At the leading edge of three-dimensional cell migration

Summary Cells migrating on flat two-dimensional (2D) surfaces use actin polymerization to extend the leading edge of the plasma membrane during lamellipodia-based migration. This mode of migration is not universal; it represents only one of several mechanisms of cell motility in three-dimensional (3D) environments. The distinct modes of 3D migration are strongly dependent on the physical properties of the extracellular matrix, and they can be distinguished by the structure of the leading edge and the degree of matrix adhesion. How are these distinct modes of cell motility in 3D environments related to each other and regulated? Recent studies show that the same type of cell migrating in 3D extracellular matrix can switch between different leading edge structures. This mode-switching behavior, or plasticity, by a single cell suggests that the apparent diversity of motility mechanisms is integrated by a common intracellular signaling pathway that governs the mode of cell migration. In this Commentary, we propose that the mode of 3D cell migration is governed by a signaling axis involving cell–matrix adhesions, RhoA signaling and actomyosin contractility, and that this might represent a universal mechanism that controls 3D cell migration.

[1]  Y. Ohta,et al.  FilGAP, a Rho/Rho-associated protein kinase–regulated GTPase-activating protein for Rac, controls tumor cell migration , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[2]  I. Tolic-Nørrelykke,et al.  Identification and regulation of a molecular module for bleb-based cell motility. , 2012, Developmental cell.

[3]  Martin Bergert,et al.  Cell mechanics control rapid transitions between blebs and lamellipodia during migration , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Pere Roca-Cusachs,et al.  Finding the weakest link – exploring integrin-mediated mechanical molecular pathways , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[5]  Ulrich S Schwarz,et al.  United we stand – integrating the actin cytoskeleton and cell–matrix adhesions in cellular mechanotransduction , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[6]  Kevin W. Eliceiri,et al.  Microtubules regulate GEF-H1 in response to extracellular matrix stiffness , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[7]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Micro-environmental control of cell migration – myosin IIA is required for efficient migration in fibrillar environments through control of cell adhesion dynamics , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[8]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Nonpolarized signaling reveals two distinct modes of 3D cell migration , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  Erik S. Welf,et al.  Migrating fibroblasts reorient directionality by a metastable, PI3K-dependent mechanism , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  C. Marshall,et al.  The metastasis gene NEDD9 product acts through integrin β3 and Src to promote mesenchymal motility and inhibit amoeboid motility , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[11]  W. Petroll,et al.  Corneal stromal cells use both high- and low-contractility migration mechanisms in 3-D collagen matrices. , 2012, Experimental cell research.

[12]  Shawn M. Gomez,et al.  Arp2/3 Is Critical for Lamellipodia and Response to Extracellular Matrix Cues but Is Dispensable for Chemotaxis , 2012, Cell.

[13]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Membrane Tension Maintains Cell Polarity by Confining Signals to the Leading Edge during Neutrophil Migration , 2012, Cell.

[14]  P. Hordijk,et al.  Control of Rho GTPase function by BAR-domains , 2012, Small GTPases.

[15]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho protein crosstalk: another social network? , 2011, Trends in cell biology.

[16]  D. Bar-Sagi,et al.  RAS oncogenes: weaving a tumorigenic web , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[17]  S. Linder,et al.  Degrading devices: invadosomes in proteolytic cell invasion. , 2011, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[18]  E. Sahai,et al.  ROCK and JAK1 signaling cooperate to control actomyosin contractility in tumor cells and stroma. , 2011, Cancer cell.

[19]  A. Ridley.  Life at the Leading Edge , 2011, Cell.

[20]  Nicola Elvassore,et al.  Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction , 2011, Nature.

[21]  Thomas Ludwig,et al.  Interdependency of cell adhesion, force generation and extracellular proteolysis in matrix remodeling , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[22]  C. Marshall,et al.  An ezrin-rich, rigid uropod-like structure directs movement of amoeboid blebbing cells , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[23]  Richard Superfine,et al.  The Rho GEFs LARG and GEF-H1 regulate the mechanical response to force on integrins , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[24]  C. Turner,et al.  Distinct roles for paxillin and Hic-5 in regulating breast cancer cell morphology, invasion, and metastasis , 2011, Molecular biology of the cell.

[25]  P. Chavrier,et al.  Contractility of the cell rear drives invasion of breast tumor cells in 3D Matrigel , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  W. Petroll,et al.  Cell motility and mechanics in three-dimensional collagen matrices. , 2010, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[27]  M. Sixt,et al.  Mechanisms of force generation and force transmission during interstitial leukocyte migration , 2010, EMBO reports.

[28]  C. Marshall,et al.  The plasticity of cytoskeletal dynamics underlying neoplastic cell migration. , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.

[29]  Pere Roca-Cusachs,et al.  Stretchy proteins on stretchy substrates: the important elements of integrin-mediated rigidity sensing. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[30]  Yi I. Wu,et al.  Light-mediated activation reveals a key role for Rac in collective guidance of cell movement in vivo , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[31]  J. Spatz,et al.  Adaptive force transmission in amoeboid cell migration , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[32]  P. Friedl,et al.  Interstitial cell migration: integrin-dependent and alternative adhesion mechanisms , 2009, Cell and Tissue Research.

[33]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of Clustering of alpha(5)beta(1) integrins determines adhesion strength whereas alpha(v)beta(3) and talin enable mechanotransduction. , 2009 .

[34]  Michael Sixt,et al.  Mechanical modes of 'amoeboid' cell migration. , 2009, Current opinion in cell biology.

[35]  Pere Roca-Cusachs,et al.  Clustering of α5β1 integrins determines adhesion strength whereas αvβ3 and talin enable mechanotransduction , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion , 2009, Nature.

[37]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  A genetically-encoded photoactivatable Rac controls the motility of living cells , 2009, Nature.

[38]  Victoria Sanz-Moreno,et al.  Rho-GTPase signaling drives melanoma cell plasticity , 2009, Cell cycle.

[39]  D. Yamazaki,et al.  Involvement of Rac and Rho signaling in cancer cell motility in 3D substrates , 2009, Oncogene.

[40]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[41]  Peter Friedl,et al.  Proteolytic interstitial cell migration: a five-step process , 2009, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[42]  Paolo P. Provenzano,et al.  Contact guidance mediated three-dimensional cell migration is regulated by Rho/ROCK-dependent matrix reorganization. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[43]  E. Sahai,et al.  Rac Activation and Inactivation Control Plasticity of Tumor Cell Movement , 2008, Cell.

[44]  Guillaume Charras,et al.  Blebs lead the way: how to migrate without lamellipodia , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[45]  Miguel Vicente-Manzanares,et al.  Actin and α-actinin orchestrate the assembly and maturation of nascent adhesions in a myosin II motor-independent manner , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[46]  M. Sixt,et al.  Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing , 2008, Nature.

[47]  E. Sahai,et al.  PDK1 regulates cancer cell motility by antagonising inhibition of ROCK1 by RhoE , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[48]  H. Higgs,et al.  The many faces of actin: matching assembly factors with cellular structures , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[49]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  The emergence of ECM mechanics and cytoskeletal tension as important regulators of cell function , 2007, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[50]  M. Humphries,et al.  Syndecan-4–dependent Rac1 regulation determines directional migration in response to the extracellular matrix , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[51]  Colin K. Choi,et al.  Regulation of protrusion, adhesion dynamics, and polarity by myosins IIA and IIB in migrating cells , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[52]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Differential Transmission of Actin Motion Within Focal Adhesions , 2007, Science.

[53]  Claire M Brown,et al.  Probing the integrin-actin linkage using high-resolution protein velocity mapping , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[54]  N. Carragher,et al.  Calpain 2 and Src dependence distinguishes mesenchymal and amoeboid modes of tumour cell invasion: a link to integrin function , 2006, Oncogene.

[55]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[56]  John S. Condeelis,et al.  ROCK- and Myosin-Dependent Matrix Deformation Enables Protease-Independent Tumor-Cell Invasion In Vivo , 2006, Current Biology.

[57]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  L. Mahadevan,et al.  Non-equilibration of hydrostatic pressure in blebbing cells , 2005, Nature.

[59]  A. Sonnenberg,et al.  Integrins control motile strategy through a Rho–cofilin pathway , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[60]  C. Marshall,et al.  Cdc42–MRCK and Rho–ROCK signalling cooperate in myosin phosphorylation and cell invasion , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[61]  G. Danuser,et al.  Two Distinct Actin Networks Drive the Protrusion of Migrating Cells , 2004, Science.

[62]  K. Hahn,et al.  Activation of Endogenous Cdc42 Visualized in Living Cells , 2004, Science.

[63]  P. Janmey,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels , 2004, Nature.

[64]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Periodic Lamellipodial Contractions Correlate with Rearward Actin Waves , 2004, Cell.

[65]  P. Friedl.  Prespecification and plasticity: shifting mechanisms of cell migration. , 2004, Current opinion in cell biology.

[66]  G. Borisy,et al.  Cell Migration: Integrating Signals from Front to Back , 2003, Science.

[67]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Differing modes of tumour cell invasion have distinct requirements for Rho/ROCK signalling and extracellular proteolysis , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[68]  D. Ingber.  Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[69]  Gary G. Borisy,et al.  Mechanism of filopodia initiation by reorganization of a dendritic network , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[70]  Frederick Grinnell,et al.  Dendritic fibroblasts in three-dimensional collagen matrices. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[71]  A. Strongin,et al.  Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[72]  A. Maddox,et al.  RhoA is required for cortical retraction and rigidity during mitotic cell rounding , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[73]  Arnoud Sonnenberg,et al.  The fibronectin-binding integrins α5β1 and αvβ3 differentially modulate RhoA–GTP loading, organization of cell matrix adhesions, and fibronectin fibrillogenesis , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[74]  Shu Chien,et al.  Effects of cell tension on the small GTPase Rac , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[75]  Fumio Matsumura,et al.  Distinct Roles of Rock (Rho-Kinase) and Mlck in Spatial Regulation of Mlc Phosphorylation for Assembly of Stress Fibers and Focal Adhesions in 3t3 Fibroblasts , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[76]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[77]  J. Schwarzbauer,et al.  Regulation of fibronectin matrix assembly by activated Ras in transformed cells , 2000, Oncogene.

