Storability in Cold Temperatures Can Be Evaluated Based on Changes in Fruit Quality in Apple Genotypes Under Shelf Life Conditions

To compare changes in fruit quality during cold storage with those during shelf lifeconditions,fleshfirmnessandtitratableacidity(TA)weremeasuredduringstoragein 20 apple (Malus ·domestica Borkh.) cultivars. Fruit of each cultivar were divided into two groups and stored in chambers controlled at 20 ± 2 8C and 85 ± 5% relative humidity (RH) (shelf life conditions) or 0.5 ± 0.3 8C and 95 ± 5% RH (cold storage). Five of the stored fruit were removed for measurements at 5- or 10-d intervals for 40 d and at 1-month intervals until 10 months after harvest at 20 8C and 0.5 8C, respectively. Data for firmness and TA were subjected to a linear regression and a nonlinear regression, respectively. Moreover, to determine the advantages of 0.5 8C storage over 20 8C storage for retaining firmness and TA, the effect of storage type on extending the storage period was introduced as a parameter. The estimate of the effect of storage type showed that firmness and TA could be retained 8.9 and 3.7 times, respectively, longer at 0.5 8C than 20 8C, independently of the cultivar. Therefore, firmness and TA after cold storage could be predicted by the change in firmness and TA during shelf life conditions. Moreover, cultivar differences regarding quality change under cold storage could be determined in a short period after harvest because the cultivar differences under shelf life conditions were detected within 1 month after harvest.

[1]  Michael L. Parker,et al.  Use of Maturity Indices for Predicting Poststorage Firmness of `Fuji' Apples , 1997 .

[2]  Maarten Hertog,et al.  Temperature induces differential softening responses in apple cultivars , 2001 .

[3]  M. Hertog,et al.  Harvest date and fruit size affect postharvest softening of apple fruit , 2002 .

[4]  M. Hertog,et al.  Temperature and ethylene affect induction of rapid softening in ‘Granny Smith’ and ‘Pacific Rose™’ apple cultivars , 2002 .

[5]  J. Soejima,et al.  Optimal sampling strategies for evaluating fruit softening after harvest in apple breeding , 2005, Euphytica.

[6]  S. Blankenship,et al.  1-Methylcyclopropene Inhibits Apple Ripening , 1999 .

[7]  W. Bramlage,et al.  Predicting Poststorage Disorders of ‘Cox's Orange Pippin’ and ‘Bramley's Seedling’ Apples by Regression Equations , 1986, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[8]  S. Drake.  Short-term Controlled Atmosphere Storage Improved Quality of Several Apple Cultivars , 1993 .

[9]  M. Ridout,et al.  Prediction of storage quality of ‘Cox’s Orange Pippin’ apples from nutritional and meteorological data using multiple regression models selected by cross validation , 1998 .

[10]  R. Beaudry,et al.  Harvest Date Effects on Maturity, Quality, and Storage Disorders of 'Honeycrisp' Apples , 2005 .

[11]  R. Beaudry,et al.  Location and Temperature Effects on Soft Scald in 'Honeycrisp∑ Apples , 2003 .

[12]  E. C. Townsend,et al.  Fruit Characteristics of `York' Apples during Development and after Storage , 2000 .

[13]  G. M. Greene,et al.  Predicting Firmness of `York Imperial' Apples after Long-term Storage , 1993 .

[14]  J. C. Morris,et al.  Predicting Firmness Changes of ‘Rome’ Apples in Refrigerated Storage , 1989, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[15]  Hiroshi Iwanami,et al.  Evaluation of Differences in Softening of Apple Genotypes by Linear Regression , 2004 .