An efficient model order reduction scheme for dynamic contact in linear elasticity

The paper proposes an approach for the efficient model order reduction of dynamic contact problems in linear elasticity. Instead of the augmented Lagrangian method that is widely used for mechanical contact problems, we prefer here the Linear Complementarity Programming (LCP) method as basic methodology. It has the advantage of resulting in the much smaller dual problem that is associated with the governing variational principle and that turns out to be beneficial for the model order reduction. Since the shape of the contact zone depends strongly on the acting outer forces, the LCP for the Lagrange multipliers has to be solved in each time step. The model order reduction scheme, on the other hand, is applied to the large linear system for the displacements and computed in advance by means of an Arnoldi process. In terms of computational effort the reduction scheme is very appealing because the contact constraints are fully satisfied while the reduction acts only on the displacements. As an extension of our approach, we furthermore take up the idea of the Craig-Bampton method in order to distinguish between interior nodes and the nodes in the contact zone. A careful performance analysis closes the paper.

[1]  Cuixia Li,et al.  A note on the unique solution of linear complementarity problem , 2016 .

[2]  Patrick Kürschner,et al.  Balanced truncation model order reduction in limited time intervals for large systems , 2017, Adv. Comput. Math..

[3]  C. Farhat,et al.  Dimensional reduction of nonlinear finite element dynamic models with finite rotations and energy‐based mesh sampling and weighting for computational efficiency , 2014 .

[4]  D. Rixen A dual Craig-Bampton method for dynamic substructuring , 2004 .

[5]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[6]  Richard W. Cottle,et al.  Linear Complementarity Problem. , 1992 .

[7]  Thomas Wolf,et al.  ℌ2 pseudo-optimality in model order reduction by Krylov subspace methods , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).

[8]  Boris Lohmann,et al.  Ordnungsreduktion mittels Krylov-Unterraummethoden (Order Reduction using Krylov Subspace Methods) , 2004 .

[9]  Tobias Breiten,et al.  Krylov subspace methods for model order reduction of bilinear control systems , 2010, Syst. Control. Lett..

[10]  M. Powell A method for nonlinear constraints in minimization problems , 1969 .

[11]  K. Willcox,et al.  Data-driven operator inference for nonintrusive projection-based model reduction , 2016 .

[12]  René Pinnau,et al.  Model Reduction of Contact Problems in Elasticity: Proper Orthogonal Decomposition for Variational Inequalities , 2014 .

[13]  J. Oden,et al.  Contact problems in elasticity , 1988 .

[14]  Peter Benner,et al.  Model Order Reduction for Linear and Nonlinear Systems: A System-Theoretic Perspective , 2014, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.

[15]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  A note on numerical computation of elastic contact problems , 1975 .

[16]  A. Fischer A special newton-type optimization method , 1992 .

[17]  S. Reese,et al.  POD‐based model reduction with empirical interpolation applied to nonlinear elasticity , 2016 .

[18]  Benjamin Peherstorfer,et al.  Projection-based model reduction: Formulations for physics-based machine learning , 2019, Computers & Fluids.

[19]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Projection‐based model reduction for contact problems , 2015, 1503.01000.

[20]  Z. Bai Krylov subspace techniques for reduced-order modeling of large-scale dynamical systems , 2002 .

[21]  Peter Benner,et al.  Recycling Krylov Subspaces for Solving Linear Systems with Successively Changing Right-hand Sides Arising in Model Reduction , 2011 .

[22]  Imad M. Jaimoukha,et al.  Krylov Subspace Methods for Model Reduction of Quadratic-Bilinear Systems , 2016 .

[23]  A. Cohen,et al.  Model Reduction and Approximation: Theory and Algorithms , 2017 .

[24]  Peter Benner,et al.  Frequency-Limited Balanced Truncation with Low-Rank Approximations , 2016, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[25]  Nathan van de Wouw,et al.  Model Reduction for Nonlinear Systems by Incremental Balanced Truncation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[26]  T. Anderson,et al.  Application to Structures , 2005 .

[27]  B. Lohmann,et al.  Order reduction of large scale second-order systems using Krylov subspace methods , 2006 .

[28]  Danny C. Sorensen,et al.  Discrete Empirical Interpolation for nonlinear model reduction , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[29]  Bernd Simeon Computational Flexible Multibody Dynamics , 2013 .

[30]  Interdisziplinäre Produktentwicklung-Modellbasiertes Systems Engineering , 2019 .

[31]  Khalide Jbilou,et al.  A Computational Global Tangential Krylov Subspace Method for Model Reduction of Large-Scale MIMO Dynamical Systems , 2018, J. Sci. Comput..