Influence of language-specific input on spatial cognition: Categories of containment

This study examines whether language-specific input influences children's nonlinguistic spatial cognition as they acquire their first language. Recent research on infant cognition has shown that preverbal infants can make a distinction between tight-fit and loose-fit containment relations. This distinction is systematically made in Korean (kkita‘fit tightly’), but not in English (in). Using a preferential-looking method, this study tested sensitivity to the distinction in English and Korean learners at different ages: English learners were tested at 18, 24, 29 and 36 months, and Korean learners at 29 and 36 months of age. Results showed that while English learners weaken their sensitivity to the distinction by 29 months of age, Korean learners maintain high sensitivity to the distinction throughout the age periods tested. Language surveys of the English learners indicate that weakening of the sensitivity occurs as the children use the relevant spatial terms and increase their vocabulary level.

[1]  J. Mandler,et al.  Understanding spatial relations: Flexible infants, lexical adults , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Linda B Smith,et al.  Known and novel noun extensions: attention at two levels of abstraction. , 2003, Child development.

[3]  S. Levinson,et al.  Returning the tables: language affects spatial reasoning , 2002, Cognition.

[4]  L. Gleitman,et al.  Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning , 2002, Cognition.

[5]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  The Origins of Grammar: Evidence from Early Language Comprehension , 1999 .

[6]  J. Mandler,et al.  Early Sensitivity to Language-Specific Spatial Categories in English and Korean , 1999 .

[7]  David P. Wilkins,et al.  Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization , 1998 .

[8]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Effects of language experience on speech perception: American and Japanese infants’ perception of /ra/ and /la/ , 1997 .

[9]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Early acquisition of verbs in Korean: a cross-linguistic study , 1995, Journal of Child Language.

[10]  Gundeep Behl‐Chadha,et al.  Infant categorization of left-right spatial relations , 1995 .

[11]  R. Baillargeon.  How Do Infants Learn About the Physical World? , 1994 .

[12]  P C Quinn,et al.  The categorization of above and below spatial relations by young infants. , 1994, Child development.

[13]  J. Lucy,et al.  Grammatical categories and cognition: References , 1992 .

[14]  M. Bowerman,et al.  Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns , 1991, Cognition.

[15]  S. Levinson,et al.  Rethinking Linguistic Relativity , 1991, Current Anthropology.

[16]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Children use syntax to learn verb meanings , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[17]  Alison Gopnik,et al.  Relations between Semantic and Cognitive Development in the One-Word Stage: The Specificity Hypothesis. , 1986 .

[18]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Semantics and syntax of motion , 1975 .

[19]  P. Kay,et al.  Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution , 1973 .

[20]  F. J. Langdon,et al.  The Child's Conception of Space , 1967 .

[21]  B. L. Whorf.  Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf , 1956 .

[22]  J. Piaget.  The construction of reality in the child , 1954 .

[23]  L. Frank.  The Society for Research in Child Development , 1935 .

[24]  Marcus Kracht,et al.  Language and Space , 2008 .

[25]  Paul C Quinn,et al.  Development of an abstract category representation for the spatial relation between in 6- to 10-month-old infants. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[26]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Conceptual development in infancy: The case of containment , 2002 .

[27]  Janet F. Werker,et al.  Cross-Language Speech Perception : Initial Capabilities and Developmental Change , 2001 .

[28]  Seungjin Choi,et al.  Shaping meanings for language: universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semanti , 2001 .

[29]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  Language acquisition and conceptual development: Relational concepts in form–function mapping , 2001 .

[30]  D. Muir,et al.  Infant development : the essential readings , 2000 .

[31]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  The emergence of language. , 1999 .

[32]  S. Levinson.  Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Cross-linguistic evidence , 1996 .

[33]  M. Bowerman.  Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective , 1996 .

[34]  Soonja Choi,et al.  Verbs, particles, and spatial semantics: Learning to talk about spatial actions in typologically different languages , 1995 .

[35]  R. Baillargeon.  A model of physical reasoning in infancy , 1995 .

[36]  P. Brown.  The INs and ONs of Tzeltal locative expressions: the semantics of static descriptions of location , 1994 .

[37]  A. Gopnik.  Words and thoughts in infancy: the specificity hypothesis and the development of categorization and naming , 1993 .

[38]  D. Slobin.  Learning To Think For Speaking: Native Language, Cognition, And Rhetorical Style , 1991 .

[39]  L. Talmy.  Lexicalisation patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms , 1985 .

[40]  D. Slobin.  Crosslinguistic Evidence for the Language-making Capacity , 1985 .

[41]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[42]  C. Rovee-Collier,et al.  Advances in infancy research , 1981 .

[43]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[44]  D. Slobin.  Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar , 1973 .

[45]  H. H. Clark.  SPACE, TIME, SEMANTICS, AND THE CHILD , 1973 .

[46]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  Non-linguistic strategies and the acquisition of word meanings , 1973 .

[47]  H. Clark,et al.  In cognitive development and the acquisition of language , 1973 .

[48]  F. Moore.  Cognitive development and the acquisition of language , 1973 .

[49]  D. Slobin,et al.  Studies of child language development , 1973 .