Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements

Abstract. Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction were correlated with measured soil and vegetation parameters. Relationships were studied through between-species and between-site comparisons, using data from 74 roadside plots in 14 different plant communities in The Netherlands forming a wide range. Ellenberg moisture values correlated best with the average lowest moisture contents in summer. Correlations with the annual average groundwater level and the average spring level were also good. Ellenberg N-values appeared to be only weakly correlated with soil parameters, including N-mineralization and available mineral N. Instead, there was a strong relation with biomass production. We therefore endorse Hill & Carey's (1997) suggestion that the term N-values be replaced by ‘productivity values'. For soil reaction, many species values appeared to need regional adjustment. The relationship with soil pH was unsatisfactory; mean indicator values were similar for all sites at pH > 4.75 because of wide species tolerances for intermediate pH levels. Site mean reaction values correlated best (r up to 0.92) with the total amount of calcium (exchangeable Ca2+ plus Ca from carbonates). It is therefore suggested that reaction values are better referred to as ‘calcium values'. Using abundance values as weights when calculating mean indicator values generally improved the results, but, over the wide range of conditions studied, differences were small. Indicator values for bryophytes appeared well in line with those for vascular plants. It was noted that the frequency distributions of indicator values are quite uneven. This creates a tendency for site mean values to converge to the value most common in the regional species pool. Although the effect on overall correlations is small, relationships tended to be less linear. Uneven distributions also cause the site mean indicator values at which species have their optimum to deviate from the actual Ellenberg values of these species. Suggestions for improvements are made. It is concluded that the Ellenberg indicator system provides a very valuable tool for habitat calibration, provided the appropriate parameters are considered.

[1]  M. Pärtel,et al.  Alvar grasslands in Estonia: variation in species composition and community structure , 1999 .

[2]  M. Diekmann,et al.  Prediction of occurrence of vascular plants in deciduous forests of South Sweden by means of Ellenberg indicator values , 1998 .

[3]  H. Olff,et al.  Do intrinsically dominant and subordinate species exist? A test statistic for field data , 1998 .

[4]  M. Hill,et al.  Prediction of yield in the Rothamsted Park Grass Experiment by Ellenberg indicator values , 1997 .

[5]  I. White,et al.  Using Ellenberg indicator values to assess soil quality in British forests from ground vegetation : a pilot study , 1997 .

[6]  Richard Law,et al.  PERMANENCE AND THE ASSEMBLY OF ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 1996 .

[7]  M. Pärtel,et al.  The species pool and its relation to species richness : evidence from Estonian plant communities , 1996 .

[8]  I. Novozamsky,et al.  State of the art and future developments in soil analysis for bioavailability assessment , 1996 .

[9]  M. Diekmann.  Use and improvement of Ellenberg's indicator values in deciduous forests of the Boreo-nemoral zone in Sweden , 1995 .

[10]  C. Braak,et al.  Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology: Regression , 1995 .

[11]  W. Slooff,et al.  Ecological standards for eutrophication and desiccation: Perspectives for a risk assessment , 1994 .

[12]  A. Thimonier,et al.  Simultaneous eutrophication and acidification of a forest ecosystem in North-East France. , 1994, The New phytologist.

[13]  S. Pignatti,et al.  Ellenbergs Zeigerwerte zur ökologischen Bewertung der archäologischen Zonen in Rom , 1993 .

[14]  W. Seidling,et al.  Zusammenhänge zwischen Reaktions-Zeigerwerten und bodenchemischen Parametern am Beispiel von Waldbodenvegetation , 1993 .

[15]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Ellenberg numbers revisited , 1993 .

[16]  Eddy van der Maarei.  Relations between sociological-ecological species groups and Ellenberg indicator values , 1993 .

[17]  J. Mountford,et al.  Water Regime Requirements of British Wetland Vegetation: Using the Moisture Classification of Ellenberg and Londo , 1993 .

[18]  H. Möller.  Zur Verwendung des Medians bei Zeigerwertberechnungen nach ELLENBERG , 1992 .

[19]  C. Weston,et al.  In situ studies of nitrogen mineralization and uptake in forest soils; some comments on methodology , 1989 .

[20]  C. Braak,et al.  Ecological amplitudes of plant species and the internal consistency of Ellenberg’s indicator values for moisture , 1987 .

[21]  R. J. Raison,et al.  Methodology for studying fluxes of soil mineral-N in situ , 1987 .

[22]  J. Bakker.  Restoration of species-rich grassland after a period of fertilizer application , 1987 .

[23]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  Weighted averaging of species indicator values: Its efficiency in environmental calibration , 1986 .

[24]  E. Schulze,et al.  Die Standortamplitude der Großen Brennessel (Urtica dioica L.)—eine Auswertung vegetationskundlicher Aufnahmen auf der Grundlage der Ellenbergschen Zeigerwerte1)1) Herrn Prof. Dr. H. Meusel zum 75. Geburtstag gewidmet. , 1985 .

[25]  S. Persson.  Ecological Indicator Values as an Aid in the Interpretation of Ordination Diagrams , 1981 .

[26]  I. H. Rorison,et al.  Seasonal Differences in the Availability of Nutrients Down a Podzolic Profile , 1975 .

[27]  M. Hill.  Diversity and Evenness: A Unifying Notation and Its Consequences , 1973 .

[28]  R. S. Clymo.  An Experimental Approach to Part of the Calcicole Problem , 1962 .

[29]  R. K. Schofield,et al.  Measurement of soil pH , 1955 .

[30]  B. Steele.  Soil pH and Base Status as Factors in the Distribution of Calcicoles , 1955 .

[31]  E. Salisbury.  The Significance of the Calcicolous Habit , 1920 .