Unsupervised image segmentation evaluation and refinement using a multi-scale approach

Abstract In this study, a multi-scale approach is used to improve the segmentation of a high spatial resolution (30 cm) color infrared image of a residential area. First, a series of 25 image segmentations are performed in Definiens Professional 5 using different scale parameters. The optimal image segmentation is identified using an unsupervised evaluation method of segmentation quality that takes into account global intra-segment and inter-segment heterogeneity measures (weighted variance and Moran’s I, respectively). Once the optimal segmentation is determined, under-segmented and over-segmented regions in this segmentation are identified using local heterogeneity measures (variance and Local Moran’s I). The under- and over-segmented regions are refined by (1) further segmenting under-segmented regions at finer scales, and (2) merging over-segmented regions with spectrally similar neighbors. This process leads to the creation of several segmentations consisting of segments generated at three different segmentation scales. Comparison of single- and multi-scale segmentations shows that identifying and refining under- and over-segmented regions using local statistics can improve global segmentation results.

[1]  Martin Volk,et al.  The comparison index: A tool for assessing the accuracy of image segmentation , 2007, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[2]  David W. Paglieroni Design considerations for image segmentation quality assessment measures , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Antônio Miguel Vieira Monteiro,et al.  Parameter selection for region‐growing image segmentation algorithms using spatial autocorrelation , 2006 .

[4]  M. Neubert,et al.  Assessing image segmentation quality – concepts, methods and application , 2008 .

[5]  G. Hay,et al.  Object-Based Image Analysis , 2008 .

[6]  Kannan,et al.  ON IMAGE SEGMENTATION TECHNIQUES , 2022 .

[7]  M. Charlton,et al.  Quantitative geography : perspectives on spatial data analysis by , 2001 .

[8]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Combining Spectral and Texture Data in the Segmentation of Remotely Sensed Images , 1996 .

[9]  P. Gong,et al.  Accuracy Assessment Measures for Object-based Image Segmentation Goodness , 2010 .

[10]  P. Gong,et al.  Object-based Detailed Vegetation Classification with Airborne High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery , 2006 .

[11]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Object based image analysis for remote sensing , 2010 .

[12]  Fan Xia,et al.  Assessing object-based classification: advantages and limitations , 2009 .

[13]  Bo Xu,et al.  GEOBIA vegetation mapping in Great Smoky Mountains National Park with spectral and non-spectral ancillary information. , 2010 .

[14]  Janet Franklin,et al.  The accuracy of vegetation stand boundaries derived from image segmentation in a desert environment , 1998 .

[15]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing theme issue “Terrestrial Laser Scanning” , 2006 .

[16]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Complexity metrics to quantify semantic accuracy in segmented Landsat images , 2005 .

[17]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Image segmentation evaluation: A survey of unsupervised methods , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[18]  A. Stein,et al.  Texture-based landform segmentation of LiDAR imagery , 2005 .

[19]  S. M. Jong,et al.  Remote Sensing Image Analysis: Including The Spatial Domain , 2011 .

[20]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  New contextual approaches using image segmentation for objectbased classification , 2004 .

[21]  Josef Strobl,et al.  What’s wrong with pixels? Some recent developments interfacing remote sensing and GIS , 2001 .

[22]  Chad Hendrix,et al.  A Comparison of Urban Mapping Methods Using High-Resolution Digital Imagery , 2003 .

[23]  U. Benz,et al.  Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information , 2004 .

[24]  Austin Troy,et al.  Development of an object-based framework for classifying and inventorying human-dominated forest ecosystems , 2009 .

[25]  Jean Louchet,et al.  Using colour, texture, and hierarchial segmentation for high-resolution remote sensing , 2008 .

[26]  Hélène Laurent,et al.  Unsupervised Performance Evaluation of Image Segmentation , 2006, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[27]  Alexandre Carleer,et al.  Assessment of Very High Spatial Resolution Satellite Image Segmentations , 2005 .

[28]  Brian Johnson,et al.  Object-based target search using remotely sensed data: A case study in detecting invasive exotic Australian Pine in south Florida , 2008 .

[29]  Timothy A. Warner,et al.  Estimation of optimal image object size for the segmentation of forest stands with multispectral IKONOS imagery , 2008 .

[30]  L. Anselin Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA , 2010 .

[31]  A. C. Seijmonsbergen,et al.  Improved landsat-based forest mapping in steep mountainous terrain , 2003 .

[32]  Timothy A. Warner,et al.  Forest Type Mapping using Object-specific Texture Measures from Multispectral Ikonos Imagery: Segmentation Quality and Image Classification Issues , 2009 .

[33]  Yu Jin Zhang,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of different segmentation algorithms , 1997, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[34]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  A comparison of three image-object methods for the multiscale analysis of landscape structure , 2003 .