Interaction of Inferior Temporal Cortex with Frontal Cortex and Basal Forebrain: Double Dissociation in Strategy Implementation and Associative Learning

Macaque monkeys learned a strategy task in which two groups of visual objects needed to be treated differently, one with persistent and one with sporadic object choices, to obtain food rewards. After preoperative training, they were divided into two surgical groups of three monkeys each. One group received crossed unilateral removals of frontal cortex and inferior temporal cortex (IT × FC) and were severely impaired in performing the strategy task. The other group received bilateral transection of anterior temporal stem, amygdala, and fornix (TS+AM+FX) and were unimpaired in performing the strategy task. Subsequently the same animals were tested in visual object–reward association learning. Here, confirming previous results, group IT × FC was unimpaired, whereas group TS+AM+FX was severely impaired. The results show that the amnesic effects of TS+AM+FX cannot be generally attributed to the partial temporal–frontal disconnection that this lesion creates, and therefore support the hypothesis that the amnesic effects of this lesion are caused primarily by the disconnection of temporal cortex from ascending inputs from the basal forebrain. The results also show that temporal–frontal interaction in strategy implementation does not require those routes of temporal–frontal interaction that are interrupted in TS+AM+FX, and therefore support the hypothesis that projections to other posterior cortical areas allow temporal and frontal cortex to interact with each other by multisynaptic corticocortical routes in strategy implementation.

[1]  A. Luria Higher Cortical Functions in Man , 1980, Springer US.

[2]  T. Shallice Specific impairments of planning. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  B. Milner Some cognitive effects of frontal-lobe lesions in man. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  R. Saunders,et al.  Effects of Fornix Transection upon Associative Memory in Monkeys: Role of the Hippocampus in Learned Action , 1984, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[5]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Neural inputs into the nucleus basalis of the substantia innominata (Ch4) in the rhesus monkey. , 1984, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  J. Duncan Disorganisation of behaviour after frontal lobe damage , 1986 .

[7]  David Gaffan,et al.  Inferotemporal-frontal disconnection and fornix transection in visuomotor conditional learning by monkeys , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[8]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Reaching to a rewarded visual stimulus: interhemispheric conflict and hand use in monkeys with forebrain commissurotomy. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  T. Robbins,et al.  Planning and spatial working memory following frontal lobe lesions in man , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Auditory-visual associations, hemispheric specialization and temporal-frontal interaction in the rhesus monkey. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  M. J. Eacott,et al.  Inferotemporal‐frontal Disconnection: The Uncinate Fascicle and Visual Associative Learning in Monkeys , 1992, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Visual Learning for an Auditory Secondary Reinforcer by Macaques is Intact after Uncinate Fascicle Section: Indirect Evidence for the Involvement of the Corpus Striatum , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Responses of cells in the tail of the caudate nucleus during visual discrimination learning. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  C. Gerfen,et al.  The frontal cortex-basal ganglia system in primates. , 1996, Critical reviews in neurobiology.

[16]  B T Hyman,et al.  H. M.’s Medial Temporal Lobe Lesion: Findings from Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  S. Gutnikov,et al.  Temporo‐frontal Disconnection Impairs Visual‐visual Paired Association Learning but not Configural Learning in Macaca Monkeys , 1997, The European journal of neuroscience.

[18]  J. Hornak,et al.  Visual neglect in the monkey. Representation and disconnection. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  J. Price,et al.  Prefrontal cortical projections to the hypothalamus in Macaque monkeys , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Trajectories of cholinergic pathways within the cerebral hemispheres of the human brain. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Amanda Parker,et al.  Memory after frontal/temporal disconnection in monkeys: conditional and non-conditional tasks, unilateral and bilateral frontal lesions , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  H. Barbas,et al.  Topographic Organization of Connections between the Hypothalamus and Prefrontal Cortex in the Rhesus Monkey , 2022 .

[23]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Comparison of perirhinal cortex ablation and crossed unilateral lesions of the medial forebrain bundle from the inferior temporal cortex in the rhesus monkey: effects on learning and retrieval. , 2000, Behavioral neuroscience.

[24]  Harry F. Baker,et al.  Visual discrimination learning impairments produced by combined transections of the anterior temporal stem, amygdala and fornix in marmoset monkeys , 2001, Brain Research.

[25]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Dense amnesia in the monkey after transection of fornix, amygdala and anterior temporal stem , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Amanda Parker,et al.  Crossed unilateral lesions of medial forebrain bundle and either inferior temporal or frontal cortex impair object recognition memory in Rhesus monkeys , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[27]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Crossed unilateral lesions of the medial forebrain bundle and either inferior temporal or frontal cortex impair object–reward association learning in Rhesus monkeys , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  David Gaffan,et al.  Against memory systems. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Unilateral lesions of the cholinergic basal forebrain and fornix in one hemisphere and inferior temporal cortex in the opposite hemisphere produce severe learning impairments in rhesus monkeys. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Projections from inferior temporal cortex to prefrontal cortex via the uncinate fascicle in rhesus monkeys , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Chronic ‘blindness’ following lesions of nonvisual cortex in the monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  M. J. Eacott,et al.  Uncinate fascicle section leaves delayed matching-to-sample intact, with both large and small stimulus sets , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.