Breaking the vicious circle of categorizing students in school

Abstract Teachers categorizing of students profoundly affects the educational process and can subvert open teacher–student communication and create a vicious circle of student's lack of support and academic failure. In this article we use data from a Change Laboratory intervention in a senior secondary school in order to study the possibilities of changing the way teachers construct students as objects of their work and overcoming this vicious circle. We analyze categorization as a form of thinking based on empirical generalization and conceptualize its opposite as a dialectical process of constructing individual students' specific potentials and learning problems as the object of teachers' work. For this the teachers' need new kinds of tools that mediate the teacher–student interaction in a way that supports teachers' and students' mutual learning and support. Previous studies have shown a number of steps that are necessary for such a remediation of the teacher–student interaction to take place. In this study, we test and elaborate these observations.

[1]  Åsa Mäkitalo,et al.  Talk in institutional context and institutional context in talk: Categories as situated practices , 2002 .

[2]  Jeremy Kilpatrick,et al.  Types of Generalization in Instruction: Logical and Psychological Problems in the Structuring of School Curricula , 1990 .

[3]  M. Hallinan,et al.  Handicapping the Handicapped: Decision Making in Students' Educational Careers. , 1988 .

[4]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[5]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Can a School Community Learn to Master its Own Future? An Activity‐Theoretical Study of Expansive Learning Among Middle School Teachers , 2008 .

[6]  A. Sannino Breaking out of a professional abstraction: The pupil as materialized object for trainee teachers , 2010 .

[7]  D. Olson Psychological Theory and Educational Reform: How School Remakes Mind and Society , 2003 .

[8]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  From Stabilization Knowledge to Possibility Knowledge in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[9]  C. Tolman,et al.  The Metaphysic of Relations in Klaus Riegel’s ‘Dialectics’ of Human Development , 1981 .

[10]  H. Daniels Rethinking intervention: changing the cultures of schooling , 2006 .

[11]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Pygmalion in the classroom , 1968 .

[12]  Annalisa Sannino,et al.  Sustaining a non-dominant activity in school: Only a utopia? , 2008 .

[13]  M. Douglas How Institutions Think , 1986 .

[14]  P. Sahlberg Finnish Lessons: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? , 2011 .

[15]  Penelope Eckert,et al.  Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School , 1989 .

[16]  Lee Jussim,et al.  Teacher Expectations and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: Knowns and Unknowns, Resolved and Unresolved Controversies , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[17]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[18]  H. Daniels The dangers of corruption in special needs education , 2006 .

[19]  Richard Tabulawa,et al.  Education reform in Botswana: reflections on policy contradictions and paradoxes , 2009 .

[20]  Rachel Joffe Falmagne Sociocultural psychology: The abstract and the concrete , 1995 .

[21]  M. Moulton,et al.  Gifted & talented: Exploring the positive and negative aspects of labeling , 1998 .

[22]  Gegel G.V.Ph. Who thinks abstractly , 2006 .

[23]  P. Eckert Adolescent social categories—Information and science learning. , 1990 .

[24]  E. Ilyenkov Our Schools Must Teach How to Think! , 2007 .

[25]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[26]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Putting Vygotsky to Work: The Change Laboratory as an Application of Double Stimulation , 2007 .

[27]  Diane Ravitch,et al.  The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education , 2010 .