Extending Porter’s generic strategies: from three to eight

Porter's generic strategies have been well received in the field of strategic management. However, this does not mean that the generic strategy concept itself is without criticism. Porter himself was not satisfied with his original generic strategies; he therefore introduced three additional strategies, i.e. variety-based, needs-based and access-based strategies. However, the relationship between Porter's original models and the new model is not clear. This paper clarifies this problem and integrates the different models into a new framework of eight strategies, by adding one more criterion, competitive target. The new framework of this paper may look a little complicated, but it is in fact more simplified than the three different models suggested by Porter. The real benefit of this new model is that it can explain the real-world cases better than the original Porter frameworks. This paper then introduces two new concepts, capturing the core and broadening without diluting, which are useful in reconciling some conflicting issues on the 'stuck-in-the-middle vs. mixed strategy' debate. A set of case studies of the automobile industry are conducted to support the new framework and concepts proposed in this paper.

[1]  Udo Zander,et al.  The Inside Track: On the Important (But Neglected) Role of Customers in the Resource - Based View of Strategy and Firm Growth , 2005 .

[2]  Fred R. David.  Strategic management : concepts , 2001 .

[3]  M. Porter.  What is strategy , 2000 .

[4]  Polly S. Rizova,et al.  Are You Networked for Successful Innovation , 2008 .

[5]  E. P. Michael.  Strategy and the Internet. , 2001 .

[6]  A. Murray.  A Contingency View of Porter's “Generic Strategies” , 1988 .

[7]  R. Mauborgne,et al.  Blue Ocean Strategy: From Theory to Practice , 2005 .

[8]  M. Sawhney,et al.  The 12 different ways for companies to innovate , 2012, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[9]  M. Porter,et al.  Redefining competition in health care. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[10]  J. Pfeffer.  Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people , 1995 .

[11]  M. Porter,et al.  Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-based Competition on Results , 2006 .

[12]  Alex Miller,et al.  ASSESSING PORTER'S (1980) MODEL IN TERMS OF ITS GENERALIZABILITY, ACCURACY AND SIMPLICITY , 1993 .

[13]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Corporate link and competitive strategy in multinational enterprises: a perspective from subsidiaries seeking host market penetration , 2004 .

[14]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[15]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies and Performance: An Empirical Examination with American Data , 1986 .

[16]  Samuel A. Spralls,et al.  Critical tactics for implementing Porter's generic strategies , 2006 .

[17]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Can Japan Compete , 2000 .

[18]  Moses Acquaah.  International joint venture partner origin, strategic choice, and performance: A comparative analysis in an emerging economy in Africa , 2009 .

[19]  Michael Allen,et al.  Global Business Strategy , 1996 .

[20]  D. Hambrick.  High Profit Strategies in Mature Capital Goods Industries: A Contingency Approach , 1983 .

[21]  F. David,et al.  Strategic management , 1986 .

[22]  Thomas L. Wheelen,et al.  Strategic Management and Business Policy , 1983 .

[23]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[24]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Are you sure you have a strategy , 2001 .