The objective of this research project was to perform a comparative evaluation of several traffic simulation software with the purpose of identifying their suitability for use on NDOT-sponsored projects. The evaluation was done for traffic conditions on freeway segments, freeway ramps and interchanges, and coordinated intersections on a surface street. The software that were evaluated included VISSIM, TSIS/CORSIM, and SYNHRO/SIMTRAFFIC. They were evaluated based on their ability to model different traffic operational conditions, and provide suitable measures of effectiveness. TSIS/CORSIM is the most developed and probably the most popular software. It can simulate most traffic situations, including special cases such as HOV lane operations, incident conditions, ramp metering, and transit operations. The output data has all the major MOEs in disaggregate and aggregate format, both link specific and network wide, such as vehicle-miles, vehicle hours of travel. VISSIM, on the other hand, is a fairly new software program with very frequent upgrades. It is potentially very powerful; allowing the user a lot more flexibility in network coding, input data and simulation of special situations such as roundabouts, interaction with light-rail systems, and intersection and midblock pedestrian crossing situations. However, it requires more effort in network building and setting-up of simulation situations. It also output several data that requires added effort to compile and post-process in order to provide aggregate and network-wide estimates. Of the three software evaluated, SIMTRAFFIC is the user-friendliest, in terms of the ease of coding a network and running the program. The software typically works with the macroscopic model SYNCHRO and this pair of software can be used to quickly evaluate different optimal traffic and network situations.
[1]
Cindy Mystkowski,et al.
Estimating Queue Lengths by Using SIGNAL94, SYNCHRO3, TRANSYT-7F, PASSER II-90, and CORSIM
,
1999
.
[2]
Scott S. Washburn,et al.
Signalized Intersection Delay Estimation: Case Study Comparison of TRANSYT-7F, Synchro and HCS
,
2002
.
[3]
Lei Rao,et al.
Validation of High-Fidelity Traffic Simulation Models
,
2000
.
[4]
Panos D. Prevedouros,et al.
Comparison of INTEGRATION, TSIS/CORSIM, and WATSim in Replicating Volumes and Speeds on Three Small Networks
,
1998
.
[5]
Panos D. Prevedouros,et al.
Simulation of a Large Freeway/Arterial Network with CORSIM, INTEGRATION and WATSim
,
1999
.
[6]
Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.
Evaluation of freeway lane control for incident management
,
1999
.
[7]
Nagui M. Rouphail,et al.
Validation Results for Four Models of Oversaturated Freeway Facilities
,
2000
.
[8]
George F. List,et al.
Beyond the Highway Capacity Manual Framework for Selecting Simulation Models in Traffic Operational Analyses
,
1999
.
[9]
Loren Bloomberg,et al.
Comparison of VISSIM and CORSIM Traffic Simulation Models on a Congested Network
,
2000
.
[10]
Meenakshy Vasudevan,et al.
Field applications of CORSIM: I-40 freeway design evaluation, Oklahoma City, OK
,
1998,
1998 Winter Simulation Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36274).
[11]
Joseph E. Hummer,et al.
Analyzing System Travel Time in Arterial Corridors with Unconventional Designs Using Microscopic Simulation
,
1999
.