Web-based child pornography: The global impact of deterrence efforts and its consumption on mobile platforms.

Our study is the first to look at mobile device use for child sexual exploitation material (CSEM) consumption, and at the global impact of deterrence efforts by search providers. We used data from Google, Bing, and Yandex to assess how web searches for CSEM are being conducted, both at present and historically. Our findings show that the blocking efforts by Google and Microsoft have resulted in a 67% drop in the past year in web-based searches for CSEM. Additionally, our findings show that mobile devices are a substantial platform for web-based consumption of CSEM, with tablets and smartphones representing 32% of all queries associated with CSEM conducted on Bing. Further, our findings show that a major search engine not located in the United States, Yandex, did not undertake blocking efforts similar to those implemented by Google and Microsoft and has seen no commensurate drop in CSEM searches and continues to profit from ad revenue on these queries. While the efforts by Google and Microsoft have had a deterrence effect in the United States, searchers from Russia and other locations where child pornography possession is not criminalized have continued to use these services. Additionally, the same lax enforcement environment has allowed searchers from the United States to utilize Yandex with little fear of detection or referral to United States law enforcement from the Russian authorities.

[1]  P. Jenkins..  Beyond Tolerance: Child Pornography on the Internet , 2001 .

[2]  Janis Wolak,et al.  Sexting: A typology. , 2011 .

[3]  Richard P. Mislan,et al.  All Bot Net: A Need for Smartphone P2P Awareness , 2011, ICDF2C.

[4]  E. Quayle,et al.  Child Pornography: An Internet Crime , 2003 .

[5]  M. McManus,et al.  Trends of indecent images of children and child sexual offences between 2005/2006 and 2012/2013 within the United Kingdom , 2014 .

[6]  E. Quayle,et al.  child pornography and the internet: perpetuating a cycle of abuse , 2002 .

[7]  J. Wolak,et al.  Prevalence and Characteristics of Youth Sexting: A National Study , 2012, Pediatrics.

[8]  Julia von Weiler,et al.  Care and treatment of child victims of child pornographic exploitation (CPE) in Germany , 2010 .

[9]  R. Wortley,et al.  Internet Child Pornography: Causes, Investigation, and Prevention , 2012 .

[10]  Peter M. Briggs,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Internet-Initiated Sexual Offenses and the Chat Room Sex Offender: Has the Internet Enabled a New Typology of Sex Offender? , 2011, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[11]  Chad M. S. Steel.  Web-Based Child Pornography: Quantification and Qualification of Demand , 2009, Int. J. Digit. Crime Forensics.

[12]  Chad M. S. Steel.  Child pornography in peer-to-peer networks. , 2009, Child abuse & neglect.

[13]  Kathryn C. Seigfried-Spellar,et al.  Using Internet Artifacts to Profile a Child Pornography Suspect , 2014, J. Digit. Forensics Secur. Law.

[14]  Brian Neil Levine,et al.  Measuring a year of child pornography trafficking by U.S. computers on a peer-to-peer network. , 2014, Child abuse & neglect.

[15]  David Bennett,et al.  The Challenges Facing Computer Forensics Investigators in Obtaining Information from Mobile Devices for Use in Criminal Investigations , 2012, Inf. Secur. J. A Glob. Perspect..