Evaluating Animated Characters: Facial Motion Magnitude Influences Personality Perceptions

Animated characters are expected to fulfill a variety of social roles across different domains. To be successful and effective, these characters must display a wide range of personalities. Designers and animators create characters with appropriate personalities by using their intuition and artistic expertise. Our goal is to provide evidence-based principles for creating social characters. In this article, we describe the results of two experiments that show how exaggerated and damped facial motion magnitude influence impressions of cartoon and more realistic animated characters. In our first experiment, participants watched animated characters that varied in rendering style and facial motion magnitude. The participants then rated the different animated characters on extroversion, warmth, and competence, which are social traits that are relevant for characters used in entertainment, therapy, and education. We found that facial motion magnitude affected these social traits in cartoon and realistic characters differently. Facial motion magnitude affected ratings of cartoon characters’ extroversion and competence more than their warmth. In contrast, facial motion magnitude affected ratings of realistic characters’ extroversion but not their competence nor warmth. We ran a second experiment to extend the results of the first. In the second experiment, we added emotional valence as a variable. We also asked participants to rate the characters on more specific aspects of warmth, such as respectfulness, calmness, and attentiveness. Although the characters’ emotional valence did not affect ratings, we found that facial motion magnitude influenced ratings of the characters’ respectfulness and calmness but not attentiveness. These findings provide a basis for how animators can fine-tune facial motion to control perceptions of animated characters’ personalities.

[1]  C. Izard Innate and universal facial expressions: evidence from developmental and cross-cultural research. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[3]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Assessing naturalness and emotional intensity: a perceptual study of animated facial motion , 2014, SAP.

[4]  P. Gallaher Individual differences in nonverbal behavior : dimensions of style , 1992 .

[5]  R. Gifford Mapping Nonverbal Behavior on the Interpersonal Circle , 1991 .

[6]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[7]  Bartholomäus Wissmath,et al.  How Socially Relevant Visual Characteristics of Avatars Influence Impression Formation , 2010, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[8]  P. Ekman,et al.  Relative importance of face, body, and speech in judgments of personality and affect. , 1980 .

[9]  Ronald E. Riggio,et al.  Emotional Expressiveness, Extraversion, and Neuroticism: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[10]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Social Psychological Face Perception: Why Appearance Matters. , 2008, Social and personality psychology compass.

[11]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[12]  Suzanne Young,et al.  Profiles of Effective College and University Teachers , 1999 .

[13]  Lee Sproull,et al.  When the Interface Is a Face , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  Gray Hodgkinson The seduction of realism , 2009, SIGGRAPH ASIA '09.

[15]  Jeffrey R. Spies,et al.  Effects of damping head movement and facial expression in dyadic conversation using real–time facial expression tracking and synthesized avatars , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  C Anderson,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Who Attains Social Status ? Effects of Personality and Physical Attractiveness in Social Groups , 2004 .

[17]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  A. Todorov,et al.  The functional basis of face evaluation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Perceptual effects of damped and exaggerated facial motion in animated characters , 2013, 2013 10th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG).

[20]  James R. Lewis,et al.  Pairs of Latin Squares to Counterbalance Sequential Effects and Pairing of Conditions and Stimuli , 1989 .

[21]  Philip A. Vernon,et al.  Replicating the movement time–extraversion link…with a little help from IQ , 2000 .

[22]  Janine Willis,et al.  First Impressions , 2006, Psychological science.

[23]  C. Doucet,et al.  Movement time differentiates extraverts from introverts , 1997 .

[24]  Timothy R. Jordan,et al.  The recognition of mental states from dynamic and static facial expressions , 2009 .

[25]  J. Cohn,et al.  Deciphering the Enigmatic Face , 2005, Psychological science.

[26]  P. Ekman,et al.  Smiles when lying. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Joanna Bryson,et al.  The Significance of Textures for Affective Interfaces , 2005, IVA.

[28]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  View-based active appearance models , 2000, Proceedings Fourth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (Cat. No. PR00580).

[29]  Ronald E. Riggio,et al.  Nonverbal Skill, Personal Charisma, and Initial Attraction , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[30]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Appearance Models , 1998, ECCV.

[31]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[32]  G. Fink,et al.  Being with virtual others: Neural correlates of social interaction , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  U. Hess,et al.  The Intensity of Emotional Facial Expressions and Decoding Accuracy , 1997 .

[34]  Radoslaw Niewiadomski,et al.  Warmth, Competence, Believability and Virtual Agents , 2010, IVA.

[35]  John Lasseter,et al.  Principles of traditional animation applied to 3D computer animation , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[36]  J. M. Digman PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[37]  J. Cassell,et al.  Nudge nudge wink wink: elements of face-to-face conversation for embodied conversational agents , 2001 .

[38]  Richard L. Moreland,et al.  Exposure effects in person perception: Familiarity, similarity, and attraction , 1982 .

[39]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Computer Animated Movement and Person Perception: Methodological Advances in Nonverbal Behavior Research , 2001 .

[40]  Simon Baker,et al.  Active Appearance Models Revisited , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[41]  Yoshifumi Kitamura,et al.  Effects of avatar's blinking animation on person impressions , 2008, Graphics Interface.

[42]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Render me real? , 2012, ACM Trans. Graph..

[43]  Judith S. Donath,et al.  Mediated Faces , 2001, Cognitive Technology.

[44]  S. Ackerman,et al.  A review of therapist characteristics and techniques positively impacting the therapeutic alliance. , 2003, Clinical psychology review.

[45]  Jeffrey R. Spies,et al.  Mapping and Manipulating Facial Expression , 2009, Language and speech.

[46]  F. Thomas,et al.  Disney Animation: The Illusion of Life , 1981 .

[47]  R. Stelmack,et al.  Personality, Reaction Time, and Event-Related Potentials , 1993 .