Antitumor effect of microbubbles enhanced by low frequency ultrasound cavitation on prostate carcinoma xenografts in nude mice.

The aim of this study was to investigate the antitumor effect induced by low frequency (20 kHz) ultrasound (US) radiation combined with intravenous injection of microbubbles (Mbs) on prostate carcinoma Du145 xenografts in nude mice. Du145 prostate tumors were percutaneously implanted in 40 nude mice, which were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=10 each): US+Mbs, US, Mbs and control groups. The mice in the US+Mbs group were treated with 20 kHz, 200 mW/cm(2) US radiation and with 0.2 ml Mbs injected intravenously. Mice in the US and Mbs groups were only treated with US radiation and injection of Mbs, respectively. Tumors were measured with sonography, and the ratio of antitumor growth was calculated. The mice were sacrificed 14 days after treatment. Specimens of the tumor tissues were observed pathologically using light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Microvessel density and the average optical density of vascular endothelial growth factor were compared among groups by immunohistochemistry. The average gross tumor volume of the US+Mbs group was significantly reduced compared with the other groups following treatment (P<0.05). The ratio of the antitumor growth in the US+Mbs group was significantly greater than that of the US and Mbs group (P<0.05). Histological examination showed signs of tumor cell injury in the US+Mbs group. Examination by electron microscopy revealed vessel injury in the endothelium in the tumors treated with US+Mbs. Microvessel density and the average optical density of vascular endothelial growth factor in the US+Mbs group were significantly less than that of other groups (P<0.05). In conclusion, low frequency US of 20 kHz radiation combined with Mbs may be used to inhibit the growth of human prostate carcinoma xenografts in nude mice, and the effect is likely realized through microvessel destruction caused by cavitation.

[1]  J. E. Parsons,et al.  Refining histotripsy: defining the parameter space for the creation of nonthermal lesions with high intensity, pulsed focused ultrasound of the in vitro kidney. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[2]  Natalia Vykhodtseva,et al.  Focal disruption of the blood-brain barrier due to 260-kHz ultrasound bursts: a method for molecular imaging and targeted drug delivery. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  R. Kalluri,et al.  Endogenous inhibitors of angiogenesis. , 2005, Cancer research.

[4]  L. Ellis,et al.  Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  L. Benjamin,et al.  Angiogenesis: Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[6]  N. Ferrara,et al.  The biology of VEGF and its receptors , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[7]  S. Kaul,et al.  Contrast Ultrasound Targeted Drug and Gene Delivery: An Update on a New Therapeutic Modality , 2002, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics.

[8]  E. Unger,et al.  Therapeutic applications of microbubbles , 2001 .

[9]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Noninvasive MR imaging-guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits. , 2001, Radiology.

[10]  E. Unger,et al.  Local drug and gene delivery through microbubbles. , 2001, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[11]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Myocardial contrast agents: recent advances and future directions. , 2001, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[12]  S. Kaul,et al.  Delivery of Drugs with Ultrasound , 2001, Echocardiography.

[13]  K. Tachibana,et al.  The Use of Ultrasound for Drug Delivery , 2001, Echocardiography.

[14]  T. Porter,et al.  Therapeutic Ultrasound for Gene Delivery , 2001, Echocardiography.

[15]  M. Barda-Saad,et al.  Apoptosis induction of human myeloid leukemic cells by ultrasound exposure. , 2000, Cancer research.

[16]  D. Hanahan,et al.  The Hallmarks of Cancer , 2000, Cell.

[17]  N. Weidner.  Tumour vascularity and proliferation: clear evidence of a close relationship , 1999, The Journal of pathology.

[18]  P. Dayton,et al.  Acoustic radiation force in vivo: a mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  N. Sanghvi,et al.  Noninvasive ultrasonic subtotal ablation of the prostate in dogs. , 1996, American journal of veterinary research.

[20]  M. Marberger,et al.  Effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound on human prostate cancer in vivo. , 1995, Cancer research.

[21]  L. Ellis,et al.  The implications of angiogenesis for the biology and therapy of cancer metastasis , 1994, Cell.

[22]  J P Donohue,et al.  High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of prostatic tissue. , 1994, Urology.

[23]  J. B. Fowlkes,et al.  Acoustic cavitation generated by microsecond pulses of ultrasound , 1986, Nature.

[24]  R. Apfel.  Acoustic cavitation: a possible consequence of biomedical uses of ultrasound. , 1982, The British journal of cancer. Supplement.

[25]  A. E. Miller,et al.  A NEW METHOD FOR THE GENERATION AND USE OF FOCUSED ULTRASOUND IN EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY , 1942, The Journal of general physiology.

[26]  F. Valtot,et al.  Treatment of glaucoma with high intensity focused ultrasound , 2005, International ophtalmology.

[27]  G Vallancien,et al.  Focused extracorporeal pyrotherapy. , 1993, European urology.