Improved image quality with simultaneously reduced radiation exposure: Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithms for coronary CT angiography in a clinical setting.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess the potential for radiation dose reduction using knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (K-IMR) algorithms in combination with ultra-low dose body mass index (BMI)-adapted protocols in coronary CT angiography (coronary CTA). METHODS Forty patients undergoing clinically indicated coronary CTA were randomly assigned to two groups with BMI-adapted (I: <25.0 kg/m2, II: <28.0 kg/m2, III: <30.0 kg/m2, IV: ≥30.0 kg/m2) low dose (LD, I: 100kVp/75 mAs, II: 100kVp/100 mAs, III: 100kVp/150 mAs, IV: 120kVp/150 mAs, n = 20) or ultra-low dose (ULD, I: 100kVp/50 mAs, II: 100kVp/75 mAs, III: 100kVp/100 mAs, IV: 120kVp/100 mAs, n = 20) protocols. Prospectively-triggered coronary CTA was performed using a 256-MDCT with the lowest reasonable scan length. Images were generated with filtered back projection (FBP), a noise-reducing hybrid iterative algorithm (iD, levels 2/5) and K-IMR using cardiac routine (CR) and cardiac sharp settings, levels 1-3. RESULTS Groups were comparable regarding anthropometric parameters, heart rate, and scan length. The use of ULD protocols resulted in a significant reduction of radiation exposure (0.7 (0.6-0.9) mSv vs. 1.1 (0.9-1.7) mSv; p < 0.02). Image quality was significantly better in the ULD group using K-IMR CR 1 compared to FBP, iD 2 and iD 5 in the LD group, resulting in fewer non-diagnostic coronary segments (2.4% vs. 11.6%, 9.2% and 6.1%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The combination of K-IMR with BMI-adapted ULD protocols results in significant radiation dose savings while simultaneously improving image quality compared to LD protocols with FBP or hybrid iterative algorithms. Therefore, K-IMR allows for coronary CTA examinations with high diagnostic value and very low radiation exposure in clinical routine.

[1]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2013, European heart journal.

[2]  K. Chinnaiyan,et al.  Progressive Radiation Dose Reduction From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in a Statewide Collaborative Quality Improvement Program: Results From the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[3]  Yan Jiang,et al.  Feasibility study of low tube voltage (80 kVp) coronary CT angiography combined with contrast medium reduction using iterative model reconstruction (IMR) on standard BMI patients. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  A. Einstein,et al.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2007, JAMA.

[5]  J. Leipsic,et al.  SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: A report of the society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee: Endorsed by the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). , 2016, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[6]  M. Hadamitzky,et al.  Prospective Randomized Trial on Radiation Dose Estimates of CT Angiography Applying Iterative Image Reconstruction: The PROTECTION V Study. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[7]  M. Vembar,et al.  Optimizing Radiation Dose Levels in Prospectively Electrocardiogram-Triggered Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using Iterative Reconstruction Techniques: A Phantom and Patient Study , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  H. Shim,et al.  Image quality of Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D of coronary CT angiography of 640-slice CT: comparison with filtered back-projection , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[9]  Hugo A Katus,et al.  Reduction of radiation exposure and improvement of image quality with BMI-adapted prospective cardiac computed tomography and iterative reconstruction. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[10]  W. Kalender,et al.  Image quality of ultra-low radiation exposure coronary CT angiography with an effective dose <0.1 mSv using high-pitch spiral acquisition and raw data-based iterative reconstruction , 2013, European Radiology.

[11]  Hatem Alkadhi,et al.  Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[12]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Body mass index-adapted prospective coronary computed tomography angiography. Determining the lowest limit for diagnostic purposes. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[13]  Submillisievert Radiation Dose Coronary CT Angiography: Clinical Impact of the Knowledge-Based Iterative Model Reconstruction. , 2016, Academic radiology.

[14]  S. Achenbach,et al.  SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[15]  F. Rybicki,et al.  Simulated 50 % radiation dose reduction in coronary CT angiography using adaptive iterative dose reduction in three-dimensions (AIDR3D) , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[16]  Bernhard Bischoff,et al.  Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the PROTECTION I study. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[17]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary angiography with third-generation dual-source CT at 70 kVp tube voltage: feasibility, image quality, radiation dose, and effect of iterative reconstruction. , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.