Assessment of the effects of pixel loss on image quality in direct digital radiography.

Modern digital radiographic 'flat panel' detectors can exhibit a progressive form of image degradation arising from non-functioning pixels. The effect of these 'dead pixels' on the quantitive image quality measures of modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) is investigated by a simulated degradation of images obtained from an Hologic EPEX system. The effects on the semi-quantitive measures obtained from contrast threshold test objects and resolution gratings are also investigated. Results suggest that the contrast-detail tests often employed in quality assurance measures are not sufficient to reveal the presence of dead pixels until well beyond the recommended replacement point for the flat panel detector. However, measurements of spatial resolution using a line pairs phantom were found to be more sensitive to pixel loss. Measurement of the MTF, NPS and DQE can reveal small changes in image quality with increasing pixel loss, with a distinctive pattern in the trend of the NPS.

[1]  K Faulkner,et al.  The contrast-detail behaviour of a photostimulable phosphor based computed radiography system. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  E. Samei,et al.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. , 1998, Medical physics.

[3]  K Stierstorfer,et al.  Self-normalizing method to measure the detective quantum efficiency of a wide range of x-ray detectors. , 1999, Medical physics.

[4]  E. Samei,et al.  Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems. , 1999, Medical physics.

[5]  C E Ravin,et al.  Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[6]  Werner Jaschke,et al.  Comparison of Low-Contrast Detail Perception on Storage Phosphor Radiographs and Digital Flat Panel Detector Images , 2001, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[7]  J A Seibert,et al.  Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems. , 2001, Medical physics.

[8]  X Liu,et al.  Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems--a contrast-detail phantom study. , 2001, Medical physics.

[9]  N W Marshall.  The practical application of signal detection theory to image quality assessment in x-ray image intensifier-TV fluoroscopy. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  David L Wilson,et al.  Image quality evaluation of flat panel and image intensifier digital magnification in x-ray fluoroscopy. , 2002, Medical physics.

[11]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems. , 2002, Medical physics.

[12]  A. Nitrosi,et al.  On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography. , 2003, Medical physics.