Chemicals and energy co-generation from direct hydrocarbons/oxygen proton exchange membrane fuel cell

Abstract A proton exchange membrane fuel cell for chemicals and energy co-generation was set up with hydrocarbons ethane, propane and butane as fuels, and the electrochemical performance of the cell was studied by using linear potential sweep, alternating current impedance and gas chromatography. The cell performance can be improved to a great extent by increasing the platinum load in the catalyst, by treating the membrane with phosphoric acid and by elevating temperature. The improvement of cell performance by the increase of platinum load is ascribed to the increase of reaction sites for hydrocarbon oxidation, that by phosphoric acid treatment to the increase of proton conductivity in Nafion membrane, and that by elevating temperature to the improvement in thermodynamic as well as kinetic aspects. Only a small fraction of the hydrocarbon is converted to carbon dioxide in this cell during its power generation. The current efficiency is 5% for the conversion of ethane to carbon dioxide in the ethane/oxygen fuel cell with 20% carbon-supported platinum as catalyst and phosphoric acid-treated membrane as proton exchange membrane at 0.2 V, 80 °C and ambient pressure. The reaction activity of hydrocarbons at the anode is in the order of propane, butane and ethane. The possible chemicals produced from the cell were hydrocarbons with more than six carbons, which are inactive at the anode under cell conditions.

[1]  W. Preidel,et al.  Status of the development of a direct methanol fuel cell , 1999 .

[2]  Raymond J. Gorte,et al.  Direct oxidation of hydrocarbons in a solid-oxide fuel cell , 2000, Nature.

[3]  E. Gileadi,et al.  Anodic oxidation of saturated hydrocarbons. Mechanistic study , 1969 .

[4]  H. Y. Chen,et al.  Catalytic oxidation of methanol on molybdate-modified platinum electrode in sulfuric acid solution , 2002 .

[5]  A. York,et al.  Selective oxidation of propene using an electrochemical membrane reactor with CeO2-based solid electrolyte , 1996 .

[6]  Gunter Sattler,et al.  Fuel cells going on-board , 2000 .

[7]  G. Pratt,et al.  Wall-less reactor studies. Part 1.—Ethane pyrolysis , 1979 .

[8]  E. Gileadi.  Electrosorption of uncharged molecules on solid electrodes , 1966 .

[9]  C. Kemball,et al.  The catalytic oxidation of olefins on metal films , 1963 .

[10]  Shigeo Goto,et al.  Fuel cell type reactor for Chemicals-energy co-generation , 1999 .

[11]  H. Iwahara,et al.  High temperature-type proton conductive solid oxide fuel cells using various fuels , 1986 .

[12]  S. Brummer,et al.  The Adsorption and Oxidation of Hydrocarbons on Noble Metal Electrodes. I. Propane Adsorption on Smooth Platinum Electrodes , 1965 .

[13]  Seungdoo Park,et al.  Direct Oxidation of Hydrocarbons in a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell: I. Methane Oxidation , 1999 .

[14]  Angelika Heinzel,et al.  A review of the state-of-the-art of the methanol crossover in direct methanol fuel cells , 1999 .

[15]  David A. J. Rand,et al.  Direct methanol–air fuel cells for road transportation , 1999 .

[16]  M. Hatano,et al.  The Selective Oxidation of Toluene to Benzaldehyde Applying a Fuel Cell System in the Gas Phase , 1991 .

[17]  J. Giner.  The anodic oxidation of methanol and formic acid and the reductive. Adsorption of CO2 , 1964 .

[18]  E. Oldfield,et al.  An NMR investigation of CO tolerance in a Pt/Ru fuel cell catalyst. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.