Application of the Suchey-Brooks method to three-dimensional imaging of the pubic symphysis.

Age determination is a major field of interest in forensic anthropology. Among the different methods based on macroscopic skeletal study, the Suchey-Brooks method, which analyzes the pubic symphysis, is one of the most reliable. We applied the Suchey-Brooks method to three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstructions of the pubic symphysis. We demonstrated excellent agreement between the results of analysis of bone samples and those of the three-dimensional images, in particular regarding ridges of the articular surface and delimitation of the extremities. The accuracy of age estimation did not significantly differ (Wilcoxon test) between the Suchey-Brooks method applied to bones and the same method applied to CT images. Using high-quality images, this approach seems as reliable as the standard Suchey-Brooks method and offers several advantages: no bone preparation, no damage to bone material, and the possibility of application to living individuals.

[1]  A Donner,et al.  Sample size requirements for the comparison of two or more coefficients of inter-observer agreement. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  T. Riepert,et al.  Bone age determination based on the study of the medial extremity of the clavicle , 1998, European Radiology.

[3]  M. Vannier,et al.  Spiral (helical) CT. , 1993, Radiology.

[4]  T. D. Stewart Distortion of the pubic symphyseal surface in females and its effect of age determination. , 1957, American journal of physical anthropology.

[5]  J. M. Suchey Problems in the aging of females using the Os pubis. , 1979, American journal of physical anthropology.

[6]  D D Robertson,et al.  Comparison of helical and serial CT with regard to three-dimensional imaging of musculoskeletal anatomy. , 1992, Radiology.

[7]  K. Hanihara,et al.  Estimation of age from the pubic symphysis by means of multiple regression analysis. , 1978, American journal of physical anthropology.

[8]  D. Katz,et al.  Age determination of the male os pubis. , 1986, American journal of physical anthropology.

[9]  A. Blum,et al.  Scanners multicoupes: principes et nouvelles applications scanographiques. , 2000 .

[10]  S T BROOKS,et al.  Skeletal age at death: the reliability of cranial and pubic age indicators. , 1955, American journal of physical anthropology.

[11]  T. Wingate Todd,et al.  Age changes in the pubic bone , 1921 .

[12]  W A Kalender,et al.  A Comparison of Conventional and Spiral CT: An Experimental Study on the Detection of Spherical Lesions , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  J. R. Landis,et al.  A one-way components of variance model for categorical data , 1977 .

[14]  S. Brooks,et al.  Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: A comparison of the Acsádi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks methods , 1990 .

[15]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .