Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] K. Rayner,et al. Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.
[2] Seth N. Greenberg,et al. Allocation of Visuo-Spatial Attention and Saccade Programming During Reading , 2000 .
[3] R. E. Morrison,et al. Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[4] Frans W Cornelissen,et al. The Eyelink Toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[5] Wei Zhou,et al. Lexical and sublexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[6] Erik D. Reichle,et al. The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[7] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[8] A. Jacobs,et al. Event-Related Potentials Reveal Rapid Verification of Predicted Visual Input , 2009, PloS one.
[9] J. Henderson,et al. Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[10] Ralf Engbert,et al. ICAT: a computational model for the adaptive control of fixation durations , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[11] Denis Drieghe,et al. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements during reading , 2011 .
[12] Victor Kuperman,et al. The effect of word position on eye-movements in sentence and paragraph reading , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[13] Sébastien Miellet,et al. Phonological codes are assembled before word fixation: Evidence from boundary paradigm in sentence reading , 2004, Brain and Language.
[14] Simon P. Liversedge,et al. Eye movements when reading disappearing text: The importance of the word to the right of fixation , 2006, Vision Research.
[15] R. Kliegl,et al. Adult age differences in the perceptual span during reading. , 2011, Psychology and aging.
[16] Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow,et al. Pay now or pay later: aging and the role of boundary salience in self-regulation of conceptual integration in sentence processing. , 2010, Psychology and aging.
[17] Keith Rayner,et al. Parafoveal processing in reading , 2011, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[18] Ralf Engbert,et al. A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing , 2002, Vision Research.
[19] Sarah J. White,et al. Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[20] Alexander Geyken,et al. dlexDB : eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung , 2011 .
[21] A. Kennedy,et al. Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[22] A W Inhoff,et al. Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: the role of letter and word units. , 1990, Acta psychologica.
[23] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[24] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Mathematical models of eye movements in reading: a possible role for autonomous saccades , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.
[25] M. Brysbaert,et al. Eye Movement Control during Reading: Foveal Load and Parafoveal Processing , 1999, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[26] K. Rayner. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.
[27] J. Shaffer. Reorganization of variables in analysis of variance and multidimensional contingency tables. , 1977 .
[28] K. Rayner,et al. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.
[29] Marc Brysbaert,et al. A test of parafoveal‐on‐foveal effects with pairs of orthographically related words , 2004 .
[30] Robin K. Morris,et al. Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[31] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.
[32] Carrick C. Williams,et al. Previewing the neighborhood: the role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[33] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.
[34] Robert W. Kentridge,et al. Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading? , 2004, Vision Research.
[35] D. Balota,et al. The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.
[36] K. Arbuthnott,et al. Asymmetric switch cost and backward inhibition: Carryover activation and inhibition in switching between tasks of unequal difficulty. , 2008, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[37] Ronan G. Reilly,et al. Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.
[38] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[39] John M. Henderson,et al. EVIDENCE FOR THE USE OF PHONOLOGICAL REPRESENTATIONS DURING TRANSSACCADIC WORD RECOGNITION , 1995 .
[40] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Reading strategy modulates parafoveal-on-foveal effects in sentence reading , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[41] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[42] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Eye Movement Control during Reading: Effects of Word Frequency and Orthographic Familiarity Word Frequency Effects , 2022 .
[43] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[44] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.
[45] A. Kennedy,et al. The influence of parafoveal typographical errors on eye movements in reading , 2004 .
[46] A. Pollatsek,et al. The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[47] M A Just,et al. A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.
[48] A W Inhoff,et al. Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial? , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[49] Keith Rayner,et al. Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: effects of reading skill. , 2005, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[50] Jukka Hyönä,et al. Do frequency characteristics of nonfixated words influence the processing of fixated words during reading? , 2004 .
[51] Alan Kennedy,et al. Parafoveal Processing in Word Recognition , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[52] K. Rayner,et al. Eye movements and display change detection during reading. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[53] Stefanie I. Becker,et al. Eye Movement Control , 2014, Journal of ophthalmology.
[54] G. V. Simpson,et al. Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.
[55] R. Koenker. Quantile Regression: Fundamentals of Quantile Regression , 2005 .
[56] Jukka Hyönä,et al. Foveal and parafoveal processing during reading. , 2011 .
[57] Susan Kemper,et al. Constraints on language : aging, grammar, and memory , 2002 .
[58] Ralf Engbert,et al. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[59] Ralf Engbert,et al. Microsaccades are triggered by low retinal image slip. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[60] A W Inhoff,et al. Parafoveal word perception: A case against semantic preprocessing , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.
[61] G. McConkie,et al. Eye movements and integrating information across fixations. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[62] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.
[63] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Semantic preview benefit during reading. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[64] R H S Carpenter,et al. An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. , 2005, Psychological review.
[65] K. Kraus,et al. The DWDS corpus: A reference corpus for the German language of the 20 century , 2006 .
[66] Ralf Engbert,et al. The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model , 2012, Visual cognition.
[67] Ralf Engbert,et al. Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention , 2003, Vision Research.
[68] G. McConkie,et al. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .
[69] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[70] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Testing Age Invariance in Language Processes , 2002 .
[71] D G Pelli,et al. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[72] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[73] D. Balota,et al. Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.