Short-term adaptation of auditory receptive fields to dynamic stimuli.

Short-term adaptation and recovery from adaptation have a strong impact on the processing of dynamic stimuli. Adaptive effects on neuronal activity have been studied most commonly for changes in first-order statistics of stimuli such as stepwise increments or decrements in stimulus amplitude. However, changes in higher moment statistics, such as the variance of the amplitude distribution in visual stimuli, also can invoke pronounced adaptation behavior. We demonstrate here that neurons in the inferior colliculus (ICC) of the cat show adaptation to dynamic auditory stimuli that differ in the variance of their modulation depth distribution. In addition, it is shown that neurons show adaptation to other higher moment statistics (e.g., kurtosis) of the modulation envelope. The time course of adaptation is specific for the altered stimulus property and the direction of parameter change. The use of dynamic stimuli allows an estimate of the effects of the adaptation on the temporal response properties of the neurons. We demonstrate that temporal receptive fields of neurons undergo change during the course of adaptation. We show that adaptation to variance in the ICC has many similarities to that in the retina and suggest that adaptation to variance is a general property of sensory systems that allows them to effectively deal with a nonstationary environment.

[1]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  J. Eggermont,et al.  Cochlear Adaptation In Guinea Pigs , 1973 .

[3]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Analysis of Physiological Systems , 1978, Computers in Biology and Medicine.

[4]  P. Dallos,et al.  Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  R L Smith,et al.  Adaptation, saturation, and physiological masking in single auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Robert L. Smith,et al.  Operating range and maximum response of single auditory nerve fibers , 1980, Brain Research.

[7]  Dynamic Response of Single Auditory-Nerve Fibers: Some Effects of Intensity and Time , 1980 .

[8]  Time constants of acoustic adaptation. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  P J Abbas,et al.  AP responses in forward-masking paradigms and their relationship to responses of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Solomon W. Golomb,et al.  Shift Register Sequences , 1981 .

[11]  Adrian Rees,et al.  Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat to AM and FM tones , 1983, Hearing Research.

[12]  D. Oliver,et al.  The central nucleus of the inferior colliculus in the cat , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  L. A. Westerman,et al.  Rapid and short-term adaptation in auditory nerve responses , 1984, Hearing Research.

[14]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Characteristics of tone-pip response patterns in relationship to spontaneous rate in cat auditory nerve fibers , 1985, Hearing Research.

[15]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  C E Schreiner,et al.  Time course of adaptation and recovery from adaptation in the cat auditory-nerve neurophonic. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  C E Schreiner,et al.  Adaptation and recovery from adaptation in single fiber responses of the cat auditory nerve. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Michael S. Lewicki,et al.  Bayesian Modeling and Classification of Neural Signals , 1993, Neural Computation.

[19]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale , 1997, Nature.

[20]  Christoph E. Schreiner,et al.  Perturbative M-Sequences for Auditory Systems Identification , 1997, NIPS.

[21]  L. Abbott,et al.  Synaptic Depression and Cortical Gain Control , 1997, Science.

[22]  P. Finlayson,et al.  Short-term adaptation of excitation and inhibition shapes binaural processing. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[23]  Anthony M. Zador,et al.  Asymmetric Dynamics in Optimal Variance Adaptation , 1998, Neural Computation.

[24]  M. Semple,et al.  Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  M. Semple,et al.  Effects of auditory stimulus context on the representation of frequency in the gerbil inferior colliculus. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Nonlinear Spectrotemporal Sound Analysis by Neurons in the Auditory Midbrain , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[28]  D. Moore Cortical neurons signal sound novelty , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  I. Nelken,et al.  Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Christoph E. Schreiner,et al.  Functional topography of cat primary auditory cortex: representation of tone intensity , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Short-term adaptation and incremental responses of single auditory-nerve fibers , 1975, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Functional topography of cat primary auditory cortex: responses to frequency-modulated sweeps , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.