[78]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Characteristics of a membrane reservoir buffering membrane tension. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[79]  M. Monden,et al.  Distinct actions and cooperative roles of ROCK and mDia in Rho small G protein-induced reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[80]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-mediated Contractility Exposes a Cryptic Site in Fibronectin and Induces Fibronectin Matrix Assembly , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[81]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  K. Jacobson,et al.  The composition and dynamics of cell-substratum adhesions in locomoting fish keratocytes. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[83]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process , 1996, Cell.

[84]  Anne J. Ridley,et al.  The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors , 1992, Cell.

[85]  W. T. Chen,et al.  Proteolytic activity of specialized surface protrusions formed at rosette contact sites of transformed cells. , 1989, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[86]  R. Hynes,et al.  Changes in integrin receptors on oncogenically transformed cells , 1989, Cell.

[87]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Cytoskeletal dynamics and nerve growth , 1988, Neuron.

[88]  G. Gundersen,et al.  Selective stabilization of microtubules oriented toward the direction of cell migration. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[89]  M. Koonce,et al.  Reactivation of organelle movements along the cytoskeletal framework of a giant freshwater ameba , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[90]  J. Trinkaus,et al.  Protrusive activity, mode and rate of locomotion, and pattern of adhesion of Fundulus deep cells during gastrulation , 1983 .

[91]  S J Singer,et al.  Membrane insertion at the leading edge of motile fibroblasts. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[92]  K. Fujiwara,et al.  Collagen modulates cell shape and cytoskeleton of embryonic corneal and fibroma fibroblasts: distribution of actin, alpha-actinin, and myosin. , 1982, Developmental biology.

[93]  S. Singer,et al.  Polarization of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-organizing center in cultured fibroblasts at the edge of an experimental wound. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[94]  J. Shields,et al.  Lymphocyte locomotion and attachment on two-dimensional surfaces and in three-dimensional matrices , 1982, The Journal of cell biology.

[95]  G. Albrecht‐Buehler,et al.  Autonomous movements of cytoplasmic fragments. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[96]  P. Jones,et al.  Destruction of extracellular matrices containing glycoproteins, elastin, and collagen by metastatic human tumor cells. , 1980, Cancer research.

[97]  I. Pastan,et al.  Mutants of Balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts defective in adhesiveness to substratum: evidence for alteration in cell surface proteins. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[98]  J. Bard,et al.  The behavior of fibroblasts from the developing avian cornea. Morphology and movement in situ and in vitro , 1975, The Journal of cell biology.

[99]  A. Dipasquale.  Locomotion of epithelial cells. Factors involved in extension of the leading edge. , 1975, Experimental cell research.

[100]  I. Gelfand,et al.  Effect of colcemid on the locomotory behaviour of fibroblasts. , 1970, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[101]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. II. "RRuffling". , 1970, Experimental cell research.

[102]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. I. Movements of the leading edge. , 1970, Experimental cell research.

[103]  L. Tilney.  Studies on the microtubules in heliozoa. IV. The effect of colchicine on the formation and maintenance of the axopodia and the redevelopment of pattern in Actinosphaerium nucleofilum (Barrett). , 1968, Journal of cell science.

[104]  C. Dobell.  The Biology of the Protozoa , 1926, Nature.

[105]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  Responses of Cells to Adhesion-Mediated Signals: A Universal Mechanism , 2011 .

[106]  P. Friedl,et al.  The Journal of Cell Biology , 2002 .

[107]  H Bebie,et al.  Protrusive activity quantitatively determines the rate and direction of cell locomotion. , 1996, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[108]  A K Harris,et al.  Locomotion of tissue culture cells considered in relation to ameboid locomotion. , 1994, International review of cytology.

[109]  T. Mitchison.  Actin based motility on retraction fibers in mitotic PtK2 cells. , 1992, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[110]  D. Hartshorne,et al.  Calyculin-A increases the level of protein phosphorylation and changes the shape of 3T3 fibroblasts. , 1991, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[111]  John J. Lee,et al.  An illustrated guide to the protozoa , 1985 .

[112]  N. Allen,et al.  Cytoplasmic streaming in amoeboid movement. , 1978, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[113]  J. Trinkaus.  Surface activity and locomotion of Fundulus deep cells during blastula and gastrula stages. , 1973, Developmental biology.

[114]  E. Bovee.  Morphological Differences among Pseudopodia of Various Small Amebae and Their Functional Significance1 , 1964 .

[115]  P. Rao,et al.  Mechanistic Basis of Rho Gtpase-induced Extracellular Matrix Synthesis in Trabecular Meshwork Cells Running Head: Rho Gtpase-induced Cellular Contraction and Ecm Synthesis , 2022 .