Testing Models: A Key Aspect to Promote Teaching Activities Related to Models and Modelling in Biology Lessons?

This study investigated biology teachers’ (N = 148) understanding of models and modelling (MoMo), their model-related teaching activities and relations between the two. A framework which distinguishes five aspects of MoMo in science (nature of models, multiple models, purpose of models, testing models and changing models) served as a theoretical background. Teachers’ understanding of MoMo was assessed using constructed-response items which were analysed qualitatively based on a coding scheme. The biology teachers mainly expressed a limited understanding of models as copies or idealised depictions used to show or to explain something. Model-related teaching activities were assessed through rating-scale items. The findings propose that models are primarily generated in biology lessons to show or to explain something but are rarely contrasted with other models, evaluated and modified. Significant correlations between teachers’ understanding of the aspect testing models and their intensity of model-related teaching activities were found. This suggests that the aspect testing models is a key aspect of promoting teaching activities related to MoMo in biology lessons. The findings are discussed with respect to relevant literature about MoMo in science education and educational implications are provided.

[1]  Jan H. van Driel,et al.  Teachers' Knowledge of Models and Modelling in Science. , 1999 .

[2]  Rosária Justi,et al.  Teachers' views on the nature of models , 2003 .

[3]  Italo Testa,et al.  Improving Prospective Teachers’ Knowledge about Scientific Models and Modelling: Design and evaluation of a teacher education intervention , 2010 .

[4]  Jennifer J. Richler,et al.  Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  J. Baumert,et al.  Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften , 2006 .

[6]  Cynthia Passmore,et al.  The Strategies of Modeling in Biology Education , 2013 .

[7]  Shi-Eun Lee,et al.  Exploring Secondary Students’ Epistemological Features Depending on the Evaluation Levels of the Group Model on Blood Circulation , 2014 .

[8]  R. Krall,et al.  Energy Flow through an Ecosystem: Conceptions of In-service Elementary and Middle School Teachers , 2012 .

[9]  Rosária Justi,et al.  The development of science teachers' knowledge on models and modelling: promoting, characterizing, and understanding the process , 2005 .

[10]  Dirk Ifenthaler,et al.  Model-based reasoning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Rosária Justi,et al.  Science teachers' knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science , 2002 .

[12]  Dirk Krüger,et al.  Assessing Students' Understandings of Biological Models and their Use in Science to Evaluate a Theoretical Framework , 2014 .

[13]  Jing-Wen Lin.  ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ KNOWLEDGE OF MODEL FUNCTIONS AND MODELING PROCESSES: A COMPARISON OF SCIENCE AND NON-SCIENCE MAJORS , 2014 .

[14]  Ngss Lead States.  Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[15]  D. Krüger,et al.  Students’ understanding of the purpose of models in different biological contexts. , 2013 .

[16]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[17]  Phil Seok Oh,et al.  What Teachers of Science Need to Know about Models: An overview , 2011 .

[18]  Nico Verloop,et al.  Experienced teachers' knowledge of teaching and learning of models and modelling in science education , 2002 .

[19]  Samia Khan,et al.  What’s Missing in Model-Based Teaching , 2011 .

[20]  Moritz Krell,et al.  Analyzing Students’ Understanding of Models and Modeling Referring to the Disciplines Biology, Chemistry, and Physics , 2015 .