Performance comparison of point feature detectors and descriptors for visual navigation on Android platform

Consumer electronics mobile devices, such like smartphones and tablets, are quickly growing in computing power and become equipped with advanced sensors. This makes a modern mobile device a viable platform for many computation-intensive, real-time applications. In this paper we present a study on the performance and robustness of point features detection and description in images acquired by a mobile device in the context of visual navigation. This is an important step towards infrastructure-less indoor self-localization and user guidance using only a smartphone or tablet. We rigorously evaluate the performance of several interest point detector and descriptor pairs on three different Android devices, using image sequences from publicly available robotics-related data sets, as well as our own data set obtained using a smartphone.

[1]  Christopher G. Harris,et al.  A Combined Corner and Edge Detector , 1988, Alvey Vision Conference.

[2]  Marek Kraft,et al.  The registration system for the evaluation of indoor visual slam and odometry algorithms , 2013 .

[3]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features , 2006, ECCV.

[4]  Xin Yang,et al.  LDB: An ultra-fast feature for scalable Augmented Reality on mobile devices , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR).

[5]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Sub-meter indoor localization in unmodified environments with inexpensive sensors , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[6]  João M. P. Cardoso,et al.  An Analysis of Navigation Algorithms for Smartphones Using J2ME , 2009, MOBILWARE.

[7]  Marek Kraft,et al.  Comparative assessment of point feature detectors in the context of robot navigation , 2013 .

[8]  Piotr Skrzypczynski,et al.  Simultaneous localization and mapping: A feature-based probabilistic approach , 2009, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci..

[9]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  BRISK: Binary Robust invariant scalable keypoints , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[10]  Niko Sünderhauf,et al.  COMPARING SEVERAL IMPLEMENTATIONS OF TWO RECENTLY PUBLISHED FEATURE DETECTORS , 2007 .

[11]  Tom Drummond,et al.  Machine Learning for High-Speed Corner Detection , 2006, ECCV.

[12]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  A benchmark for the evaluation of RGB-D SLAM systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Yewguan Soo,et al.  Real-time video processing using native programming on Android platform , 2012, 2012 IEEE 8th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and its Applications.

[14]  Liviu Iftode,et al.  Indoor Localization Using Camera Phones , 2006, Seventh IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems & Applications (WMCSA'06 Supplement).

[15]  Vincent Lepetit,et al.  BRIEF: Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features , 2010, ECCV.

[16]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Pose tracking from natural features on mobile phones , 2008, 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[17]  Carlo Tomasi,et al.  Good features to track , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[18]  Pierre Vandergheynst,et al.  FREAK: Fast Retina Keypoint , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[19]  Kurt Konolige,et al.  CenSurE: Center Surround Extremas for Realtime Feature Detection and Matching , 2008, ECCV.

[20]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[21]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  A Performance Evaluation of Local Descriptors , 2005, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[22]  F. Fraundorfer,et al.  Visual Odometry : Part II: Matching, Robustness, Optimization, and Applications , 2012, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[23]  Olivier Stasse,et al.  MonoSLAM: Real-Time Single Camera SLAM , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[24]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[25]  Ethan Rublee,et al.  ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.