A simplified framework for probabilistic earthquake loss estimation

Earthquake loss estimation procedures exhibit aleatory and epistemic uncertainty imbedded in their various components; i.e. seismic hazard, structural fragility, and inventory data. Since these uncertainties significantly affect decision-making, they have to be considered in loss estimation to inform decision- and policymakers and to ensure a balanced view of the various threats to which society may be subjected. This paper reviews the uncertainties that affect earthquake loss estimation and proposes a simple framework for probabilistic uncertainty assessment suitable for use after obtaining impact results from existing software, such as HAZUS-MH. To avoid the extensive calculations required for Monte Carlo simulation-based approaches, this study develops an approximate method for uncertainty propagation based on modifying the quantile arithmetic methodology, which allows for acceptable uncertainty estimates with limited computational effort. A verification example shows that the results by the approximation approach are in good agreement with the equivalent Monte Carlo simulation outcome. Finally, the paper demonstrates the proposed procedure for probabilistic loss assessment through a comparison with HAZUS-MH results. It is confirmed that the proposed procedure consistently gives reasonable estimates.

[1]  Paul R. Kleindorfer,et al.  THE IMPACT OF UNCERTAINTY IN MANAGING SEISMIC RISK: THE CASE OF EARTHQUAKE FREQUENCY AND STRUCTURAL VULNERABILITY , 1999 .

[2]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Real-Time Loss Estimation as an Emergency Response Decision Support System: The Early Post-Earthquake Damage Assessment Tool (EPEDAT) , 1997 .

[3]  Alex H. Barbat,et al.  Damage Scenarios Simulation for Seismic Risk Assessment in Urban Zones , 1996 .

[4]  M. K. Ravindra,et al.  Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies , 1984 .

[5]  M. Ragheb,et al.  Quantile arithmetic methodology for uncertainty propagation in fault trees , 1986 .

[6]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  The impact of epistemic uncertainty on an earthquake loss model , 2005 .

[7]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[8]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Method for Probabilistic Evaluation of Seismic Structural Damage , 1996 .

[9]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Earthquake risk assessment of building structures , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Ali Touran,et al.  Monte Carlo Technique with Correlated Random Variables , 1992 .

[11]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data , 2003 .

[12]  Means Means assemblies cost data , 1985 .

[13]  C. V. Anderson,et al.  The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) , 2002 .

[14]  A. Touran Probabilistic Cost Estimating with Subjective Correlations , 1993 .

[15]  James L. Beck,et al.  Uncertainty Propagation and Feature Selection for Loss Estimation in Performance-based Earthquake Engineering , 2004 .

[16]  L. Reiter Earthquake Hazard Analysis: Issues and Insights , 1991 .

[17]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation , 2008 .

[18]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Development of fragility curves of bridges retrofitted by column jacketing , 2004 .

[19]  H Y Kim,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FRAGILITY CURVES , 2000 .

[20]  Eldon Hansen,et al.  Topics in Interval Analysis , 1969 .

[21]  Daniel Straub,et al.  Improved seismic fragility modeling from empirical data , 2008 .

[22]  Walter W. Hays,et al.  Procedures for estimating earthquake ground motions , 1980 .

[23]  Marco Wyss,et al.  A new Tool for Estimating Losses due to Earthquakes: QUAKELOSS2 , 2007 .

[24]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Bayesian Updating of Fragilities with Application to RC Frames , 1998 .

[25]  Chris H. Cramer,et al.  A seismic hazard uncertainty analysis for the New Madrid seismic zone , 2001 .