]  R. Durrett,et al.  From individuals to epidemics. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[49]  Minus van Baalen,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Pair Approximations for Different Spatial Geometries , 2000 .

[50]  M. Drechsler,et al.  Are spatially correlated or uncorrelated disturbance regimes better for the survival of species , 2003 .